[#33640] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4136][Open] Enumerable#reject should not inherit the receiver's instance variables — Hiro Asari <redmine@...>

Bug #4136: Enumerable#reject should not inherit the receiver's instance variables

10 messages 2010/12/08

[#33667] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4149][Open] Documentation submission: syslog standard library — mathew murphy <redmine@...>

Bug #4149: Documentation submission: syslog standard library

11 messages 2010/12/10

[#33683] [feature:trunk] Enumerable#categorize — Tanaka Akira <akr@...>

Hi.

14 messages 2010/12/12
[#33684] Re: [feature:trunk] Enumerable#categorize — "Martin J. Dst" <duerst@...> 2010/12/12

[#33687] Towards a standardized AST for Ruby code — Magnus Holm <judofyr@...>

Hey folks,

23 messages 2010/12/12
[#33688] Re: Towards a standardized AST for Ruby code — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2010/12/12

On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Magnus Holm <judofyr@gmail.com> wrote:

[#33689] Re: Towards a standardized AST for Ruby code — "Haase, Konstantin" <Konstantin.Haase@...> 2010/12/12

On Dec 12, 2010, at 17:46 , Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:

[#33763] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168][Open] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9 — Brian Durand <redmine@...>

Bug #4168: WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9

43 messages 2010/12/17

[#33815] trunk warnflags build issue with curb 0.7.9? — Jon <jon.forums@...>

As this may turn out to be a 3rd party issue rather than a bug, I'd like some feedback.

11 messages 2010/12/22

[#33833] Ruby 1.9.2 is going to be released — "Yuki Sonoda (Yugui)" <yugui@...>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

15 messages 2010/12/23

[#33846] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4197][Open] Improvement of the benchmark library — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...>

Feature #4197: Improvement of the benchmark library

15 messages 2010/12/23

[#33910] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4211][Open] Converting the Ruby and C API documentation to YARD syntax — Loren Segal <redmine@...>

Feature #4211: Converting the Ruby and C API documentation to YARD syntax

10 messages 2010/12/26

[#33923] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4214][Open] Fiddle::WINDOWS == false on Windows — Jon Forums <redmine@...>

Bug #4214: Fiddle::WINDOWS == false on Windows

15 messages 2010/12/27

[ruby-core:33615] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4085][Open] Refinements and nested methods

From: "Haase, Konstantin" <Konstantin.Haase@...>
Date: 2010-12-07 08:58:52 UTC
List: ruby-core #33615
Since I explained one use case I'd have for local rebinding: I think not having local rebinding is mostly what we want, local rebinding would mostly cause unwanted side effects and would be a pure horror to debug.

Konstantin

On Dec 7, 2010, at 09:52 , Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> In message "Re: [ruby-core:33610] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4085][Open] Refinements and nested methods"
>    on Tue, 7 Dec 2010 16:08:28 +0900, Shugo Maeda <shugo@ruby-lang.org> writes:
> 
> |I don't mean to merge refinements into trunk without Matz's permission.
> |I guess he's still wondering whether we need local rebinding.
> 
> I do not object local rebinding (yet).  In fact, I am slightly
> negative against it.  I am waiting for someone to try persuade me for
> local rebinding, despite its potential performance penalty.  No one
> has ever tried yet.
> 
> 							matz.
> 


In This Thread