[#61822] Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014 — Zachary Scott <e@...>
I would like to request developers meeting around April 17 or 18 in this mo=
14 messages
2014/04/03
[#61825] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
2014/04/03
It's good if we have a meeting then.
[#61826] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Zachary Scott <e@...>
2014/04/03
Regarding openssl issues, I=E2=80=99ve discussed possible meeting time with=
[#61833] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Martin Bo煬et <martin.bosslet@...>
2014/04/03
Hi,
[#61847] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/04/03
Martin Boテ殕et <martin.bosslet@gmail.com> wrote:
[#61849] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Zachary Scott <e@...>
2014/04/04
I will post summary of meeting on Google docs after the meeting.
[#61852] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/04/04
Zachary Scott <e@zzak.io> wrote:
[#61860] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Zachary Scott <e@...>
2014/04/04
I=E2=80=99m ok with redmine, thanks for bringing up your concern!
[#62076] Candidacy to 2.1 branch maintainer. — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <nagachika00@...>
Hello,
7 messages
2014/04/17
[#62078] Re: Candidacy to 2.1 branch maintainer.
— SHIBATA Hiroshi <shibata.hiroshi@...>
2014/04/17
> And does anyone have counter proposal for 2.1 maintenance?
[ruby-core:62082] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8895] Destructuring Assignment for Hash
From:
xovatdev@...
Date:
2014-04-17 23:25:13 UTC
List:
ruby-core #62082
Issue #8895 has been updated by Sean Linsley.
This is what I'm imagining:
~~~
a, b, *c, d:, e:, f: 'f', **g =3D [1, 2, 3, {d: 4, e: 5}]
a =3D=3D 1
b =3D=3D 2
c =3D=3D [3]
d =3D=3D 4
e =3D=3D 5
f =3D=3D 'f'
g =3D=3D {}
~~~
Where an error would be thrown if the hash didn't have the given key, and n=
o default was provided.
----------------------------------------
Feature #8895: Destructuring Assignment for Hash
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/8895#change-46247
* Author: Jack Chen
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:=20
* Category:=20
* Target version:=20
----------------------------------------
=3Dbegin
Given Ruby already supports destructuring assignment with Array (a, b =3D [=
1, 2]), I propose destructuring assignments for Hash.
=3D=3D Basic example
params =3D {name: "John Smith", age: 42}
{name: name, age: age} =3D params
# name =3D=3D "John Smith"
# age =3D=3D 42
This would replace a common pattern of assigning hash values to local varia=
bles to work with.
=3D=3D General syntax
{ <key-expr> =3D> <variable_name>, =E2=80=A6 } =3D <object that responds =
to #[]>
# Symbols
{ foo: bar } =3D { foo: "bar" }
bar =3D=3D "bar"
# Potential shorthand
{ foo } =3D { foo: "bar" }
foo =3D=3D "bar"
=3D=3D Use cases:
# MatchData
{ username: username, age: age } =3D "user:jsmith age:42".match(/user:(?<=
username>\w+) age:(?<age>\d+)/)
username =3D=3D "jsmith"
age =3D=3D "42"
=3D=3D Edge cases
# Variable being assigned to more than once should use the last one
{ foo: var, bar: var } =3D {foo: 1, bar: 2}
var =3D=3D 2
Thoughts?
=3Dend
--=20
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/