[#12073] Re: Ruby is much slower on linux when compiled with --enable-pthread? — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 08:24:57PM +0900, Florian Frank wrote:
On 9/5/07, Sam Roberts <sroberts@uniserve.com> wrote:
[#12085] New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — David Flanagan <david@...>
Four new methods have been added to Array the Ruby 1.9 trunk. I've got
On 9/6/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:
Wilson Bilkovich wrote:
On 9/7/07, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> writes:
On 9/13/07, Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@gmail.com> wrote:
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
Restarting this thread because I missed it the first time around and
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 7:50 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Gregory Brown wrote:
Michael Neumann wrote:
Hi --
On 8/1/08, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
Wilson Bilkovich wrote:
Hi,
Hi --
2008/8/2 Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org>:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Florian Frank wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 9:37 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
On Jul 31, 2008, at 7:33 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
Jim Weirich wrote:
On Aug 1, 2008, at 1:53 PM, Thomas Enebo wrote:
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@gmail.com> wrote:
Gregory Brown wrote:
On Aug 1, 2008, at 2:40 PM, Thomas Enebo wrote:
[#12096] Next 1.8.6 on Sept. 22 — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
Hi all.
Well there is this patch:
Rocky Bernstein wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 9/10/07, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky <znmeb@cesmail.net> wrote:
On Sunday 09 September 2007, Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
[#12118] Is this expected behavior? — James Edward Gray II <james@...>
As part of TextMate's development process we have an application on a
[#12140] Strange ripper bug — "Alexey I. Froloff" <sir_raorn@...>
Sometimes, ripper can't parse valid code (trunk from yesterday).
On [Wed, 12.09.2007 03:05], Alexey I. Froloff wrote:
On [Thu, 13.09.2007 02:58], Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
Hi,
[#12143] Blocks passed to constructors - is this behavior by design? — "John Lam (CLR)" <jflam@...>
class Foo
It's because the constructor isn't actually finished executing, and the
[#12166] Wrapped loads and Module::nesting — David Flanagan <david@...>
When I call load with a second argument of true, the file is loaded into
[#12184] Misleading error message with URI::InvalidURIError — "Douglas Tan" <bianster@...>
The error message that URI.parse displays when supplied with a uri
[#12200] class variables and singleton classes — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
Class variables in singleton classes are separate from class
[#12201] how about actors implemented in ruby-core itself — hemant <gethemant@...>
Hi,
On 9/20/07, hemant <gethemant@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
[#12220] `ri Kernel#open` Bug — James Edward Gray II <james@...>
$ ri -T Kernel#open
On Sep 21, 2007, at 16:42, James Edward Gray II wrote:
On Sep 21, 2007, at 8:13 PM, Eric Hodel wrote:
On Sep 22, 2007, at 7:28 AM, Jim Freeze wrote:
[#12231] Wrong return value with []= — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>
Hi,
[#12237] Latest benchmarks — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...>
I just ran the benchmark suite that comes with Ruby 1.9 on my 32-bit
[#12247] Fibers as semi-coroutines enabled by default — David Flanagan <david@...>
Hi all,
Hi,
[#12248] arbitrary Unicode characters in identifiers? — David Flanagan <david@...>
[#12255] Array#-, &, |, uniq don't use == — murphy <murphy@...>
Hello!
[#12284] gc.c -- possible logic error? — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>
I've been looking at Tom Copeland's memory allocation problem:
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 21:57:22 +0900, Hugh Sasse <hgs@dmu.ac.uk> wrote:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2007, MenTaLguY wrote:
In article <Pine.GSO.4.64.0709281302390.26570@brains.eng.cse.dmu.ac.uk>,
On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, Tanaka Akira wrote:
In article <Pine.GSO.4.64.0710011802250.11425@brains.eng.cse.dmu.ac.uk>,
On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, Tanaka Akira wrote:
On Oct 1, 2007, at 10:54 , Hugh Sasse wrote:
On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#12294] String.force_encoding — David Flanagan <david@...>
Hi,
[#12305] Will 1.8.6 remain compiled with VC6? — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...>
Hello Core developers.
On 9/30/07, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/30/07, Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/30/07, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/30/07, Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:
I know this not the right place to post this, but I'll start here
Austin Ziegler wrote:
> Yes, let's take this to Ruby-Talk so we can all participate. Most of the
On 9/30/07, Charlie Savage <cfis@savagexi.com> wrote:
On 01/10/2007, Charlie Savage <cfis@savagexi.com> wrote:
On 10/3/07, Michal Suchanek <hramrach@centrum.cz> wrote:
Re: Will 1.8.6 remain compiled with VC6?
On 9/30/07, Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote: > On 9/30/07, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote: > > I remember the discussion was heated, but no final word on the > > platform that OCI will use for future releases. So far, still remains > > linked to VC6 ones. > > This isn't really a core Ruby question. This should be asked on > ruby-talk or (if there is one) the One Click Installer mailing list. > Austin, One-Click-Installer rely on official builds made by Ruby-Core developers (Nobu is in charge if memory works as expected). Is not a Ruby-Talk subject, but Ruby-Core one. > > What is required to finally migrate Ruby builds on Windows to VC8? > > A recompile of ANY library that an extension depends on, because of > rampant Microsoft incompatibilities. The problem is that any time you > have more than one application using more than one C run-time (e.g., > MSVCRT.DLL and MSCRT80.DLL), you have different memory allocation > tables, different file handle tables, etc. Microsoft simply DOES NOT > CARE about this and won't provide any workarounds to make this clean > and easy. > I'm aware of that problem, as I listed before just to summarize them. I'm not blaming anyone, Microsoft, users, whatever. We should look for a solution instead of starting to point fingers. > It is not in the One-Click Installer's mandate to recompile OpenSSL > using VC8 instead of VC6. Or zlib. Or pdcurses. Or ... > As I said, is not a OCI question, is for the official builds (on which OCI relies). > VC8 is the best compiler available right now and the only choice for > 64-bit Windows. Maybe we can talk to Intel about using the ICC if > they'll be compatible. But Microsoft never responded positively with > any way to work around this given that we don't control the library > chain end-to-end. > Maybe I'm wrong here, but 64-bit computing is useful for large memory-address (pointers) and not related to the core instructions set used to get a program working. There is x64-mingw also, even if not official yet. On a personal note I'm taking mingw as platform (x64-mingw is there, just not merged). > It's not a problem for most of Microsoft's customers like my > workplace, where we compile EVERYTHING we need from scratch (except, > of course, Windows) or can demand up-to-date libraries from our tool > vendors (or pay for them...). It is a problem for any open source > project, not just Ruby. > I was talking about "average Joe", who just started with Ruby and want to dig into the extension building / using land. Don't expect all the users that use a language compile everything from scratch. At some point you didn't... We should extend the "simple but not simpler" philosophy found across all Ruby and Ruby libraries to the environment. Getting it right reduce overhead of support, which turns in less noise and more happy developers/community. BTW, wasn't you who migrated to OSX? :-P -- Luis Lavena Multimedia systems - Leaders are made, they are not born. They are made by hard effort, which is the price which all of us must pay to achieve any goal that is worthwhile. Vince Lombardi