[#12073] Re: Ruby is much slower on linux when compiled with --enable-pthread? — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
9 messages
2007/09/04
[#12076] Re: Ruby is much slower on linux when compiled with --enable-pthread?
— "Florian Frank" <flori@...>
2007/09/05
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
[#12079] Re: Ruby is much slower on linux when compiled with --enable-pthread?
— Sam Roberts <sroberts@...>
2007/09/05
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 08:24:57PM +0900, Florian Frank wrote:
[#12081] Re: Ruby is much slower on linux when compiled with --enable-pthread?
— "Alexey Verkhovsky" <alexey.verkhovsky@...>
2007/09/05
On 9/5/07, Sam Roberts <sroberts@uniserve.com> wrote:
[#12085] New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — David Flanagan <david@...>
Four new methods have been added to Array the Ruby 1.9 trunk. I've got
81 messages
2007/09/06
[#12089] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle)
— "Wilson Bilkovich" <wilsonb@...>
2007/09/07
On 9/6/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:
[#12091] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle)
— Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
2007/09/07
Wilson Bilkovich wrote:
[#12093] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle)
— "Wilson Bilkovich" <wilsonb@...>
2007/09/07
On 9/7/07, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#12165] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle)
— Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...>
2007/09/13
David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> writes:
[#12171] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle)
— "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...>
2007/09/14
On 9/13/07, Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@gmail.com> wrote:
[#12180] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle)
— David Flanagan <david@...>
2007/09/14
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
[#18036] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle)
— Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>
2008/07/31
Restarting this thread because I missed it the first time around and
[#18037] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle)
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/07/31
Hi,
[#18038] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle)
— "Gregory Brown" <gregory.t.brown@...>
2008/08/01
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 7:50 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#18046] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle)
— Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>
2008/08/01
Gregory Brown wrote:
[#18048] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle)
— Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>
2008/08/01
Michael Neumann wrote:
[#18051] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle)
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2008/08/01
Hi --
[#18053] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle)
— "Wilson Bilkovich" <wilsonb@...>
2008/08/01
On 8/1/08, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
[#18074] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle)
— David Flanagan <david@...>
2008/08/01
Wilson Bilkovich wrote:
[#18080] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle)
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/08/02
Hi,
[#18081] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle)
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2008/08/02
Hi --
[#18097] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle)
— "Pit Capitain" <pit.capitain@...>
2008/08/03
2008/8/2 Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org>:
[#18098] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle)
— Dave Thomas <dave@...>
2008/08/03
[#18101] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle)
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/08/03
Hi,
[#18102] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle)
— Dave Thomas <dave@...>
2008/08/03
[#18166] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle)
— "Florian Frank" <flori@...>
2008/08/07
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#18186] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle)
— Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>
2008/08/08
Florian Frank wrote:
[#18104] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle)
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/08/03
Hi,
[#18133] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle)
— "Martin DeMello" <martindemello@...>
2008/08/05
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 9:37 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#18040] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle)
— Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@...>
2008/08/01
On Jul 31, 2008, at 7:33 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#18056] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle)
— Thomas Enebo <Thomas.Enebo@...>
2008/08/01
Jim Weirich wrote:
[#18059] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle)
— Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@...>
2008/08/01
On Aug 1, 2008, at 1:53 PM, Thomas Enebo wrote:
[#18061] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle)
— "Gregory Brown" <gregory.t.brown@...>
2008/08/01
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@gmail.com> wrote:
[#18066] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle)
— Thomas Enebo <Thomas.Enebo@...>
2008/08/01
Gregory Brown wrote:
[#18070] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle)
— Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@...>
2008/08/01
On Aug 1, 2008, at 2:40 PM, Thomas Enebo wrote:
[#12096] Next 1.8.6 on Sept. 22 — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
Hi all.
28 messages
2007/09/09
[#12097] Re: Next 1.8.6 on Sept. 22
— "Rocky Bernstein" <rocky.bernstein@...>
2007/09/09
Well there is this patch:
[#12102] Re: Next 1.8.6 on Sept. 22
— Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
2007/09/09
Rocky Bernstein wrote:
[#12109] Re: Next 1.8.6 on Sept. 22
— "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...>
2007/09/10
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
[#12110] Re: Next 1.8.6 on Sept. 22
— "Wilson Bilkovich" <wilsonb@...>
2007/09/10
On 9/10/07, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky <znmeb@cesmail.net> wrote:
[#12099] Re: Next 1.8.6 on Sept. 22
— Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org>
2007/09/09
On Sunday 09 September 2007, Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
[#12118] Is this expected behavior? — James Edward Gray II <james@...>
As part of TextMate's development process we have an application on a
6 messages
2007/09/10
[#12140] Strange ripper bug — "Alexey I. Froloff" <sir_raorn@...>
Sometimes, ripper can't parse valid code (trunk from yesterday).
10 messages
2007/09/11
[#12154] Strange ripper bug
— "Kirill A. Shutemov" <k.shutemov@...>
2007/09/12
On [Wed, 12.09.2007 03:05], Alexey I. Froloff wrote:
[#12157] Re: [PATCH] Strange ripper bug
— "Kirill A. Shutemov" <k.shutemov@...>
2007/09/13
On [Thu, 13.09.2007 02:58], Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
[#12158] Re: [PATCH] Strange ripper bug
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2007/09/13
Hi,
[#12143] Blocks passed to constructors - is this behavior by design? — "John Lam (CLR)" <jflam@...>
class Foo
4 messages
2007/09/11
[#12144] Re: Blocks passed to constructors - is this behavior by design?
— "Marte Raphael Y. Soliza" <myrtactle@...>
2007/09/11
It's because the constructor isn't actually finished executing, and the
[#12166] Wrapped loads and Module::nesting — David Flanagan <david@...>
When I call load with a second argument of true, the file is loaded into
3 messages
2007/09/13
[#12184] Misleading error message with URI::InvalidURIError — "Douglas Tan" <bianster@...>
The error message that URI.parse displays when supplied with a uri
3 messages
2007/09/15
[#12200] class variables and singleton classes — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
Class variables in singleton classes are separate from class
7 messages
2007/09/20
[#12201] how about actors implemented in ruby-core itself — hemant <gethemant@...>
Hi,
12 messages
2007/09/20
[#12205] Re: how about actors implemented in ruby-core itself
— "Wilson Bilkovich" <wilsonb@...>
2007/09/20
On 9/20/07, hemant <gethemant@gmail.com> wrote:
[#12213] Re: how about actors implemented in ruby-core itself
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2007/09/20
Hi,
[#12220] `ri Kernel#open` Bug — James Edward Gray II <james@...>
$ ri -T Kernel#open
8 messages
2007/09/21
[#12221] Re: `ri Kernel#open` Bug
— Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
2007/09/22
On Sep 21, 2007, at 16:42, James Edward Gray II wrote:
[#12222] Re: `ri Kernel#open` Bug
— James Edward Gray II <james@...>
2007/09/22
On Sep 21, 2007, at 8:13 PM, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#12223] Re: `ri Kernel#open` Bug
— Jim Freeze <jim@...>
2007/09/22
[#12225] Can we move fri into the standard library? (was Re: `ri Kernel#open` Bug)
— James Edward Gray II <james@...>
2007/09/22
On Sep 22, 2007, at 7:28 AM, Jim Freeze wrote:
[#12231] Wrong return value with []= — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>
Hi,
4 messages
2007/09/23
[#12237] Latest benchmarks — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...>
I just ran the benchmark suite that comes with Ruby 1.9 on my 32-bit
5 messages
2007/09/24
[#12247] Fibers as semi-coroutines enabled by default — David Flanagan <david@...>
Hi all,
9 messages
2007/09/26
[#12265] Re: Fibers as semi-coroutines enabled by default
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2007/09/27
Hi,
[#12248] arbitrary Unicode characters in identifiers? — David Flanagan <david@...>
12 messages
2007/09/26
[#12255] Array#-, &, |, uniq don't use == — murphy <murphy@...>
Hello!
6 messages
2007/09/26
[#12284] gc.c -- possible logic error? — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>
I've been looking at Tom Copeland's memory allocation problem:
36 messages
2007/09/28
[#12286] Re: gc.c -- possible logic error?
— MenTaLguY <mental@...>
2007/09/28
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 21:57:22 +0900, Hugh Sasse <hgs@dmu.ac.uk> wrote:
[#12288] Re: gc.c -- possible logic error?
— Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>
2007/09/28
On Sat, 29 Sep 2007, MenTaLguY wrote:
[#12329] Re: gc.c -- possible logic error?
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2007/10/01
In article <Pine.GSO.4.64.0709281302390.26570@brains.eng.cse.dmu.ac.uk>,
[#12331] Re: gc.c -- possible logic error?
— Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>
2007/10/01
On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, Tanaka Akira wrote:
[#12332] Re: gc.c -- possible logic error?
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2007/10/01
In article <Pine.GSO.4.64.0710011802250.11425@brains.eng.cse.dmu.ac.uk>,
[#12334] Re: gc.c -- possible logic error?
— Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>
2007/10/01
On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, Tanaka Akira wrote:
[#12342] Re: gc.c -- possible logic error?
— Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
2007/10/01
On Oct 1, 2007, at 10:54 , Hugh Sasse wrote:
[#12357] Re: gc.c -- possible logic error?
— Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>
2007/10/02
On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#12294] String.force_encoding — David Flanagan <david@...>
Hi,
7 messages
2007/09/29
[#12305] Will 1.8.6 remain compiled with VC6? — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...>
Hello Core developers.
29 messages
2007/09/30
[#12306] Re: Will 1.8.6 remain compiled with VC6?
— "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...>
2007/09/30
On 9/30/07, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:
[#12307] Re: Will 1.8.6 remain compiled with VC6?
— "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...>
2007/09/30
On 9/30/07, Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:
[#12309] Re: Will 1.8.6 remain compiled with VC6?
— "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...>
2007/09/30
On 9/30/07, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:
[#12311] Re: Will 1.8.6 remain compiled with VC6?
— "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...>
2007/10/01
On 9/30/07, Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:
[#12359] Re: Will 1.8.6 remain compiled with VC6?
— "Curt (Work) Hibbs" <ml.chibbs@...>
2007/10/02
I know this not the right place to post this, but I'll start here
[#12308] Re: Will 1.8.6 remain compiled with VC6?
— "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...>
2007/09/30
Austin Ziegler wrote:
[#12315] Re: Will 1.8.6 remain compiled with VC6?
— Charlie Savage <cfis@...>
2007/10/01
> Yes, let's take this to Ruby-Talk so we can all participate. Most of the
[#12316] Re: Will 1.8.6 remain compiled with VC6?
— "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...>
2007/10/01
On 9/30/07, Charlie Savage <cfis@savagexi.com> wrote:
[#12318] Re: Will 1.8.6 remain compiled with VC6?
— Charlie Savage <cfis@...>
2007/10/01
[#12380] Re: Will 1.8.6 remain compiled with VC6?
— "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...>
2007/10/03
On 01/10/2007, Charlie Savage <cfis@savagexi.com> wrote:
[#12387] Re: Will 1.8.6 remain compiled with VC6?
— "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...>
2007/10/03
On 10/3/07, Michal Suchanek <hramrach@centrum.cz> wrote:
[PATCH] Improving XML-RPC ModRuby support
From:
Chris Wailes <cwailes2@...>
Date:
2007-09-14 16:34:59 UTC
List:
ruby-core #12173
Attached are two patches. The first one changes the way that ModRuby is supported. Instead of loading the server and responding to a request every time a request is made a persistent object is generated that can be used by ModRuby as a RubyHandler. This should improve performance. The second patch changes the XMLRPC::Server::dispatch method so that it passes the 'methodname' to the service_hook object. This should allow more functionality inside the service hook, such as conditional logging or access control to functions. Chris Wailes P.S. This is my third attempt to submit this patch with no comments... hopefully it will get noticed this time.
Attachments (2)
xmlrpc-modruby.patch
(3.52 KB, text/x-diff)
Index: lib/xmlrpc/server.rb
===================================================================
--- lib/xmlrpc/server.rb (revision 13445)
+++ lib/xmlrpc/server.rb (working copy)
@@ -498,44 +498,91 @@
=begin
= XMLRPC::ModRubyServer
-== Description
-Implements a XML-RPC server, which works with Apache mod_ruby.
+== Synopsis
+ruby_file.rb:
+ def make_server
+ server = XMLRPC::ModRubyServer.new()
-Use it in the same way as CGIServer!
+ server.add_handler("michael.add") do |a,b|
+ a + b
+ end
+ server.add_handler("michael.div") do |a,b|
+ if b == 0
+ raise XMLRPC::FaultException.new(1, "division by zero")
+ else
+ a / b
+ end
+ end
+
+ server.set_default_handler do |name, *args|
+ raise XMLRPC::FaultException.new(-99, "Method #{name} missing" + " or wrong number of parameters!")
+ end
+
+ return server
+ end
+
+ruby.conf:
+#This is your mod_ruby configuration file.
+ LoadModule ruby_module modules/mod_ruby.so
+
+ DirectoryIndex index.rb
+
+ AddType text/html.rb
+ <IfModule mod_ruby.c>
+ RubyRequire apache/ruby-run
+
+ #If your file is at /path/to/your/ruby_file.rb
+ RubyAddPath /path/to/your
+ RubyRequire ruby_file
+
+ # Exec *.rb as ruby scripts.
+ <Files *.rb>
+ SetHandler ruby-object
+ RubyHandler Apache::RubyRun.instance
+ Options +ExecCGI
+ </Files>
+ </IfModule>
+
+ #This location doesn't actually corispond to any file so you can make it any path you want.
+ #This example makes the server address http://example.com/xmlrpcserver
+ <Location /xmlrpcserver>
+ SetHandler ruby-object
+ RubyHandler make_server
+
+ Order allow,deny
+ Allow from all
+ </Location>
+
+== Description
+Implements a XML-RPC server, which works with Apache mod_ruby. By providing the 'handler' method a ModRubyServer object
+can be used as a RubyHandler by mod_ruby. This prevents the server from being instantiated every time a request is made.
== Superclass
((<XMLRPC::BasicServer>))
-=end
+=end
class ModRubyServer < BasicServer
+ def handler(apache_request)
+ @ap = apache_request
- def initialize(*a)
- @ap = Apache::request
- super(*a)
- end
+ header = Hash.new
+ @ap.headers_in.each {|key, value| header[key.capitalize] = value}
- def serve
- catch(:exit_serve) {
- header = {}
- @ap.headers_in.each {|key, value| header[key.capitalize] = value}
+ length = header['Content-length'].to_i
- length = header['Content-length'].to_i
+ http_error(405, "Method Not Allowed") unless @ap.request_method == "POST"
+ http_error(400, "Bad Request") unless parse_content_type(header['Content-type']).first == "text/xml"
+ http_error(411, "Length Required") unless length > 0
- http_error(405, "Method Not Allowed") unless @ap.request_method == "POST"
- http_error(400, "Bad Request") unless parse_content_type(header['Content-type']).first == "text/xml"
- http_error(411, "Length Required") unless length > 0
+ @ap.binmode
+ data = apache_request.read(length)
- # TODO: do we need a call to binmode?
- @ap.binmode
- data = @ap.read(length)
+ http_error(400, "Bad Requiest") if data.nil? or data.size != length
- http_error(400, "Bad Request") if data.nil? or data.size != length
+ http_write(process(data), 200, "Content-type" => "text/xml; charset=utf-8")
- http_write(process(data), 200, "Content-type" => "text/xml; charset=utf-8")
- }
+ return Apache::OK
end
-
-
private
def http_error(status, message)
xmlrpc-dispatch.patch
(932 Bytes, text/x-diff)
Index: lib/xmlrpc/server.rb
===================================================================
--- lib/xmlrpc/server.rb (revision 13445)
+++ lib/xmlrpc/server.rb (working copy)
@@ -129,9 +129,9 @@
The service-hook is called with a (({Proc})) object and with the parameters for this (({Proc})).
An example:
- server.set_service_hook {|obj, *args|
+ server.set_service_hook {|methodname, method_obj, *args|
begin
- ret = obj.call(*args) # call the original service-method
+ ret = method_obj.call(*args) # call the original service-method
# could convert the return value
resuce
# rescue exceptions
@@ -333,7 +333,7 @@
if @service_hook.nil?
return obj.call(*args)
else
- return @service_hook.call(obj, *args)
+ return @service_hook.call(methodname, obj, *args)
end
end
end