[#99002] [Ruby master Feature#17004] Provide a way for methods to omit their return value — shyouhei@...

Issue #17004 has been reported by shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe).

21 messages 2020/07/01

[#99044] [Ruby master Bug#17007] SystemStackError when using super inside Module included and lexically inside refinement — eregontp@...

Issue #17007 has been reported by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).

7 messages 2020/07/03

[#99078] [Ruby master Feature#17016] Enumerable#scan_left — finch.parker@...

Issue #17016 has been reported by parker (Parker Finch).

42 messages 2020/07/07

[#99079] [Ruby master Bug#17017] Range#max & Range#minmax incorrectly use Float end as max — bosticko@...

Issue #17017 has been reported by sambostock (Sam Bostock).

25 messages 2020/07/07

[#99097] [Ruby master Bug#17021] "arm64" and "arm" are mixed in RbConfig on Apple silicon — watson1978@...

Issue #17021 has been reported by watson1978 (Shizuo Fujita).

9 messages 2020/07/09

[#99115] [Ruby master Bug#17023] How to prevent String memory to be relocated in ruby-ffi — larskanis@...

Issue #17023 has been reported by larskanis (Lars Kanis).

22 messages 2020/07/10

[#99156] [Ruby master Bug#17030] Enumerable#grep{_v} should be optimized for Regexp — marcandre-ruby-core@...

Issue #17030 has been reported by marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune).

25 messages 2020/07/13

[#99257] [Ruby master Misc#17041] DevelopersMeeting20200826Japan — mame@...

Issue #17041 has been reported by mame (Yusuke Endoh).

18 messages 2020/07/22

[#99308] [Ruby master Feature#17047] Support parameters for MAIL FROM and RCPT TO — bugs.ruby-lang.org@...

Issue #17047 has been reported by c960657 (Christian Schmidt).

11 messages 2020/07/23

[#99311] [Ruby master Bug#17048] Calling initialize_copy on live modules leads to crashes — XrXr@...

Issue #17048 has been reported by alanwu (Alan Wu).

17 messages 2020/07/24

[#99351] [Ruby master Bug#17052] Ruby with LTO enabled on {aarch64, ppc64le} architectures. — v.ondruch@...

Issue #17052 has been reported by vo.x (Vit Ondruch).

35 messages 2020/07/27

[#99375] [Ruby master Feature#17055] Allow suppressing uninitialized instance variable and method redefined verbose mode warnings — merch-redmine@...

Issue #17055 has been reported by jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans).

29 messages 2020/07/28

[#99391] [Ruby master Feature#17059] epoll as IO.select — dsh0416@...

Issue #17059 has been reported by dsh0416 (Delton Ding).

18 messages 2020/07/29

[#99418] [Ruby master Feature#17097] `map_min`, `map_max` — sawadatsuyoshi@...

Issue #17097 has been reported by sawa (Tsuyoshi Sawada).

11 messages 2020/07/31

[ruby-core:99268] [Ruby master Bug#14804] GzipReader cannot read Freebase dump (but gzcat/zless can)

From: merch-redmine@...
Date: 2020-07-22 15:40:32 UTC
List: ruby-core #99268
Issue #14804 has been updated by jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans).

Status changed from Open to Closed

This can now be handled using `Zlib::GzipReader.zcat`, which was recently added to zlib.

----------------------------------------
Bug #14804: GzipReader cannot read Freebase dump (but gzcat/zless can)
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14804#change-86655

* Author: amadan (Goran Topic)
* Status: Closed
* Priority: Normal
* ruby -v: Ruby 2.4.1p111 (2017-03-22 revision 58053) [x86_64-darwin17]
* Backport: 2.3: UNKNOWN, 2.4: UNKNOWN, 2.5: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
This is likely related to https://stackoverflow.com/questions/35354951/gzipstream-quietly-fails-on-large-file-stream-ends-at-2gb (and its accepted answer).

The file in question: http://commondatastorage.googleapis.com/freebase-public/rdf/freebase-rdf-latest.gz
(watch out, it's 30Gb compressed!)

Steps to reproduce:

    require "zlib"
    Zlib::GzipReader.open("freebase-rdf-latest.gz") { |f| f.each_line.count }
    # => 14374340

However, the correct answer is different:

    $ gzcat freebase-rdf-latest.gz | wc -l
    3130753066

Another experiment showed that the last `f.tell` was `1945715682`, while there's considerably more bytes in the uncompressed version. This fits well with the Stack Overflow report from C# linked above, which states the first "substream" contains exactly that many bytes.

If this is a hard constraint from the wrapped library (and thus should be fixed upstream), at least the documentation should mention it.



-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>

In This Thread

Prev Next