[#99426] [Ruby master Bug#17098] Float#negative? reports negative zero as not negative — chris@...

Issue #17098 has been reported by chrisseaton (Chris Seaton).

12 messages 2020/08/01

[#99449] [Ruby master Bug#17100] Ractor: a proposal for new concurrent abstraction without thread-safety issues — ko1@...

Issue #17100 has been reported by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).

41 messages 2020/08/03

[#99474] [Ruby master Feature#17103] Add a :since option to ObjectSpace.dump_all — jean.boussier@...

Issue #17103 has been reported by byroot (Jean Boussier).

9 messages 2020/08/04

[#99485] [Ruby master Misc#17104] Why are interpolated string literals frozen? — bughitgithub@...

Issue #17104 has been reported by bughit (bug hit).

23 messages 2020/08/05

[#99499] [Ruby master Bug#17105] A single `return` can return to two different places in a proc inside a lambda inside a method — eregontp@...

Issue #17105 has been reported by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).

10 messages 2020/08/06

[#99582] [Ruby master Feature#17122] Add category to Warning#warn — eileencodes@...

Issue #17122 has been reported by eileencodes (Eileen Uchitelle).

20 messages 2020/08/13

[#99700] [Ruby master Bug#17129] bundle install `eventmachine` and `sassc` fails since 914b2208ab3eddec478cdc3e079e6c30d0f0892c — yasuo.honda@...

Issue #17129 has been reported by yahonda (Yasuo Honda).

9 messages 2020/08/26

[ruby-core:99716] [Ruby master Bug#17030] Enumerable#grep{_v} should be optimized for Regexp

From: daniel@...42.com
Date: 2020-08-26 20:43:44 UTC
List: ruby-core #99716
Issue #17030 has been updated by Dan0042 (Daniel DeLorme).


What about this?

```ruby
2.times do
  p $~  # depends on match *below*
  rx =~ str
end
```

Now imagine if `2.times` is replaced by `foo`; a priori we can't know if or how many times the block will be executed. So what I was trying to say is that flow control can lead to all kinds of code paths where it's extremely difficult to know which matching operations a pseudo-global may depend on. Maybe not impossible, but personally I wouldn't want to code that kind of analysis when a simple approach is enough for >90% of cases, and guaranteed to be bug-free.


> There will be other false positives: `str.gsub(regexp, &block)`. That's not a real issue, simply assume that `block` will want access to `Regexp.last_match`.

Actually... `block` does not have access to `Regexp.last_match` (unless you created the block in the same scope as the gsub operation, but that would be unusual)

----------------------------------------
Bug #17030: Enumerable#grep{_v} should be optimized for Regexp
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/17030#change-87206

* Author: marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Backport: 2.5: UNKNOWN, 2.6: UNKNOWN, 2.7: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
Currently:

```ruby
array.select { |e| e.match?(REGEXP) }

# about 3x faster and 6x more memory efficient than
array.grep(REGEXP)
```

This is because `grep` calls `Regexp#===` which creates useless `MatchData`



-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>

In This Thread