From: Francis Cianfrocca Date: 2007-09-21T08:55:51+09:00 Subject: Re: how about actors implemented in ruby-core itself ------=_Part_12215_19625246.1190332552030 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On 9/20/07, Wilson Bilkovich wrote: > > On 9/20/07, SASADA Koichi wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Wilson Bilkovich wrote: > > > Rubinius has Actor (implemented by MenTaLguY) as a core class. If ruby > > > 1.9.x wanted to add them as well, we would be more than happy to > > > conform to the API that was chosen. Right now we basically just have > > > Actor.spawn, Actor.receive, Actor#send, and Actor.current > > > > Can I read spec or examples of Actor? > > > > There aren't any particularly good ones yet, but I will write some this > week. > I'll reply with a link when they are up. > > The current version of EventMachine has an implementation of Erlang-like spawned processes. I'd be curious to know what you all think. There is a documentation file in the distro named SPAWNED_PROCESSES. ------=_Part_12215_19625246.1190332552030 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On 9/20/07, Wilson Bilkovich <wilsonb@gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/20/07, SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Wilson Bilkovich wrote:
> > Rubinius has Actor (implemented by MenTaLguY) as a core class. If ruby
> > 1.9.x wanted to add them as well, we would be more than happy to
> > conform to the API that was chosen. Right now we basically just have
> > Actor.spawn, Actor.receive, Actor#send, and Actor.current
>
> Can I read spec or examples of Actor?
>

There aren't any particularly good ones yet, but I will write some this week.
I'll reply with a link when they are up.



The current version of EventMachine has an implementation of Erlang-like spawned processes. I'd be curious to know what you all think. There is a documentation file in the distro named SPAWNED_PROCESSES.
------=_Part_12215_19625246.1190332552030--