[#33000] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4014][Open] Case-Sensitivity of Property Names Depends on Regexp Encoding — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #4014: Case-Sensitivity of Property Names Depends on Regexp Encoding

11 messages 2010/11/01

[#33021] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4015][Open] File::DIRECT Constant for O_DIRECT — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

Hi,

15 messages 2010/11/02

[#33139] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4044][Open] Regex matching errors when using \W character class and /i option — Ben Hoskings <redmine@...>

Bug #4044: Regex matching errors when using \W character class and /i option

8 messages 2010/11/11

[#33162] Windows Unicode (chcp 65001) Generates incorrect output — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>

Hello,

10 messages 2010/11/14

[#33246] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4068][Open] Replace current standard Date/DateTime library with home_run — Jeremy Evans <redmine@...>

Feature #4068: Replace current standard Date/DateTime library with home_run

40 messages 2010/11/17

[#33255] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4071][Open] support basic auth for Net::HTTP.get requests — "coderrr ." <redmine@...>

Feature #4071: support basic auth for Net::HTTP.get requests

23 messages 2010/11/19

[#33322] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4085][Open] Refinements and nested methods — Shugo Maeda <redmine@...>

Feature #4085: Refinements and nested methods

94 messages 2010/11/24
[#33345] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4085][Open] Refinements and nested methods — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/11/25

Hi,

[#33356] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4085][Open] Refinements and nested methods — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2010/11/25

Hi,

[#33375] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4085][Open] Refinements and nested methods — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/11/25

Hi,

[#33381] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4085][Open] Refinements and nested methods — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2010/11/25

Hi,

[#33387] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4085][Open] Refinements and nested methods — Magnus Holm <judofyr@...> 2010/11/25

Woah, this is very nice stuff! Some comments/questions:

[#33487] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4085][Open] Refinements and nested methods — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2010/11/30

This is a long response, and for that I apologize. I want to make sure

[#33535] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4085][Open] Refinements and nested methods — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/12/03

Hi,

[#33519] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4085][Open] Refinements and nested methods — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2010/12/02

Hi,

[#33523] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4085][Open] Refinements and nested methods — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/12/02

Hi,

[#33539] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4085][Open] Refinements and nested methods — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2010/12/03

Hi,

[#33543] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4085][Open] Refinements and nested methods — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/12/03

Hi,

[#33546] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4085][Open] Refinements and nested methods — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2010/12/03

Hi,

[#33548] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4085][Open] Refinements and nested methods — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/12/03

Hi,

[#33567] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4085][Open] Refinements and nested methods — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2010/12/04

Hi,

[#33595] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4085][Open] Refinements and nested methods — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2010/12/06

On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 6:32 AM, Shugo Maeda <shugo@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#33367] Planning to release 1.8.7 fixes on 12/25 (Japanese timezone) — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>

Hello,

20 messages 2010/11/25
[#33439] Re: Planning to release 1.8.7 fixes on 12/25 (Japanese timezone) — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2010/11/27

2010/11/25 Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org>:

[#33456] [Request for Comment] avoid timer thread — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>

Hi,

25 messages 2010/11/29
[#35152] Re: [Request for Comment] avoid timer thread — Mark Somerville <mark@...> 2011/02/08

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:53:03AM +0900, SASADA Koichi wrote:

[#36077] Re: [Request for Comment] avoid timer thread — Mark Somerville <mark@...> 2011/05/09

On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 09:24:13PM +0900, Mark Somerville wrote:

[#36952] Re: [Request for Comment] avoid timer thread — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/06/10

Mark Somerville <mark@scottishclimbs.com> wrote:

[#37080] Re: [Request for Comment] avoid timer thread — Mark Somerville <mark@...> 2011/06/13

On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 05:57:11AM +0900, Eric Wong wrote:

[#37103] Re: [Request for Comment] avoid timer thread — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/06/13

Mark Somerville <mark@scottishclimbs.com> wrote:

[#37187] Re: [Request for Comment] avoid timer thread — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2011/06/16

(2011/06/14 3:37), Eric Wong wrote:

[#37195] Re: [Request for Comment] avoid timer thread — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/06/17

SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:

[#37205] Re: [Request for Comment] avoid timer thread — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/06/17

Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:

[#33469] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4100][Open] Improve Net::HTTP documentation — Eric Hodel <redmine@...>

Feature #4100: Improve Net::HTTP documentation

12 messages 2010/11/29

[ruby-core:33364] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4071] support basic auth for Net::HTTP.get requests

From: Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...>
Date: 2010-11-25 06:11:46 UTC
List: ruby-core #33364
Hi,

On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Yui NARUSE <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
>> If I understand correctly, Yui, your argument is that user & password should not have been part of the URI::HTTP class. That may be true, but I fear it is too late to change that.
>
> No.

No to which sentence?

>> Given the fact that URI may have user & password information, I would also prefer if Net::HTTP.get took it into account. Maybe there is something I don't understand, because I think it should also respect a https URI (I should open a different ticket for this).
>
> Did you read this thread?

I'm not sure if you are seriously implying that I didn't read the
thread, but in case it needs to be said: yes, of course, I did, and I
would be grateful if, in the future, you always assumed that I read
the full thread before replying.

Although your question follows two sentences, I can only imagine that
it may not have been clear that by "also" (first sentence), I was
referring to the position of the original poster? I could have been
more clear and never meant to imply you agreed to this. Indeed, I
would not have replied if you didn't need convincing!

If your question is not about the word "also" but about any other
word(s) in the two sentences, then I'll need some more explanation.

--
Marc-Andr

In This Thread