ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)
2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

[#35399] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4426] rubygems/test_gem_gemcutter_utilities.rb fails — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>

1 message 2011/03/01

[#35400] Fwd: [ruby-cvs:38176] Ruby:r30994 (trunk): * string.c (rb_str_byteslice): the resulted encoding should keep — "Martin J. Dst" <duerst@...>

I'm really surprised that the encoding is kept for an arbitrary byteslice.

3 messages 2011/03/01
[#35401] Re: Fwd: [ruby-cvs:38176] Ruby:r30994 (trunk): * string.c (rb_str_byteslice): the resulted encoding should keep — Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...> 2011/03/01

Hi,
[#35411] Re: Fwd: [ruby-cvs:38176] Ruby:r30994 (trunk): * string.c (rb_str_byteslice): the resulted encoding should keep — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2011/03/02

Hi,

[#35402] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4396] [Rejected] windows commands starting with "@" should run at all even though command string is quoted by `"'. — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...>

1 message 2011/03/01

[#35403] Why are hash keys sometimes duped? — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>

Why are some objects duped when they are used as hash keys and other

6 messages 2011/03/01
[#35407] Re: Why are hash keys sometimes duped? — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/03/01

Aaron Patterson <aaron@tenderlovemaking.com> wrote:
[#35408] Re: Why are hash keys sometimes duped? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/03/02

Hi,
[#35409] Re: Why are hash keys sometimes duped? — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2011/03/02

On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 09:04:44AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#35410] Re: Why are hash keys sometimes duped? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/03/02

Hi,
[#35422] Re: Why are hash keys sometimes duped? — Kurt Stephens <ks@...> 2011/03/04

On 3/1/11 9:25 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#35404] redmine email changes — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

Is there any way to get redmine email to not be "To: undisclosed-recipients:;" ? My server side filters are set up for recipient and now they're all hitting my inbox instead of my ruby-core box.

2 messages 2011/03/01
[#35405] Re: redmine email changes — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2011/03/01

On Mar 1, 2011, at 2:01 PM, Ryan Davis wrote:

[#35406] [Backport86 - Bug #1883] REXML hash sometimes computes a value that is too large — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

1 message 2011/03/01

[#35412] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4452] [Rejected] Speedup Date._parse and Date._strptime by using a plain Hash — tadayoshi funaba <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/03/02

[#35413] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4451] Date#step does not raise ArgumentError for 0 step — tadayoshi funaba <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/03/02

[#35414] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4257] [Closed] switch_hitter - an acceleration of date library — tadayoshi funaba <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/03/02

[#35415] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4068] [Rejected] Replace current standard Date/DateTime library with home_run — tadayoshi funaba <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/03/02

[#35416] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4391] date/delta tests — tadayoshi funaba <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/03/02

[#35417] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4463][Open] [PATCH] release GVL for fcntl() for operations that may block — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>

8 messages 2011/03/03
[#35418] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4463][Open] [PATCH] release GVL for fcntl() for operations that may block — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/03/03

> Issue #4463 has been reported by Eric Wong.
[#35424] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4463][Open] [PATCH] release GVL for fcntl() for operations that may block — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/03/04

Hi
[#35425] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4463][Open] [PATCH] release GVL for fcntl() for operations that may block — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/03/04

KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com> wrote:
[#35428] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4463][Open] [PATCH] release GVL for fcntl() for operations that may block — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/03/05

Hi
[#35429] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4463][Open] [PATCH] release GVL for fcntl() for operations that may block — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/03/05

KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com> wrote:
[#35499] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4463][Open] [PATCH] release GVL for fcntl() for operations that may block — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/03/14

Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
[#35437] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4463][Closed] [PATCH] release GVL for fcntl() for operations that may block — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/03/06

[#35419] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4464][Open] [PATCH] add Fcntl::Flock object for easier use of POSIX file locks — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>

7 messages 2011/03/03
[#35498] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4464] [PATCH] add Fcntl::Flock object for easier use of POSIX file locks — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/03/14

[#35507] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4464][Assigned] [PATCH] add Fcntl::Flock object for easier use of POSIX file locks — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/03/16

[#49108] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4464] [PATCH] add Fcntl::Flock object for easier use of POSIX file locks — "kosaki (Motohiro KOSAKI)" <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2012/11/08

[#35421] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4464] [PATCH] add Fcntl::Flock object for easier use of POSIX file locks — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/03/03

[#35497] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4464] [PATCH] add Fcntl::Flock object for easier use of POSIX file locks — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/03/14

[#37751] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4464] [PATCH] add Fcntl::Flock object for easier use of POSIX file locks — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/07/03

[#35420] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4465][Open] [PATCH] configure.in: fix warnflags being empty — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>

2 messages 2011/03/03
[#35423] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4465][Closed] [PATCH] configure.in: fix warnflags being empty — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/03/04

[#35426] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4467][Open] Process.maxgroups= should only accept numeric values — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>

10 messages 2011/03/04
[#35438] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4467] Process.maxgroups= should only accept numeric values — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/03/06

[#35427] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4467] Process.maxgroups= should only accept numeric values — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2011/03/04

[#35430] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4467] Process.maxgroups= should only accept numeric values — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/03/05

[#35431] Re: [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4467] Process.maxgroups= should only accept numeric values — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/03/05

> Hi
[#35439] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4467] Process.maxgroups= should only accept numeric values — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2011/03/07

[#35442] about how to write 'to' field in this mailing list — Kiyotaka ATSUMI <kiyotaka@...> 2011/03/07

Hello,
[#35546] Re: about how to write 'to' field in this mailing list — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2011/03/23

(2011/03/07 12:47), Kiyotaka ATSUMI wrote:
[#35453] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4467][Closed] Process.maxgroups= should only accept numeric values — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/03/07

[#35460] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4467] Process.maxgroups= should only accept numeric values — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2011/03/07

[#35432] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4469][Closed] Documentation code examples contain camelCase method names — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/03/05

[#35433] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4453][Assigned] Overriding #to_s changes #inspect — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/03/05

[#35434] [Ruby - Bug #3150] net/https peer verification doesn't do anything — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <nakahiro@...>

1 message 2011/03/05

[#35435] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4471][Open] sample list.rb generates warnings — Andrew Grimm <andrew.j.grimm@...>

2 messages 2011/03/06
[#35436] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4471][Closed] sample list.rb generates warnings — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/03/06

[#35440] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #1047] request: getters, setters for the GC — Narihiro Nakamura <authorNari@...>

4 messages 2011/03/07
[#35441] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #1047] request: getters, setters for the GC — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/03/07

Hi,
[#35443] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #1047] request: getters, setters for the GC — Narihiro Nakamura <authornari@...> 2011/03/07

Hi,
[#35464] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #1047] request: getters, setters for the GC — Kurt Stephens <ks@...> 2011/03/07

On 3/6/11 10:15 PM, Narihiro Nakamura wrote:

[#35444] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4476][Open] [PATCH] URI('http://hoge/b/').route_to('http://hoge/b') wrongly returns './' — Akinori MUSHA <knu@...>

3 messages 2011/03/07
[#35772] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4476][Closed] [PATCH] URI('http://hoge/b/').route_to('http://hoge/b') wrongly returns './' — redmine@... 2011/04/15

[#35445] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4476][Assigned] [PATCH] URI('http://hoge/b/').route_to('http://hoge/b') wrongly returns './' — Akinori MUSHA <knu@...> 2011/03/07

[#35446] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4477][Open] Kernel:exec and backtick (`) don't work for certain system commands — Joachim Wuttke <j.wuttke@...>

10 messages 2011/03/07
[#35452] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4477] Kernel:exec and backtick (`) don't work for certain system commands — Joachim Wuttke <j.wuttke@...> 2011/03/07

[#35455] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4477] Kernel:exec and backtick (`) don't work for certain system commands — Shota Fukumori <sorah@...> 2011/03/07

[#35456] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4477] Kernel:exec and backtick (`) don't work for certain system commands — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/03/07

2011/3/7 Shota Fukumori <sorah@tubusu.net>:
[#43613] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4477][Assigned] Kernel:exec and backtick (`) don't work for certain system commands — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...> 2012/03/25

[#43614] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4477] Kernel:exec and backtick (`) don't work for certain system commands — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...> 2012/03/25

[#45419] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4477] Kernel:exec and backtick (`) don't work for certain system commands — "akr (Akira Tanaka)" <akr@...> 2012/06/04

[#43440] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4477] Kernel:exec and backtick (`) don't work for certain system commands — akr <akr@...> 2012/03/18

[#43615] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4477] Kernel:exec and backtick (`) don't work for certain system commands — "mrkn (Kenta Murata)" <muraken@...> 2012/03/25

[#45420] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4477][Closed] Kernel:exec and backtick (`) don't work for certain system commands — "akr (Akira Tanaka)" <akr@...> 2012/06/04

[#35447] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4478][Open] hash order preservation fails on 64bit machine — Joachim Wuttke <j.wuttke@...>

3 messages 2011/03/07
[#35454] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4478][Feedback] hash order preservation fails on 64bit machine — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2011/03/07

[#37462] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4478][Rejected] hash order preservation fails on 64bit machine — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2011/06/26

[#35450] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #3436] Spawn the timer thread lazily — Mark Somerville <mark@...>

1 message 2011/03/07

[#35457] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4479][Open] Psych fails to parse timestamps which is parsable by Syck — Sakuro OZAWA <redmine@...>

4 messages 2011/03/07
[#35459] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4479] Psych fails to parse timestamps which is parsable by Syck — Sakuro OZAWA <redmine@...> 2011/03/07

[#35465] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4479][Third Party's Issue] Psych fails to parse timestamps which is parsable by Syck — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2011/03/07

[#35458] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4479] Psych fails to parse timestamps which is parsable by Syck — Sakuro OZAWA <redmine@...> 2011/03/07

[#35461] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4481][Open] Add client_ca method to OpenSSL::SSLSocket — Ippei Obayashi <ohai@...>

4 messages 2011/03/07
[#36864] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4481] Add client_ca method to OpenSSL::SSLSocket — Martin Bosslet <Martin.Bosslet@...> 2011/06/08

[#36868] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4481][Assigned] Add client_ca method to OpenSSL::SSLSocket — Martin Bosslet <Martin.Bosslet@...> 2011/06/08

[#37691] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4481][Feedback] Add client_ca method to OpenSSL::SSLSocket — Martin Bosslet <Martin.Bosslet@...> 2011/06/30

[#35462] Source for 1.8 syck gram.y and token.re? — Kurt Stephens <ks@...>

I found bug in 1.8 ext/syck. The problem is in gram.c and/or token.c.

7 messages 2011/03/07
[#35467] Re: Source for 1.8 syck gram.y and token.re? — Kurt Stephens <ks@...> 2011/03/08

This is obviously dead and gone: http://whytheluckystiff.net/syck/
[#35468] Re: Source for 1.8 syck gram.y and token.re? — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/03/08

Syck is dead. 1.9 should make Psych/libyaml default. The fact that
[#35469] Re: Source for 1.8 syck gram.y and token.re? — Kurt Stephens <ks@...> 2011/03/08

I know syck is dead.
[#35472] Re: Source for 1.8 syck gram.y and token.re? — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/03/09

Maybe it's possible to bribe Aaron into releasing a Psych gem for 1.8?
[#35487] Re: Source for 1.8 syck gram.y and token.re? — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2011/03/11

On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 06:28:32AM +0900, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#35488] Re: Source for 1.8 syck gram.y and token.re? — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/03/11

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Aaron Patterson

[#35463] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4383][Third Party's Issue] psych fails to parse a symbol in a flow sequence — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>

1 message 2011/03/07

[#35466] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4482][Open] ext/date/date_core.c has no documentation — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>

3 messages 2011/03/07
[#35484] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4482] ext/date/date_core.c has no documentation — mathew murphy <meta@...> 2011/03/11

[#35561] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4482][Closed] ext/date/date_core.c has no documentation — tadayoshi funaba <redmine@...> 2011/03/26

[#35470] [Backport92 - Backport #4486][Open] please backport r31075 to 1.9.2 — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>

2 messages 2011/03/09
[#36608] [Backport92 - Backport #4486][Rejected] please backport r31075 to 1.9.2 — Yuki Sonoda <yugui@...> 2011/05/31

[#35471] MRI silently handles .so files as Ruby sources — Simone Carletti <weppos@...>

Hello,

2 messages 2011/03/09
[#35473] Re: MRI silently handles .so files as Ruby sources — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/03/09

On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Simone Carletti <weppos@weppos.net> wrote:

[#35474] Fwd: You rogerpack2005@gmail.com are not member (ruby-core ML) — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>

As a note, when I update redmine, I get these to my (other) email

2 messages 2011/03/09
[#35597] Re: Fwd: You rogerpack2005@gmail.com are not member (ruby-core ML) — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2011/04/01

Could anybody look at this [emails are being sent by the logged in

[#35476] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4489][Open] [PATCH] Encodings with /-(unix|dos|mac)\Z/ — "James M. Lawrence" <quixoticsycophant@...>

20 messages 2011/03/10
[#35478] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4489][Rejected] [PATCH] Encodings with /-(unix|dos|mac)\Z/ — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2011/03/10

[#35480] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4489] [PATCH] Encodings with /-(unix|dos|mac)\Z/ — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2011/03/10

[#38630] [Backport92 - Backport #4489] [PATCH] Encodings with /-(unix|dos|mac)\Z/ — Yui NARUSE <naruse@...> 2011/07/31

[#38632] [Backport92 - Backport #4489] [PATCH] Encodings with /-(unix|dos|mac)\Z/ — "James M. Lawrence" <quixoticsycophant@...> 2011/07/31

[#38636] [Backport92 - Backport #4489] [PATCH] Encodings with /-(unix|dos|mac)\Z/ — "James M. Lawrence" <quixoticsycophant@...> 2011/08/01

[#38637] [Backport92 - Backport #4489] [PATCH] Encodings with /-(unix|dos|mac)\Z/ — Shyouhei Urabe <shyouhei@...> 2011/08/01

[#38638] [Backport92 - Backport #4489] [PATCH] Encodings with /-(unix|dos|mac)\Z/ — Yui NARUSE <naruse@...> 2011/08/01

[#38639] [Backport92 - Backport #4489] [PATCH] Encodings with /-(unix|dos|mac)\Z/ — Shyouhei Urabe <shyouhei@...> 2011/08/01

[#38643] [Backport92 - Backport #4489] [PATCH] Encodings with /-(unix|dos|mac)\Z/ — Yui NARUSE <naruse@...> 2011/08/01

[#38646] [Backport92 - Backport #4489] [PATCH] Encodings with /-(unix|dos|mac)\Z/ — "James M. Lawrence" <quixoticsycophant@...> 2011/08/01

[#35479] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4489] [PATCH] Encodings with /-(unix|dos|mac)\Z/ — "James M. Lawrence" <quixoticsycophant@...> 2011/03/10

[#35481] [Backport92 - Backport #4489] [PATCH] Encodings with /-(unix|dos|mac)\Z/ — "James M. Lawrence" <quixoticsycophant@...> 2011/03/10

[#35482] [Backport92 - Backport #4489] [PATCH] Encodings with /-(unix|dos|mac)\Z/ — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2011/03/10

[#35485] [Backport92 - Backport #4489] [PATCH] Encodings with /-(unix|dos|mac)\Z/ — "James M. Lawrence" <quixoticsycophant@...> 2011/03/11

[#35741] [Backport92 - Backport #4489] [PATCH] Encodings with /-(unix|dos|mac)\Z/ — redmine@... 2011/04/13

[#38628] [Backport92 - Backport #4489] [PATCH] Encodings with /-(unix|dos|mac)\Z/ — "James M. Lawrence" <quixoticsycophant@...> 2011/07/31

[#38634] [Backport92 - Backport #4489] [PATCH] Encodings with /-(unix|dos|mac)\Z/ — Yui NARUSE <naruse@...> 2011/08/01

[#38640] [Backport92 - Backport #4489] [PATCH] Encodings with /-(unix|dos|mac)\Z/ — "James M. Lawrence" <quixoticsycophant@...> 2011/08/01

[#38641] [Backport92 - Backport #4489] [PATCH] Encodings with /-(unix|dos|mac)\Z/ — Shyouhei Urabe <shyouhei@...> 2011/08/01

[#35483] /proc/$PID/environ in Linux — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>

I wanted to inspect the environment of a long-running process[1] and I

5 messages 2011/03/10
[#35486] Re: /proc/$PID/environ in Linux — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/03/11

> I wanted to inspect the environment of a long-running process[1] and I
[#35491] Re: /proc/$PID/environ in Linux — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/03/13

KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com> wrote:
[#35492] Re: /proc/$PID/environ in Linux — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/03/13

> @@ -1810,6 +1822,14 @@ set_arg0(VALUE val, ID id)
[#35496] Re: /proc/$PID/environ in Linux — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/03/14

KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com> wrote:

[#35489] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4496][Open] ri can't describe Kernel.warn — Brian Candler <b.candler@...>

3 messages 2011/03/12
[#35500] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4496][Rejected] ri can't describe Kernel.warn — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2011/03/14

[#35490] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4496] ri can't describe Kernel.warn — Brian Candler <b.candler@...> 2011/03/12

[#35493] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4500][Open] warning: implicit declaration of function 'fdatasync' for OS X — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...>

3 messages 2011/03/13
[#35602] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4500][Assigned] warning: implicit declaration of function 'fdatasync' for OS X — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/04/03

[#35607] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4500][Closed] warning: implicit declaration of function 'fdatasync' for OS X — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/04/04

[#35494] Re: can someone explain this? — Michael Edgar <adgar@...>

[+ruby-core]

1 message 2011/03/13

[#35495] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4503][Open] ext/win32ole writes into $srcdir during build, breaking read-only source tree builds — Jos Backus <jos@...>

5 messages 2011/03/14
[#35531] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4503] ext/win32ole writes into $srcdir during build, breaking read-only source tree builds — Jos Backus <jos@...> 2011/03/21

[#35532] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4503] ext/win32ole writes into $srcdir during build, breaking read-only source tree builds — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...> 2011/03/21

[#35530] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4503][Closed] ext/win32ole writes into $srcdir during build, breaking read-only source tree builds — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2011/03/21

[#35533] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4503] ext/win32ole writes into $srcdir during build, breaking read-only source tree builds — Jos Backus <jos@...> 2011/03/21

[#35501] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4504][Open] Add rb_funcall_passing_block to public API — "James M. Lawrence" <quixoticsycophant@...>

3 messages 2011/03/14
[#35504] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4504] Add rb_funcall_passing_block to public API — "James M. Lawrence" <quixoticsycophant@...> 2011/03/15

[#35523] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4504][Closed] Add rb_funcall_passing_block to public API — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2011/03/18

[#35502] [Backport92 - Backport #4357] Please backport r30629 and r30630 to 1_9_2 — Charles Nutter <headius@...>

1 message 2011/03/15

[#35503] [Backport92 - Backport #4357] Please backport r30629 and r30630 to 1_9_2 — Charles Nutter <headius@...>

1 message 2011/03/15

[#35505] TCPServer internals - chasing EBADF error — Xavier Shay <xavier-list@...>

Hello,

3 messages 2011/03/16
[#35506] Re: TCPServer internals - chasing EBADF error — Marcus Rueckert <darix@...> 2011/03/16

On 2011-03-16 19:57:30 +0900, Xavier Shay wrote:
[#35508] Re: TCPServer internals - chasing EBADF error — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2011/03/16

2011/3/16 Xavier Shay <xavier-list@rhnh.net>:

[#35509] Why has defined? been changed for autoloaded constants in 1.9? — Nikolai Weibull <now@...>

Hi!

6 messages 2011/03/17
[#35511] Re: Why has defined? been changed for autoloaded constants in 1.9? — Magnus Holm <judofyr@...> 2011/03/17

What about something like this?
[#35512] Re: Why has defined? been changed for autoloaded constants in 1.9? — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2011/03/17

On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:49, Magnus Holm <judofyr@gmail.com> wrote:
[#35514] Re: Why has defined? been changed for autoloaded constants in 1.9? — "Haase, Konstantin" <Konstantin.Haase@...> 2011/03/17

It has probably changed so you can autoload stuff like this:
[#35516] Re: Why has defined? been changed for autoloaded constants in 1.9? — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2011/03/17

On Mar 17, 2011, at 2:14 AM, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
[#35517] Re: Why has defined? been changed for autoloaded constants in 1.9? — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2011/03/17

On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 22:21, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:

[#35510] [Ruby 1.9 - Backport #4506][Open] backport r28557 to 1.9.2 — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>

1 message 2011/03/17

[#35513] String#upcase and UTF-8/Unicode not working — Nikolai Weibull <now@...>

Why does the following print ”äBC” instead of ”ÄBC”?

3 messages 2011/03/17
[#35520] Re: String#upcase and UTF-8/Unicode not working — OZAWA Sakuro <sakuro@2238club.org> 2011/03/18

On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 21:26, Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se> wrote:
[#35521] Re: String#upcase and UTF-8/Unicode not working — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2011/03/18

On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 07:15, OZAWA Sakuro <sakuro@2238club.org> wrote:

[#35515] Kernel.p rdoc is wrong — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

I'm thinking this change is better. Edits?

1 message 2011/03/17

[#35518] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4507][Open] FileUtils.cp in 1.9 doesn't preserve permissions unless :preserve is set — Oleg Shaldybin <oleg.shaldybin@...>

3 messages 2011/03/17
[#37018] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4507] FileUtils.cp in 1.9 doesn't preserve permissions unless :preserve is set — Koichi Sasada <redmine@...> 2011/06/11

[#37838] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4507][Closed] FileUtils.cp in 1.9 doesn't preserve permissions unless :preserve is set — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2011/07/07

[#35519] NoMethodError#message may take very long to execute — Adiel Mittmann <adiel@...>

Hello,

5 messages 2011/03/17
[#35543] Re: NoMethodError#message may take very long to execute — Adiel Mittmann <adiel@...> 2011/03/23

Hi,
[#35544] Re: NoMethodError#message may take very long to execute — David Yip <yipdw@...> 2011/03/23

Hi Adiel,
[#35547] Re: NoMethodError#message may take very long to execute — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2011/03/23

(2011/03/24 1:34), David Yip wrote:
[#35548] Re: NoMethodError#message may take very long to execute — Adiel Mittmann <adiel@...> 2011/03/23

Hello,

[#35526] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4510][Open] Float#round(n) is O(n) — Alex Young <alex@...>

1 message 2011/03/18

[#35527] using poll() for rb_io_wait_{read,writ}able()? — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>

Hello, on some OSes it should be easy to swap out some current

2 messages 2011/03/20
[#35529] Re: using poll() for rb_io_wait_{read,writ}able()? — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2011/03/20

[#35528] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4512][Open] [PATCH] ext/fcntl/fcntl.c: add F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC constant — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>

9 messages 2011/03/20
[#37624] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4512][Assigned] [PATCH] ext/fcntl/fcntl.c: add F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC constant — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/06/28

[#40277] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4512][Closed] [PATCH] ext/fcntl/fcntl.c: add F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC constant — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/10/22

[#37587] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4512] [PATCH] ext/fcntl/fcntl.c: add F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC constant — Hiroshi Nakamura <nakahiro@...> 2011/06/27

[#37601] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4512] [PATCH] ext/fcntl/fcntl.c: add F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC constant — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/06/28

Hiroshi Nakamura <nakahiro@gmail.com> wrote:
[#37710] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4512][Feedback] [PATCH] ext/fcntl/fcntl.c: add F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC constant — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/07/01

[#37713] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4512] [PATCH] ext/fcntl/fcntl.c: add F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC constant — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/07/01

[#37742] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4512][Assigned] [PATCH] ext/fcntl/fcntl.c: add F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC constant — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/07/02

[#38892] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4512] [PATCH] ext/fcntl/fcntl.c: add F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC constant — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/08/10

[#35534] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4515][Open] File.each_line read all lines of file as one line — Yen-Nan Lin <redmine@...>

3 messages 2011/03/21
[#35535] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4515][Open] File.each_line read all lines of file as one line — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/03/21

Hi,
[#35539] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4515][Rejected] File.each_line read all lines of file as one line — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2011/03/22

[#35536] File.write take 4 — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>

Hello all.

6 messages 2011/03/21
[#36090] Fwd: File.write take 4 — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2011/05/10

Could I get any feedback on my latest patch for File.write?
[#36098] Re: Fwd: File.write take 4 — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/05/11

> Could I get any feedback on my latest patch for File.write?
[#36141] Re: Fwd: File.write take 4 — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2011/05/12

Hello,
[#36145] Re: Fwd: File.write take 4 — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/05/12

Hi
[#36283] Re: Fwd: File.write take 4 — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2011/05/17

> But it could probably be better by Run Paint Run Run's

[#35537] Re: Welcome to our (ruby-core ML) You are added automatically — Michael Frasca <michael.frasca@...>

guide

1 message 2011/03/21

[#35538] Re: Welcome to our (ruby-core ML) You are added automatically — Michael Frasca <michael.frasca@...>

help

1 message 2011/03/21

[#35540] [Ruby 1.9 - Backport #3803] BigDecimal::ROUND_HALF_DOWN/ROUND_HALF_EVEN behave incorrectly (disagree with JRuby and the rest of the world) — Kenta Murata <muraken@...>

1 message 2011/03/22

[#35542] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4519][Open] rubygems/test_gem_package_task.rb breaks rake/test_filelist.rb — Yutaka HARA <redmine@...>

4 messages 2011/03/23
[#35545] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4519][Assigned] rubygems/test_gem_package_task.rb breaks rake/test_filelist.rb — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2011/03/23

[#37433] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4519] rubygems/test_gem_package_task.rb breaks rake/test_filelist.rb — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <nakahiro@...> 2011/06/26

[#37903] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4519][Closed] rubygems/test_gem_package_task.rb breaks rake/test_filelist.rb — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2011/07/08

[#35550] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4521][Open] NoMethodError#message may take very long to execute — Adiel Mittmann <adiel@...>

2 messages 2011/03/24
[#49700] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4521] NoMethodError#message may take very long to execute — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...> 2012/11/20

[#35551] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4498][Open] [Patch] REXML Pretty formater does use specified 'width' to wrap lines — Michael Frasca <michael.frasca@...>

REXML::Formatters::Pretty has 'width' attribute used to wrap lines.

1 message 2011/03/24

[#35552] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4523][Open] Kernel#require to return the path of the loaded file — Alex Young <alex@...>

14 messages 2011/03/24
[#43442] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4523] Kernel#require to return the path of the loaded file — nobu <nobu@...> 2012/03/18

[#43467] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #4523] Kernel#require to return the path of the loaded file — Alex Young <alex@...> 2012/03/19

On 18/03/12 10:22, nobu wrote:
[#43469] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #4523] Kernel#require to return the path of the loaded file — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2012/03/19

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Alex Young <alex@blackkettle.org> wrote:
[#43477] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #4523] Kernel#require to return the path of the loaded file — Alex Young <alex@...> 2012/03/19

On 19/03/12 11:58, Luis Lavena wrote:
[#43486] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #4523] Kernel#require to return the path of the loaded file — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2012/03/19

On Mar 19, 2012, at 10:16 AM, Alex Young wrote:
[#43493] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #4523] Kernel#require to return the path of the loaded file — Alex Young <alex@...> 2012/03/20

On 19/03/12 23:24, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#40155] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4523] Kernel#require to return the path of the loaded file — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...> 2011/10/14

[#40156] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4523][Feedback] Kernel#require to return the path of the loaded file — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2011/10/15

[#40175] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4523] Kernel#require to return the path of the loaded file — Alex Young <alex@...> 2011/10/17

[#43456] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4523] Kernel#require to return the path of the loaded file — "trans (Thomas Sawyer)" <transfire@...> 2012/03/18

[#43457] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4523] Kernel#require to return the path of the loaded file — "drbrain (Eric Hodel)" <drbrain@...7.net> 2012/03/18

[#43458] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4523] Kernel#require to return the path of the loaded file — "trans (Thomas Sawyer)" <transfire@...> 2012/03/18

[#43494] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4523][Rejected] Kernel#require to return the path of the loaded file — "nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada)" <nobu@...> 2012/03/20

[#35553] 1.9 DL usage examples? — Jon <jon.forums@...>

Other than the source and tests, does anyone know of decent 1.9 DL example repos or blog posts?

1 message 2011/03/25

[#35554] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4526][Open] [PATCH] IO#syswrite releases GVL — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>

3 messages 2011/03/25
[#35559] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4526][Assigned] [PATCH] IO#syswrite releases GVL — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/03/26

[#35705] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4526][Closed] [PATCH] IO#syswrite releases GVL — redmine@... 2011/04/11

[#35555] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4527][Open] [PATCH] IO#close releases GVL if possible — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>

10 messages 2011/03/25
[#63947] [ruby-trunk - Bug #4527] [PATCH] IO#close releases GVL if possible — normalperson@... 2014/07/23

Issue #4527 has been updated by Eric Wong.
[#63948] [ruby-trunk - Bug #4527] [Closed] [PATCH] IO#close releases GVL if possible — naruse@... 2014/07/23

Issue #4527 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#35558] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4527][Assigned] [PATCH] IO#close releases GVL if possible — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/03/26

[#35601] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4527][Closed] [PATCH] IO#close releases GVL if possible — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/04/03

[#35610] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4527][Closed] [PATCH] IO#close releases GVL if possible — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/04/04

Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com> wrote:
[#35704] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4527][Rejected] [PATCH] IO#close releases GVL if possible — redmine@... 2011/04/11

[#63944] [ruby-trunk - Bug #4527] [Assigned] [PATCH] IO#close releases GVL if possible — naruse@... 2014/07/23

Issue #4527 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#63945] [ruby-trunk - Bug #4527] [PATCH] IO#close releases GVL if possible — naruse@... 2014/07/23

Issue #4527 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#63946] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #4527] [PATCH] IO#close releases GVL if possible — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2014/07/23

naruse@airemix.jp wrote:

[#35556] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4528][Open] [PATCH] ext/io/nonblock: avoid unnecessary fcntl F_SETFL calls — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>

3 messages 2011/03/25
[#35557] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4528][Assigned] [PATCH] ext/io/nonblock: avoid unnecessary fcntl F_SETFL calls — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/03/26

[#35786] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4528][Closed] [PATCH] ext/io/nonblock: avoid unnecessary fcntl F_SETFL calls — redmine@... 2011/04/16

[#35560] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4391][Rejected] date/delta tests — tadayoshi funaba <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/03/26

[#35562] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #666] Enumerable::to_hash — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...>

Hi,

1 message 2011/03/27

[#35565] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4531][Open] [PATCH 0/7] use poll() instead of select() in certain cases — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>

33 messages 2011/03/28
[#35569] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4531][Open] [PATCH 0/7] use poll() instead of select() in certain cases — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/03/28

> ref: [ruby-core:35527]
[#35572] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4531][Open] [PATCH 0/7] use poll() instead of select() in certain cases — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/03/28

KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com> wrote:
[#35583] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4531][Open] [PATCH 0/7] use poll() instead of select() in certain cases — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/03/29

2011/3/29 Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>:
[#35585] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4531][Open] [PATCH 0/7] use poll() instead of select() in certain cases — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/03/29

KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com> wrote:
[#35587] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4531][Open] [PATCH 0/7] use poll() instead of select() in certain cases — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/03/29

Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
[#35571] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4531] [PATCH 0/7] use poll() instead of select() in certain cases — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/03/28

[#35954] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4531][PATCH 0/7] use poll() instead of select() in certain cases — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/04/29

[#35956] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4531][PATCH 0/7] use poll() instead of select() in certain cases — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/04/29

Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com> wrote:
[#35975] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4531] [PATCH 0/7] use poll() instead of select() in certain cases — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/05/02

[#35986] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4531] [PATCH 0/7] use poll() instead of select() in certain cases — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/05/03

[#35987] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4531] [PATCH 0/7] use poll() instead of select() in certain cases — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/05/04

[#35988] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4531] [PATCH 0/7] use poll() instead of select() in certain cases — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/05/04

+int
[#35582] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4531] [PATCH 0/7] use poll() instead of select() in certain cases — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/03/29

[#35981] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4531] [PATCH 0/7] use poll() instead of select() in certain cases — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/05/03

[#35982] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4531] [PATCH 0/7] use poll() instead of select() in certain cases — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/05/03

Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com> wrote:
[#35984] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4531] [PATCH 0/7] use poll() instead of select() in certain cases — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/05/03

> My patches don't touch the rb_thread_fd_select() code. hread.c:2393
[#35958] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4531][PATCH 0/7] use poll() instead of select() in certain cases — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/04/30

[#35959] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4531][PATCH 0/7] use poll() instead of select() in certain cases — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/04/30

Comment for patch 2.
[#35960] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4531][PATCH 0/7] use poll() instead of select() in certain cases — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/04/30

KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com> wrote:
[#35963] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4531][PATCH 0/7] use poll() instead of select() in certain cases — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/05/01

>> Also, RB_POLLIN should be avoided.
[#35989] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4531] [PATCH 0/7] use poll() instead of select() in certain cases — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/05/04

[#35990] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4531] [PATCH 0/7] use poll() instead of select() in certain cases — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/05/04

Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com> wrote:
[#36007] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4531] [PATCH 0/7] use poll() instead of select() in certain cases — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/05/04

Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
[#36028] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4531] [PATCH 0/7] use poll() instead of select() in certain cases — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/05/06

> Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
[#35991] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4531] [PATCH 0/7] use poll() instead of select() in certain cases — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/05/04

[#35992] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4531] [PATCH 0/7] use poll() instead of select() in certain cases — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/05/04

diff --git a/ext/-test-/wait_for_single_fd/wait_for_single_fd.c
[#35995] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4531] [PATCH 0/7] use poll() instead of select() in certain cases — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/05/04

KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com> wrote:
[#35998] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4531] [PATCH 0/7] use poll() instead of select() in certain cases — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/05/04

Hi
[#36003] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4531] [PATCH 0/7] use poll() instead of select() in certain cases — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/05/04

[#36029] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4531] [PATCH 0/7] use poll() instead of select() in certain cases — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/05/06

> Issue #4531 has been updated by Eric Wong.
[#36004] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4531] [PATCH 0/7] use poll() instead of select() in certain cases — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/05/04

[#36030] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4531][Closed] [PATCH 0/7] use poll() instead of select() in certain cases — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/05/06

[#35566] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4532][Open] [PATCH] add IO#pread and IO#pwrite methods — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>

12 messages 2011/03/28
[#79289] [Ruby trunk Feature#4532] [PATCH] add IO#pread and IO#pwrite methods — sergey.avseyev@... 2017/01/27

Issue #4532 has been updated by Sergey Avseyev.
[#79290] [Ruby trunk Feature#4532] [PATCH] add IO#pread and IO#pwrite methods — sergey.avseyev@... 2017/01/27

Issue #4532 has been updated by Sergey Avseyev.
[#35570] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4532][Open] [PATCH] add IO#pread and IO#pwrite methods — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/03/28

2011/3/28 Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>:
[#35573] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4532][Open] [PATCH] add IO#pread and IO#pwrite methods — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/03/28

KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com> wrote:
[#35581] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4532][Open] [PATCH] add IO#pread and IO#pwrite methods — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/03/29

2011/3/29 Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>:
[#35584] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4532][Open] [PATCH] add IO#pread and IO#pwrite methods — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/03/29

KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com> wrote:
[#35608] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4532][Assigned] [PATCH] add IO#pread and IO#pwrite methods — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/04/04

[#48348] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4532] [PATCH] add IO#pread and IO#pwrite methods — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...> 2012/10/26

[#79287] [Ruby trunk Feature#4532] [PATCH] add IO#pread and IO#pwrite methods — sergey.avseyev@... 2017/01/27

Issue #4532 has been updated by Sergey Avseyev.
[#79288] [Ruby trunk Feature#4532] [PATCH] add IO#pread and IO#pwrite methods — sergey.avseyev@... 2017/01/27

Issue #4532 has been updated by Sergey Avseyev.
[#80115] [Ruby trunk Feature#4532] [PATCH] add IO#pread and IO#pwrite methods — matz@... 2017/03/13

Issue #4532 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#35567] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4534][Open] ri does not open $PAGER with program name only — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...>

5 messages 2011/03/28
[#36163] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4534][Closed] ri does not open $PAGER with program name only — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2011/05/12

[#35568] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4534][Assigned] ri does not open $PAGER with program name only — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2011/03/28

[#35594] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4534][Assigned] ri does not open $PAGER with program name only — Cezary <cezary.baginski@...> 2011/04/01

+1
[#35595] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4534] ri does not open $PAGER with program name only — Cezary Baginski <cezary.baginski@...> 2011/04/01

[#35574] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4535][Open] [PATCH] fix race in blocking send_io/recv_io — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>

6 messages 2011/03/28
[#36949] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4535][Open] [PATCH] fix race in blocking send_io/recv_io — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/06/10

Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
[#35575] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4535] [PATCH] fix race in blocking send_io/recv_io — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/03/28

[#36008] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4535][Open] [PATCH] fix race in blocking send_io/recv_io — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/05/04

Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
[#37005] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4535][Assigned] [PATCH] fix race in blocking send_io/recv_io — Koichi Sasada <redmine@...> 2011/06/11

[#37123] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4535][Closed] [PATCH] fix race in blocking send_io/recv_io — Akira Tanaka <akr@...> 2011/06/13

[#35576] all of dir.c holds GVL — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>

Hello, I noticed everything in dir.c holds onto the GVL.

3 messages 2011/03/29
[#36922] Re: all of dir.c holds GVL — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2011/06/10

Hi,
[#36951] Re: all of dir.c holds GVL — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/06/10

SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:

[#35577] Stupid Question 999.9!! — Charles Thornton <admin@...>

OK, Stupid Question 999.9

2 messages 2011/03/29
[#35579] Re: Stupid Question 999.9!! — Loren Segal <lsegal@...> 2011/03/29

[#35578] Stupid Question 999.9 — Charles Thornton <admin@...>

OK, Stupid Question 999.9

2 messages 2011/03/29
[#35588] Re: Stupid Question 999.9 — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2011/03/29

[#35580] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4502][Assigned] strange Module.new behaviour — Shyouhei Urabe <shyouhei@...>

1 message 2011/03/29

[#35586] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4538][Open] [PATCH (cleanup)] avoid unnecessary select() calls before doing I/O — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>

9 messages 2011/03/29
[#35590] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4538] [PATCH (cleanup)] avoid unnecessary select() calls before doing I/O — Charles Nutter <headius@...> 2011/03/31

[#35593] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4538] [PATCH (cleanup)] avoid unnecessary select() calls before doing I/O — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/03/31

Charles Nutter <headius@headius.com> wrote:
[#36937] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4538][Assigned] [PATCH (cleanup)] avoid unnecessary select() calls before doing I/O — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/06/10

[#35596] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4538] [PATCH (cleanup)] avoid unnecessary select() calls before doing I/O — Charles Nutter <headius@...> 2011/04/01

[#35598] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4538] [PATCH (cleanup)] avoid unnecessary select() calls before doing I/O — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/04/01

Charles Nutter <headius@headius.com> wrote:
[#35600] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4538] [PATCH (cleanup)] avoid unnecessary select() calls before doing I/O — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/04/02

On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
[#35609] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4538] [PATCH (cleanup)] avoid unnecessary select() calls before doing I/O — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/04/04

Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@headius.com> wrote:
[#36925] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4538][Open] [PATCH (cleanup)] avoid unnecessary select() calls before doing I/O — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2011/06/10

Hi,

[#35589] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4540][Open] ext/-test-/string/extconf.rb is missing in Ruby 1.9.2 — Yutaka HARA <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/03/30

[#35591] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4542][Open] test_threaded_flush sometimes fails — Yutaka HARA <redmine@...>

2 messages 2011/03/31
[#35611] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4542] test_threaded_flush sometimes fails — Yutaka HARA <redmine@...> 2011/04/05

[#35592] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4545][Open] [PATCH] syslog extension documentation improvements and fixes — Jonas Pfenniger <jonas@...>

3 messages 2011/03/31
[#35603] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4545] [PATCH] syslog extension documentation improvements and fixes — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <nagachika00@...> 2011/04/03

[#35604] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4545][Closed] [PATCH] syslog extension documentation improvements and fixes — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <nagachika00@...> 2011/04/03

[ruby-core:35409] Re: Why are hash keys sometimes duped?

From: Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>
Date: 2011-03-02 01:38:01 UTC
List: ruby-core #35409 
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 09:04:44AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Eric, your guess is correct.  It's a compromise between mutable
> strings and rehashing.

This makes me wonder, is rehashing more expensive than allocating a new
string?

Are string mutations so common that allocating a new string object is
cheaper?

It seems there must be a point where extra time spent in GC and extra
time spent allocating strings would overcome the cost of rehashing.

I guess I'd better study st.c more closely.

-- 
Aaron Patterson
http://tenderlovemaking.com/

In This Thread

Prev Next