[#80531] Re: [ruby-cvs:65407] normal:r58236 (trunk): thread.c: comments on M:N threading [ci skip] — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>

SASADA Koichi <ko1@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

24 messages 2017/04/02
[#80532] Re: [ruby-cvs:65407] normal:r58236 (trunk): thread.c: comments on M:N threading [ci skip] — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2017/04/02

On 2017/04/02 11:35, Eric Wong wrote:

[#80540] Re: [ruby-cvs:65407] normal:r58236 (trunk): thread.c: comments on M:N threading [ci skip] — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2017/04/03

SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:

[#81027] Re: [ruby-cvs:65407] normal:r58236 (trunk): thread.c: comments on M:N threading [ci skip] — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2017/05/08

Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:

[#81028] Re: [ruby-cvs:65407] normal:r58236 (trunk): thread.c: comments on M:N threading [ci skip] — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2017/05/08

On 2017/05/08 9:33, Eric Wong wrote:

[#81029] Re: [ruby-cvs:65407] normal:r58236 (trunk): thread.c: comments on M:N threading [ci skip] — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2017/05/08

On 2017/05/08 10:53, SASADA Koichi wrote:

[#81031] Re: [ruby-cvs:65407] normal:r58236 (trunk): thread.c: comments on M:N threading [ci skip] — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2017/05/08

SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:

[#81033] Re: [ruby-cvs:65407] normal:r58236 (trunk): thread.c: comments on M:N threading [ci skip] — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2017/05/08

On 2017/05/08 12:01, Eric Wong wrote:

[#81035] Re: [ruby-cvs:65407] normal:r58236 (trunk): thread.c: comments on M:N threading [ci skip] — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2017/05/08

SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:

[#81042] Re: [ruby-cvs:65407] normal:r58236 (trunk): thread.c: comments on M:N threading [ci skip] — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2017/05/09

On 2017/05/08 15:36, Eric Wong wrote:

[#81044] Re: [ruby-cvs:65407] normal:r58236 (trunk): thread.c: comments on M:N threading [ci skip] — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2017/05/09

SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:

[#81045] Re: [ruby-cvs:65407] normal:r58236 (trunk): thread.c: comments on M:N threading [ci skip] — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2017/05/09

On 2017/05/09 12:38, Eric Wong wrote:

[#81047] Re: [ruby-cvs:65407] normal:r58236 (trunk): thread.c: comments on M:N threading [ci skip] — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2017/05/09

SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:

[ruby-core:80797] [Ruby trunk Bug#13485] MinGW TestEnumerable#test_callcc SEGV info

From: Greg.mpls@...
Date: 2017-04-19 16:17:28 UTC
List: ruby-core #80797
Issue #13485 has been reported by MSP-Greg (Greg L).

----------------------------------------
Bug #13485: MinGW TestEnumerable#test_callcc SEGV info
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/13485

* Author: MSP-Greg (Greg L)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: 
* Target version: 
* ruby -v: ruby 2.5.0dev (2017-04-18 trunk 58397) [x64-mingw32]
* Backport: 2.2: UNKNOWN, 2.3: UNKNOWN, 2.4: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
Re the patch needed in MinGW builds for [TestEnumerable#test_callcc](https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/d6873af4bdc99914f20f6184966fa840c91bdf10/test/ruby/test_enum.rb#L559-L570) (file `test/ruby/test_enum.rb`), I ran the following code with `--disable-gems`:

```ruby
require_relative '<path to ruby>/lib/ruby/2.5.0/x64-mingw32/continuation.so'

1000.times {
  c = nil
  o = Object.new
  class << o; self; end.class_eval do
    define_method(:<=>) do |x|
      callcc {|c2| c ||= c2 }
      0
    end
  end
  ary = [o,o]
  begin
    ary.sort_by {|x| x }
    c.to_s ; c.call
  rescue
  end
}
```

Attached is a file with the code and the SEGV output when running.  I removed the ruby path to shorten it.

Note that if the line -

```ruby
    c.to_s ; c.call
```
is replaced with -

```ruby
    c.call
```

my system hangs/stops.  No output, no response; have to force the command window closed...


---Files--------------------------------
TestEnumerable#call_cc_SEGV.txt (4.01 KB)


-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>

In This Thread

Prev Next