From: Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Date: 2008-10-04T00:36:15+09:00
Subject: [ruby-core:19123] Re: [ANN] Ruby 1.9.1 feature freeze


On Oct 3, 2008, at 9:37 AM, Austin Ziegler wrote:

> If we want 1.9.1 to be a binary API feature freeze, why don't we push
> the release date back, rather than pushing the binary API feature
> freeze back a version?

I know what you're saying. But I'm also seeing a process that  
seemingly has no end. I worry that we're falling into the Mr Creosote  
syndrome�just one more wafer-thin change.


Dave