[#99115] [Ruby master Bug#17023] How to prevent String memory to be relocated in ruby-ffi — larskanis@...
Issue #17023 has been reported by larskanis (Lars Kanis).
22 messages
2020/07/10
[#99375] [Ruby master Feature#17055] Allow suppressing uninitialized instance variable and method redefined verbose mode warnings — merch-redmine@...
Issue #17055 has been reported by jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans).
29 messages
2020/07/28
[#101207] [Ruby master Feature#17055] Allow suppressing uninitialized instance variable and method redefined verbose mode warnings
— merch-redmine@...
2020/12/02
Issue #17055 has been updated by jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans).
[#101231] Re: [Ruby master Feature#17055] Allow suppressing uninitialized instance variable and method redefined verbose mode warnings
— Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...>
2020/12/03
What does this mean?
[ruby-core:99209] [Ruby master Bug#17031] `Kernel#caller_locations(m, n)` should be optimized
From:
merch-redmine@...
Date:
2020-07-17 23:09:20 UTC
List:
ruby-core #99209
Issue #17031 has been updated by jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans).
Reviewing the related code in vm_backtrace.c, you are correct. This occurs both for `caller` and `caller_locations`. The entire internal backtrace object is generated by `rb_ec_backtrace_object`, and then passed to a function that looks at specific parts of it to generate the strings or Thread::Backtrace::Location objects. To fix this would require changing the logic so that `rb_ec_backtrace_object` was passed the starting level and number of frames.
----------------------------------------
Bug #17031: `Kernel#caller_locations(m, n)` should be optimized
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/17031#change-86589
* Author: marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Backport: 2.5: UNKNOWN, 2.6: UNKNOWN, 2.7: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
`Kernel#caller_locations(1, 1)` currently appears to needlessly allocate memory for the whole backtrace.
It allocates ~20kB for a 800-deep stacktrace, vs 1.6 kB for a shallow backtrace.
It is also much slower for long stacktraces: about 7x slower for a 800-deep backtrace than for a shallow one.
Test used:
```ruby
def do_something
location = caller_locations(1, 1).first
end
def test(depth, trigger)
do_something if depth == trigger
test(depth - 1, trigger) unless depth == 0
end
require 'benchmark/ips'
Benchmark.ips do |x|
x.report (:short_backtrace ) {test(800,800)}
x.report (:long_backtrace ) {test(800, 0)}
x.report (:no_caller_locations) {test(800, -1)}
end
require 'memory_profiler'
MemoryProfiler.report { test(800,800) }.pretty_print(scale_bytes: true, detailed_report: false)
MemoryProfiler.report { test(800, 0) }.pretty_print(scale_bytes: true, detailed_report: false)
```
Found when checking memory usage on RuboCop.
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>