[#12073] Re: Ruby is much slower on linux when compiled with --enable-pthread? — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 08:24:57PM +0900, Florian Frank wrote:
On 9/5/07, Sam Roberts <sroberts@uniserve.com> wrote:
[#12085] New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — David Flanagan <david@...>
Four new methods have been added to Array the Ruby 1.9 trunk. I've got
On 9/6/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:
Wilson Bilkovich wrote:
On 9/7/07, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> writes:
On 9/13/07, Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@gmail.com> wrote:
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
Restarting this thread because I missed it the first time around and
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 7:50 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Gregory Brown wrote:
Michael Neumann wrote:
Hi --
On 8/1/08, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
Wilson Bilkovich wrote:
Hi,
Hi --
2008/8/2 Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org>:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Florian Frank wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 9:37 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
On Jul 31, 2008, at 7:33 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
Jim Weirich wrote:
On Aug 1, 2008, at 1:53 PM, Thomas Enebo wrote:
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@gmail.com> wrote:
Gregory Brown wrote:
On Aug 1, 2008, at 2:40 PM, Thomas Enebo wrote:
[#12096] Next 1.8.6 on Sept. 22 — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
Hi all.
Well there is this patch:
Rocky Bernstein wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 9/10/07, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky <znmeb@cesmail.net> wrote:
On Sunday 09 September 2007, Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
[#12118] Is this expected behavior? — James Edward Gray II <james@...>
As part of TextMate's development process we have an application on a
[#12140] Strange ripper bug — "Alexey I. Froloff" <sir_raorn@...>
Sometimes, ripper can't parse valid code (trunk from yesterday).
On [Wed, 12.09.2007 03:05], Alexey I. Froloff wrote:
On [Thu, 13.09.2007 02:58], Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
Hi,
[#12143] Blocks passed to constructors - is this behavior by design? — "John Lam (CLR)" <jflam@...>
class Foo
It's because the constructor isn't actually finished executing, and the
[#12166] Wrapped loads and Module::nesting — David Flanagan <david@...>
When I call load with a second argument of true, the file is loaded into
[#12184] Misleading error message with URI::InvalidURIError — "Douglas Tan" <bianster@...>
The error message that URI.parse displays when supplied with a uri
[#12200] class variables and singleton classes — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
Class variables in singleton classes are separate from class
[#12201] how about actors implemented in ruby-core itself — hemant <gethemant@...>
Hi,
On 9/20/07, hemant <gethemant@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
[#12220] `ri Kernel#open` Bug — James Edward Gray II <james@...>
$ ri -T Kernel#open
On Sep 21, 2007, at 16:42, James Edward Gray II wrote:
On Sep 21, 2007, at 8:13 PM, Eric Hodel wrote:
On Sep 22, 2007, at 7:28 AM, Jim Freeze wrote:
[#12231] Wrong return value with []= — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>
Hi,
[#12237] Latest benchmarks — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...>
I just ran the benchmark suite that comes with Ruby 1.9 on my 32-bit
[#12247] Fibers as semi-coroutines enabled by default — David Flanagan <david@...>
Hi all,
Hi,
[#12248] arbitrary Unicode characters in identifiers? — David Flanagan <david@...>
[#12255] Array#-, &, |, uniq don't use == — murphy <murphy@...>
Hello!
[#12284] gc.c -- possible logic error? — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>
I've been looking at Tom Copeland's memory allocation problem:
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 21:57:22 +0900, Hugh Sasse <hgs@dmu.ac.uk> wrote:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2007, MenTaLguY wrote:
In article <Pine.GSO.4.64.0709281302390.26570@brains.eng.cse.dmu.ac.uk>,
On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, Tanaka Akira wrote:
In article <Pine.GSO.4.64.0710011802250.11425@brains.eng.cse.dmu.ac.uk>,
On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, Tanaka Akira wrote:
On Oct 1, 2007, at 10:54 , Hugh Sasse wrote:
On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#12294] String.force_encoding — David Flanagan <david@...>
Hi,
[#12305] Will 1.8.6 remain compiled with VC6? — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...>
Hello Core developers.
On 9/30/07, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/30/07, Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/30/07, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/30/07, Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:
I know this not the right place to post this, but I'll start here
Austin Ziegler wrote:
> Yes, let's take this to Ruby-Talk so we can all participate. Most of the
On 9/30/07, Charlie Savage <cfis@savagexi.com> wrote:
On 01/10/2007, Charlie Savage <cfis@savagexi.com> wrote:
On 10/3/07, Michal Suchanek <hramrach@centrum.cz> wrote:
Re: Fibers as semi-coroutines enabled by default
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 04:20:29 +0900, SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote: >> It could be a good idea, as long as you're careful to keep things >> simple and follow an established formalism. I'd personally >> recommend the asynchronous pi calculus, which is very simple and >> is used in Rubinius core for concurrency. > > I think Fiber/Coroutine should be synchronous. After all, it's > overkill for simple feature. This is important that we can make > scheduler, mailbox, asynchronous model framework, etc on user-level > (ruby-level). Rich features such as mailbox should be implemented > outside Fiber. Channels can be asynchronous even if the implementation of "process" (fiber) is synchronous. But a channel implies some kind of scheduling by definition. If you don't want scheduling at the fiber, level, then channels probably don't belong at the fiber level (Rubinius has them at the thread level). -mental