From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Date: 2010-11-24T07:24:49+09:00
Subject: [ruby-core:33309] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4068] Replace current standard Date/DateTime library with home_run

Hi,

In message "Re: [ruby-core:33303] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4068] Replace current standard Date/DateTime library with home_run"
    on Wed, 24 Nov 2010 02:12:10 +0900, Jeremy Evans <redmine@ruby-lang.org> writes:

|It would be very much preferable to have either one of the following happen:
|
|1) A flat out rejection of having home_run replace the current date standard library, even if no explanation is given.
|2) An agreement for having home_run replace the current date standard library, with specific conditions.
|
|Leaving this ticket open with no indication about how to ready home_run for acceptance is the worst case.

I also would like to hear the reason behind objection against
replacement, if home_run is compatible enough.

							matz.