[#18436] [ANN] Ruby 1.9.1 feature freeze — "Yugui (Yuki Sonoda)" <yugui@...>

Hi all,

81 messages 2008/09/02
[#18667] Re: [ANN] Ruby 1.9.1 feature freeze — "Yusuke ENDOH" <mame@...> 2008/09/17

Hi,

[#18847] Re: [ANN] Ruby 1.9.1 feature freeze — "Yugui (Yuki Sonoda)" <yugui@...> 2008/09/24

Hi, Yusuke

[#18848] Re: [ANN] Ruby 1.9.1 feature freeze — "Yusuke ENDOH" <mame@...> 2008/09/24

Hi,

[#18886] Re: [ANN] Ruby 1.9.1 feature freeze — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2008/09/25

[#18889] Re: [ANN] Ruby 1.9.1 feature freeze — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2008/09/25

Ryan Davis wrote:

[#18906] Re: [ANN] Ruby 1.9.1 feature freeze — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/09/25

[#18908] Re: [ANN] Ruby 1.9.1 feature freeze — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2008/09/25

Dave Thomas wrote:

[#19032] Re: [ANN] Ruby 1.9.1 feature freeze — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2008/09/30

[#19036] Re: [ANN] Ruby 1.9.1 feature freeze — Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@...> 2008/09/30

[#19039] Re: [ANN] Ruby 1.9.1 feature freeze — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2008/09/30

[#19042] Re: [ANN] Ruby 1.9.1 feature freeze — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/09/30

[#19195] Re: [ANN] Ruby 1.9.1 feature freeze — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2008/10/08

[#19202] Re: [ANN] Ruby 1.9.1 feature freeze — "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...> 2008/10/08

On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 3:05 AM, Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com> wrote=

[#19203] Re: [ANN] Ruby 1.9.1 feature freeze — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/10/08

On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 09:28:22PM +0900, Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#18452] [ANN] Ruby 1.9.1 feature freeze — "Roger Pack" <rogerpack2005@...>

Would it be possible to have a few patches applied before freeze [if

27 messages 2008/09/04
[#18471] Re: [ANN] Ruby 1.9.1 feature freeze — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/09/06

Hi,

[#18490] Re: [ANN] Ruby 1.9.1 feature freeze — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/09/08

Hi,

[#18486] Ruby 1.9 strings & character encoding — "Michael Selig" <michael.selig@...>

Firstly, I apologise if I am going over old ground here - I haven't been

39 messages 2008/09/08
[#18492] Re: Ruby 1.9 strings & character encoding — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/09/08

Hi,

[#18494] Re: Ruby 1.9 strings & character encoding — "Michael Selig" <michael.selig@...> 2008/09/08

On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:45:36 +1000, Yukihiro Matsumoto

[#18499] Re: Ruby 1.9 strings & character encoding — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2008/09/08

Hi,

[#18500] Re: Ruby 1.9 strings & character encoding — Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@...> 2008/09/08

On Sep 8, 2008, at 10:43 AM, NARUSE, Yui wrote:

[#18515] Re: Ruby 1.9 strings & character encoding — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/09/09

# First off, I'm neutral to this issue

[#18530] Re: Ruby 1.9 strings & character encoding — Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@...> 2008/09/10

On Sep 8, 2008, at 9:06 PM, Urabe Shyouhei wrote:

[#18533] Re: Ruby 1.9 strings & character encoding — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2008/09/10

In article <3119E5AB-AEC8-4FEE-B2FA-8C75482E0E9D@sun.com>,

[#18504] Re: Ruby 1.9 strings & character encoding — "Michael Selig" <michael.selig@...> 2008/09/09

On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 03:43:54 +1000, NARUSE, Yui <naruse@airemix.jp> wrote:

[#18572] Working on CSV's Encoding Support — James Gray <james@...>

I'm trying to get the standard CSV library ready for m17n in Ruby

23 messages 2008/09/13
[#18575] Re: Working on CSV's Encoding Support — James Gray <james@...> 2008/09/14

On Sep 13, 2008, at 5:39 PM, James Gray wrote:

[#18576] Re: Working on CSV's Encoding Support — "Michael Selig" <michael.selig@...> 2008/09/14

On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 14:48:47 +1000, James Gray <james@grayproductions.net>

[#18640] Character encodings - a radical suggestion — "Michael Selig" <michael.selig@...>

Hi,

89 messages 2008/09/17
[#18643] Re: Character encodings - a radical suggestion — James Gray <james@...> 2008/09/17

On Sep 16, 2008, at 8:20 PM, Michael Selig wrote:

[#18647] Re: Character encodings - a radical suggestion — "Michael Selig" <michael.selig@...> 2008/09/17

On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 12:51:14 +1000, James Gray <james@grayproductions.net>

[#18658] Re: Character encodings - a radical suggestion — James Gray <james@...> 2008/09/17

On Sep 16, 2008, at 11:21 PM, Michael Selig wrote:

[#18660] Re: Character encodings - a radical suggestion — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2008/09/17

Hi,

[#18663] Re: Character encodings - a radical suggestion — Matthias Wächter <matthias@...> 2008/09/17

On 9/17/2008 3:39 PM, NARUSE, Yui wrote:

[#18666] Re: Character encodings - a radical suggestion — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/09/17

Hi,

[#18728] Re: Character encodings - a radical suggestion — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2008/09/19

At 00:01 08/09/18, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#18729] Re: Character encodings - a radical suggestion — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/09/19

Hi,

[#18732] Re: Character encodings - a radical suggestion — "Michael Selig" <michael.selig@...> 2008/09/19

On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 18:24:41 +1000, Yukihiro Matsumoto

[#18734] Re: Character encodings - a radical suggestion — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/09/19

Oops, I misfired my mail reader; the following is the right one:

[#18751] Re: Character encodings - a radical suggestion — "Michael Selig" <michael.selig@...> 2008/09/20

On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 19:52:30 +1000, Yukihiro Matsumoto

[#18761] Re: Character encodings - a radical suggestion — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/09/20

Hi,

[#18774] Re: Character encodings - a radical suggestion — "Michael Selig" <michael.selig@...> 2008/09/21

On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 02:05:30 +1000, Yukihiro Matsumoto

[#18776] Re: Character encodings - a less radical suggestion — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2008/09/22

Hello Michael,

[#18664] Re: Character encodings - a radical suggestion — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/09/17

Hi,

[#18762] [Feature #578] add method to disassemble Proc objects — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Feature #578: add method to disassemble Proc objects

17 messages 2008/09/20

[#18872] [RIP] Guy Decoux. — "Jean-Fran輟is Tr穗" <jftran@...>

Hello,

14 messages 2008/09/24

[#18899] refute_{equal, match, nil, same} is not useful — Fujioka <fuj@...>

Hi,

27 messages 2008/09/25

[#18937] A stupid question... — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

Just what was wrong with Test::Unit? Sure, it was slightly bloated.

25 messages 2008/09/25
[#18941] Re: A stupid question... — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2008/09/25

> -----Original Message-----

[#19004] Let Ruby be Ruby — Trans <transfire@...> 2008/09/28

[#18986] miniunit problems and release of Ruby 1.9.0-5 — "Yugui (Yuki Sonoda)" <yugui@...>

Hi,

14 messages 2008/09/27

[#19043] Ruby is "stealing" names from operating system API:s — "Johan Holmberg" <johan556@...>

Hi!

13 messages 2008/09/30

[ruby-core:18520] Re: rubylex-analyzer?

From: Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
Date: 2008-09-09 18:20:26 UTC
List: ruby-core #18520
On Sep 9, 2008, at 01:17 , C.E. Thornton wrote:

> I am trying to understand the "state equipped scanner"
> -- tough going !
>
> The hackers Guide mentions a program
> 'rubylex-analyzer' that should help make
> understanding it easier..
>
> Does it still exist and will it help??

That is probably '-y'. I don't find it helpful except when I'm  
debugging my ruby_parser and even then it is painful. Note, this  
output is both lexer and parser output:

% ruby -y -e 'p 1 + 1'

Starting parse
Entering state 0
Reducing stack by rule 1 (line 346):
-> $$ = nterm @1 ()
Stack now 0
Entering state 2
Reading a token: Next token is token tIDENTIFIER ()
Shifting token tIDENTIFIER ()
Entering state 34
Reading a token: Next token is token tINTEGER ()
Reducing stack by rule 477 (line 2439):
    $1 = token tIDENTIFIER ()
-> $$ = nterm operation ()
Stack now 0 2
Entering state 94
Next token is token tINTEGER ()
Reducing stack by rule 253 (line 1392):
-> $$ = nterm @8 ()
Stack now 0 2 94
Entering state 246
Next token is token tINTEGER ()
Shifting token tINTEGER ()
Entering state 40
Reducing stack by rule 415 (line 2176):
    $1 = token tINTEGER ()
-> $$ = nterm numeric ()
Stack now 0 2 94 246
Entering state 89
Reducing stack by rule 377 (line 1933):
    $1 = nterm numeric ()
-> $$ = nterm literal ()
Stack now 0 2 94 246
Entering state 79
Reducing stack by rule 268 (line 1454):
    $1 = nterm literal ()
-> $$ = nterm primary ()
Stack now 0 2 94 246
Entering state 75
Reading a token: Next token is token '+' ()
Reducing stack by rule 218 (line 1232):
    $1 = nterm primary ()
-> $$ = nterm arg ()
Stack now 0 2 94 246
Entering state 235
Next token is token '+' ()
Shifting token '+' ()
Entering state 337
Reading a token: Next token is token tINTEGER ()
Shifting token tINTEGER ()
Entering state 40
Reducing stack by rule 415 (line 2176):
    $1 = token tINTEGER ()
-> $$ = nterm numeric ()
Stack now 0 2 94 246 235 337
Entering state 89
Reducing stack by rule 377 (line 1933):
    $1 = nterm numeric ()
-> $$ = nterm literal ()
Stack now 0 2 94 246 235 337
Entering state 79
Reducing stack by rule 268 (line 1454):
    $1 = nterm literal ()
-> $$ = nterm primary ()
Stack now 0 2 94 246 235 337
Entering state 75
Reading a token: Next token is token '\n' ()
Reducing stack by rule 218 (line 1232):
    $1 = nterm primary ()
-> $$ = nterm arg ()
Stack now 0 2 94 246 235 337
Entering state 512
Next token is token '\n' ()
Reducing stack by rule 186 (line 1101):
    $1 = nterm arg ()
    $2 = token '+' ()
    $3 = nterm arg ()
-> $$ = nterm arg ()
Stack now 0 2 94 246
Entering state 235
Next token is token '\n' ()
Reducing stack by rule 219 (line 1238):
    $1 = nterm arg ()
-> $$ = nterm arg_value ()
Stack now 0 2 94 246
Entering state 236
Next token is token '\n' ()
Reducing stack by rule 263 (line 1430):
    $1 = nterm arg_value ()
-> $$ = nterm args ()
Stack now 0 2 94 246
Entering state 239
Next token is token '\n' ()
Reducing stack by rule 500 (line 2480):
-> $$ = nterm none ()
Stack now 0 2 94 246 239
Entering state 408
Reducing stack by rule 262 (line 1427):
    $1 = nterm none ()
-> $$ = nterm opt_block_arg ()
Stack now 0 2 94 246 239
Entering state 407
Reducing stack by rule 233 (line 1300):
    $1 = nterm args ()
    $2 = nterm opt_block_arg ()
-> $$ = nterm call_args ()
Stack now 0 2 94 246
Entering state 414
Reducing stack by rule 255 (line 1404):
    $1 = nterm call_args ()
-> $$ = nterm open_args ()
Stack now 0 2 94 246
Entering state 415
Reducing stack by rule 254 (line 1392):
    $1 = nterm @8 ()
    $2 = nterm open_args ()
-> $$ = nterm command_args ()
Stack now 0 2 94
Entering state 354
Next token is token '\n' ()
Reducing stack by rule 53 (line 683):
    $1 = nterm operation ()
    $2 = nterm command_args ()
-> $$ = nterm command ()
Stack now 0 2
Entering state 67
Next token is token '\n' ()
Reducing stack by rule 42 (line 641):
    $1 = nterm command ()
-> $$ = nterm command_call ()
Stack now 0 2
Entering state 65
Reducing stack by rule 35 (line 614):
    $1 = nterm command_call ()
-> $$ = nterm expr ()
Stack now 0 2
Entering state 64
Next token is token '\n' ()
Reducing stack by rule 34 (line 611):
    $1 = nterm expr ()
-> $$ = nterm stmt ()
Stack now 0 2
Entering state 63
Next token is token '\n' ()
Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 399):
    $1 = nterm stmt ()
-> $$ = nterm stmts ()
Stack now 0 2
Entering state 62
Next token is token '\n' ()
Shifting token '\n' ()
Entering state 216
Reducing stack by rule 497 (line 2473):
    $1 = token '\n' ()
-> $$ = nterm term ()
Stack now 0 2 62
Entering state 220
Reducing stack by rule 498 (line 2476):
    $1 = nterm term ()
-> $$ = nterm terms ()
Stack now 0 2 62
Entering state 300
Reading a token: Now at end of input.
Reducing stack by rule 490 (line 2460):
    $1 = nterm terms ()
-> $$ = nterm opt_terms ()
Stack now 0 2 62
Entering state 299
Reducing stack by rule 4 (line 391):
    $1 = nterm stmts ()
    $2 = nterm opt_terms ()
-> $$ = nterm compstmt ()
Stack now 0 2
Entering state 61
Reducing stack by rule 2 (line 346):
    $1 = nterm @1 ()
    $2 = nterm compstmt ()
-> $$ = nterm program ()
Stack now 0
Entering state 1
Now at end of input.
Stack now 0 1
Cleanup: popping nterm program ()
2


In This Thread

Prev Next