[#80531] Re: [ruby-cvs:65407] normal:r58236 (trunk): thread.c: comments on M:N threading [ci skip] — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
SASADA Koichi <ko1@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
On 2017/04/02 11:35, Eric Wong wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
On 2017/05/08 9:33, Eric Wong wrote:
On 2017/05/08 10:53, SASADA Koichi wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
On 2017/05/08 12:01, Eric Wong wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
On 2017/05/08 15:36, Eric Wong wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
On 2017/05/09 12:38, Eric Wong wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
On 2017/05/09 14:12, Eric Wong wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
On 2017/05/09 15:23, Eric Wong wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
Thank you.
[#80763] [Ruby trunk Feature#13434] better method definition in C API — naruse@...
Issue #13434 has been updated by naruse (Yui NARUSE).
[#80844] [Ruby trunk Bug#13503] Improve performance of some Time & Rational methods — watson1978@...
Issue #13503 has been updated by watson1978 (Shizuo Fujita).
[#80892] [Ruby trunk Misc#13514] [PATCH] thread_pthread.c (native_sleep): preserve old unblock function — ko1@...
Issue #13514 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).
ko1@atdot.net wrote:
On 2017/04/27 8:58, Eric Wong wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
[ruby-core:80549] [Ruby trunk Feature#9999] Type Annotations (Static Type Checking)
Issue #9999 has been updated by burlesona (Andrew Burleson). RDL is interesting, I wonder what the runtime overhead is like? Another source of inspiration could be Facebook's Flow ([[https://flow.org/en/docs/getting-started/]]) for JS. In that case it's build-time type checking, mostly inferred, with optional annotations. While it would be nice to avoid mandatory annotations, and I see Matz saying they won't exist at all, being able to add optional annotations would be nice. /shrug ---------------------------------------- Feature #9999: Type Annotations (Static Type Checking) https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9999#change-64049 * Author: DAddYE (Davide D'Agostino) * Status: Feedback * Priority: Normal * Assignee: * Target version: ---------------------------------------- Hi all, I know @matz is interested in introducing **type annotations** in ruby. More here: https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/5583 I think it's time for ruby to get this. Before working on a patch I would like to know: 1. Syntax of methods signatures 2. Syntax of variables guards (?) 3. Implementation For point **1** I was thinking in some like: ~~~ruby def connect(r -> Stream, c -> Client) -> Fiber def connect(Stream r, Client c) -> Fiber # quite sure this will make some reduce problems in the grammar ~~~ Before making a proposal consider: keyword arguments and default value collisions. Then for point **2** I'm not sure if we want also check assignments but as before a syntax could be: ~~~ruby r: Client = something # will throw an exception if something is not kind of Client ~~~ Finally, **implementation**. Do we want some in python style and then leave the programmer/library for the implementation **or** (and I'm for this) we want MRI do that, if so how? Cheers! DD p.s. Sorry if this issue was already discussed but I didn't find anything except the link posted. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>