From: eregontp@... Date: 2020-07-28T18:30:55+00:00 Subject: [ruby-core:99368] [Ruby master Bug#12671] Hash#to_proc result is not a lambda, but enforces arity Issue #12671 has been updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze). Looking at the commit, should Hash#to_proc use `rb_func_lambda_new()` instead of `rb_func_proc_new()`? (and then `rb_func_proc_new` is unused) Also it seems confusing that `rb_func_proc_new()` creates a lambda, so using `rb_func_lambda_new()` seems better here. ---------------------------------------- Bug #12671: Hash#to_proc result is not a lambda, but enforces arity https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12671#change-86771 * Author: headius (Charles Nutter) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * ruby -v: ruby 2.3.0p0 (2015-12-25 revision 53290) [x86_64-darwin14] * Backport: 2.1: UNKNOWN, 2.2: UNKNOWN, 2.3: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- ``` $ ruby23 -e 'pr = {foo:1}.to_proc; puts pr.lambda?; pr.call rescue puts $!; pr.call(1, 2) rescue puts $!' false wrong number of arguments (given 0, expected 1) wrong number of arguments (given 2, expected 1) ``` I believe it should be marked as a lambda, since it enforces arity. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: