[#19064] Fwd: [ruby-dev:36523] Re: Encoding.default_internal — Martin Duerst <duerst@...>
There has been some disconnect lately between ruby-dev and ruby-core
On Oct 1, 2008, at 5:09 AM, Martin Duerst wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 9:46 AM, James Gray <james@grayproductions.net> wrote:
[#19075] Request For Removal: No Operator Concatenation — James Gray <james@...>
I'm disappointed that Ruby still supports this goofy syntax:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 1:58 PM, James Gray <james@grayproductions.net> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 1:08 PM, Gregory Brown <gregory.t.brown@gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 1, 2008, at 1:15 PM, Jim Freeze wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 1:29 PM, James Gray <james@grayproductions.net> wrote:
On Oct 1, 2008, at 1:37 PM, Jim Freeze wrote:
On Oct 1, 2008, at 11:42 AM, James Gray wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 2:45 PM, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Gregory Brown <gregory.t.brown@gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 1, 2008, at 2:17 PM, Jim Freeze wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 2:25 PM, James Gray <james@grayproductions.net> wrote:
On Oct 1, 2008, at 12:30 PM, Jim Freeze wrote:
Hi,
On Oct 1, 2008, at 10:33 PM, Yusuke ENDOH wrote:
[#19127] Autoload and class definition — Tomas Matousek <Tomas.Matousek@...>
I've found an interesting corner case of autoload behavior, which I think is wrong.
[#19132] [Feature #615] "with" operator — Lavir the Whiolet <redmine@...>
Feature #615: "with" operator
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 10:46:49AM +0900, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 10:56:23PM +0900, Paul Brannan wrote:
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Trans <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi --
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 05:47:23AM +0900, David A. Black wrote:
Hi --
[#19168] [Bug:1.9] rubygems depend on test/unit/ui/console/testrunner — "Yusuke ENDOH" <mame@...>
Hi,
On Oct 7, 2008, at 07:43 AM, Yusuke ENDOH wrote:
Eric Hodel wrote:
[#19225] Module.freeze vs Object.freeze — Curt Hagenlocher <curth@...>
What's the difference between Module.freeze and Object.freeze? They seem to have the same effect.
[#19242] Regexp Order Matters in 1.9 — James Gray <james@...>
I'm just curious, why does this work:
[#19250] default_internal encoding — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
I'm documenting default_internal for the PickAxe, and have a couple of
Hi,
On Oct 9, 2008, at 6:06 PM, Michael Selig wrote:
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 13:09:31 +1100, James Gray <james@grayproductions.net>
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Paul Brannan <pbrannan / atdesk.com> wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 10:30:31AM +0900, Michael Selig wrote:
Paul Brannan wrote:
Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#19294] [Bug #634] Time parsing works in 1.8 but not 1.9 — Aaron Patterson <redmine@...>
Bug #634: Time parsing works in 1.8 but not 1.9
Issue #634 has been updated by tadayoshi funaba.
[#19298] [Feature #639] New String#encode_internal method — Michael Selig <redmine@...>
Feature #639: New String#encode_internal method
Hi,
[#19304] 1.9, encoding & win32 wide char support — Lloyd Hilaiel <lloyd@...>
hello,
[#19315] [Feature #643] __DIR__ — Thomas Sawyer <redmine@...>
Feature #643: __DIR__
[#19332] Can I confirm a change to source file encoding — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
A month ago, if I had
[#19342] [Bug #649] Memory leak in a array assignment? — Henri Suur-Inkeroinen <redmine@...>
Bug #649: Memory leak in a array assignment?
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Brent Roman <brent@mbari.org> wrote:
[#19343] Yet another block semantic/syntax question — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Hi --
[#19350] Net::HTTP.post_form bug : can't post form to correct uri which contains QueryString(QueryString part are lost) and revise — Klesh <kleshwong@...>
Hi,
You are trying to use GET-style query params instead of POSTing the
Dear Matt
From my experience, it's simply easier to process requests that way,
Thanks,
2008/10/17 Matt Todd <chiology@gmail.com>:
On Oct 19, 2008, at 8:55 AM, mathew wrote:
[#19373] capture_io in minitest — Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
capture_io changes $stdout.fileno.
[#19378] Constant names in 1.9 — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
When Ruby makes the tIDENTIFIER/tCONSTANT test, it looks to see if the
Hi,
On Oct 18, 2008, at 8:32 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
[#19385] [Bug #657] Thread.new { fork } — "James M. Lawrence" <redmine@...>
Bug #657: Thread.new { fork }
[#19388] [Bug #663] Benchmark.measure outputs different result when executed using command line "ruby -e ..." — Artem Vorozhtsov <redmine@...>
Bug #663: Benchmark.measure outputs different result when executed using command line "ruby -e ..."
[#19397] [Feature #666] Enumerable::to_hash — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>
Feature #666: Enumerable::to_hash
Issue #666 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.
Hi,
Thank you for this explanation. If I understand correctly, you want methods
Hi,
Thank you for your response
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 05:45:06 +0900
[#19410] rb_errinfo() vs rb_rubylevel_errinfo() — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>
What is the difference between these two functions?
Hi,
[#19413] Is this expected, or should I report it? — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Given
[#19422] Now that lambda has more powerful arguments... — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
is there anything that
Dave Thomas schrieb:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 04:01:45AM +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:
Hi --
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 04:38:19AM +0900, David A. Black wrote:
Hi --
On Oct 21, 2008, at 4:24 PM, David A. Black wrote:
Hi --
[#19446] confused by this catch table — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>
irb(main):001:0> require 'internal/proc'
[#19458] Should Method@instance_methods reveal protected methods? — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
The RDoc says it just returns public methods, but
[#19465] [Bug #680] csv.rb: CSV.parse is too late when encoding is mismatch — Takeyuki Fujioka <redmine@...>
Bug #680: csv.rb: CSV.parse is too late when encoding is mismatch
Hi,
A default for the source encoding has been discussed quite a long
On Oct 24, 2008, at 1:52 AM, Martin Duerst wrote:
On Oct 24, 2008, at 8:06 AM, James Gray wrote:
On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 00:07:13 +1100, James Gray <james@grayproductions.net>
On Oct 26, 2008, at 6:48 PM, Michael Selig wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 17:26:32 +1100, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org>
Hi,
On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 23:34:26 +1100, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org>
Hi,
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:07:54 +1100, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org>
Hi,
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:27:57 +1100, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org>
Hi,
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:55:32 +1100, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org>
Hi,
On Oct 27, 2008, at 7:07 AM, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
Hi,
[#19468] [Bug:1.9] failures of test/minitest — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
Hi,
[#19478] Ruby 1.8.7 Throwing "Too many open files" Exception lately??? — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>
Group,
[#19487] [ANN] Sipper 1.1.3 Released — "Nasir Khan" <rubylearner@...>
1.1.3 of SIPr pronounced as Sipper has been released earlier this month.
[#19504] Is the stabby proc gone? broken? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Hi --
[#19523] Too Many Files Error -- Test Case Produced. — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>
Core,
[#19555] Managing 1.9 threads in extensions — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
I'm trying to pin down the rules for folks who write extensions for
[#19561] Was there a feature freeze on October 25th? — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Curious authors want to know... :)
[#19564] Ruby 1.9.1 preview1 is out — "Yugui (Yuki Sonoda)" <yugui@...>
Hi all,
[#19566] GC thought — "Roger Pack" <roger.pack@...>
Here is a recent patch I've been experimenting with--for any advice. [1]
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:02:17 +0900, Roger Pack wrote:
> Letting the program continue execution during the mark phase could cause
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 01:04:52AM +0900, Roger Pack wrote:
2008/10/28 Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com>:
Robert Klemme wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 4:02 AM, Hongli Lai <hongli@plan99.net> wrote:
[#19578] [Bug #691] Time::zone_utc? does not follow rfc2822 — Chun Wang <redmine@...>
Bug #691: Time::zone_utc? does not follow rfc2822
[#19583] [Bug #694] eof? call on a pty IO object causes application to exit — Dave Thomas <redmine@...>
Bug #694: eof? call on a pty IO object causes application to exit
[#19590] [Feature #695] More flexibility when combining ASCII-8BIT strings with other encodings — Michael Selig <redmine@...>
Feature #695: More flexibility when combining ASCII-8BIT strings with other encodings
Hi,
At 07:14 08/10/31, Michael Selig wrote:
Hi
[#19599] Future of Continuations — "r. schempp" <ruben.schempp@...>
Hi,
r. schempp schrieb:
r. schempp schrieb:
[#19604] test failure in r20022 — Mike Stok <mike@...>
I noticed this failure in my morning build of ruby trunk on my laptop:
[#19610] [Bug 1.9] gem_prelude.rb always require rubygems — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Hi,
[#19618] Result of backticks — Jim Deville <jdeville@...>
`echo disc world` returns "disc world\n"
[#19634] performance issues with --enable-pthread on Solaris. — Paul van den Bogaard <Paul.Vandenbogaard@...>
Introduction
[#19660] Odd TypeError in inject (1.9.1 preview 1) — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Hi --
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 5:20 AM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 8:40 AM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org>wrote:
[#19668] [Bug #703] string output duplication occurs if the same file descriptor written to in different threads — Roger Pack <redmine@...>
Bug #703: string output duplication occurs if the same file descriptor written to in different threads
Hi,
[ruby-core:19113] Re: [ANN] Ruby 1.9.1 feature freeze
Hi, How about reconsidering the feature freeze plan. Yugui (Yuki Sonoda) wrote: > As announced before, Ruby 1.9.1 features will be frozen on 25 September. > > After the time, > * Ruby level APIs must not changed. > * C level APIs will must not changed without discussion on > ruby-core/ruby-dev. > * All structures, data types, variables, functions and macros in > include/ruby/*.h are regarded as public C level APIs. > * Move it from include/ruby/*.h anything you want not to publish. > > And I will create the ruby_1_9_1 branch and release 1.9.1 RC1 on 25 > October. After the time, > * C level APIs will must not changed. > > Also the C level APIs of 1.9.x must have backward binary-compatibility > to 1.9.1. When this plan is decided in July, it was based on the assumption that most feature of Ruby 1.9 was already fixed and we could spend time to make ruby stable. However, Ruby is still changing now and near future. This is because * Ruby 1.9 haven't used in large applications yet. * too radical changes of some libraries We need more review to Ruby core and libraries. This gap is enough to break the assumption. So how about reconsidering the feature freeze plan. But continual release is important for feedbacks. My new plan is, * Ruby 1.9.1 will be released in 2008-12-25. * Ruby 1.9.1 doesn't assure ABI Compatibility to future Ruby 1.9 series. * Ruby 1.9.2 may break compatibility to 1.9.1 if the change is allowed by people and matz and yugui. -- NARUSE, Yui <naruse@airemix.jp>