[#18121] [Ruby 1.8.7 - Bug #405] (Open) ssl.rb:31: [BUG] Bus Error — Anonymous <redmine@...>

Issue #405 has been reported by Anonymous.

14 messages 2008/08/04

[#18130] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>

> Seriously though... Array.first is a noun.

10 messages 2008/08/05

[#18319] NEW Command: absolute_path() -- — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>

Core,

14 messages 2008/08/16
[#18321] Re: NEW Command: absolute_path() -- — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/08/18

Hi,

[#18381] [Bug #496] DRb.start_service(nil) is very slow — Hongli Lai <redmine@...>

Bug #496: DRb.start_service(nil) is very slow

11 messages 2008/08/25

[ruby-core:18074] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle)

From: David Flanagan <david@...>
Date: 2008-08-01 21:43:56 UTC
List: ruby-core #18074
Wilson Bilkovich wrote:
> 
> I would like to cast my vote (not that I get a vote, but you get the
> idea) for Array#sample.
> Unlike 'choice', it actually sounds useful to me.
> 

I like 'sample' better than anything I've heard so far.  I only like it, 
however, if it accepts an optional argument for the size of the sample.
Picking one random element is so trivial it hardly requires a method. 
Picking n random elements without allowing duplicates and without 
duplicating and shuffling the entire array is not trivial and makes this 
a worthwhile addition to the Array API along with #shuffle.

If we agree that there is a use-case for adding #sample to the API, then
I would also argue again for #sample! which removes the sampled elements 
from the array.  There is no way to write #sample! based on #sample and 
I'd imagine that it would be usefule.

If the method doesn't take an argument and always returns a single 
element, then I'd prefer #rand or #random_element (or just removing the 
method) to #choose or #sample.

	David Flanagan





In This Thread