[#64703] Add `Hash#fetch_at` (issue #10017) — Wojtek Mach <wojtek@...>
Hey guys
1 message
2014/09/01
[#64711] [ruby-trunk - Bug #10193] [Closed] TestIO#test_readpartial_locktmp fails randomly — nobu@...
Issue #10193 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
3 messages
2014/09/02
[#64744] [ruby-trunk - Bug #10202] [Open] TestBenchmark#test_realtime_output breaks on ARM — v.ondruch@...
Issue #10202 has been reported by Vit Ondruch.
3 messages
2014/09/03
[#64823] documenting constants — Xavier Noria <fxn@...>
I am writing a Rails guide about constant autoloading in Ruby on
5 messages
2014/09/07
[#64838] [ruby-trunk - Bug #10212] [Open] MRI is not for lambda calculus — ko1@...
Issue #10212 has been reported by Koichi Sasada.
6 messages
2014/09/08
[#64858] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #10212] [Open] MRI is not for lambda calculus
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/09/08
rb_env_t may use a flexible array, helps a little even on my busy system:
[#64871] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #10212] [Open] MRI is not for lambda calculus
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/09/08
(2014/09/08 19:48), Eric Wong wrote:
[#64972] [ruby-trunk - Bug #10231] [Open] Process.detach(pid) defines new singleton classes every call — headius@...
Issue #10231 has been reported by Charles Nutter.
3 messages
2014/09/11
[#64980] [ruby-trunk - Bug #10212] MRI is not for lambda calculus — ko1@...
Issue #10212 has been updated by Koichi Sasada.
4 messages
2014/09/12
[#65142] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10267] [Open] Number of processors — akr@...
Issue #10267 has been reported by Akira Tanaka.
4 messages
2014/09/20
[#65144] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #10267] [Open] Number of processors
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/09/20
akr@fsij.org wrote:
[#65210] [ruby-trunk - misc #10278] [Assigned] [RFC] st.c: use ccan linked list — nobu@...
Issue #10278 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
3 messages
2014/09/22
[ruby-core:65328] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10274] [PATCH 0/2] more rb_iseq_t reductions (and more planned)
From:
normalperson@...
Date:
2014-09-30 09:20:56 UTC
List:
ruby-core #65328
Issue #10274 has been updated by Eric Wong.
I reject 0002, but I don't think 0001 hurts readability.
I will update arg_simple to 0..3 from nobu's comment.
----------------------------------------
Feature #10274: [PATCH 0/2] more rb_iseq_t reductions (and more planned)
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10274#change-49143
* Author: Eric Wong
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: Koichi Sasada
* Category: core
* Target version: current: 2.2.0
----------------------------------------
Both of these are pretty simple, low impact patches:
We are close to being able to fit rb_iseq_t in four 64 byte
cache line (we are 262 bytes after these patches,
a milestone is <= 256 bytes).
* [PATCH 1/2] iseq: reduce from 280 to 272 bytes
- arg_simple is limited to 3 possible values: 0, 1, and 2
- arg_keyword_check is a boolean
- flip_cnt should be int to enforce portable code between 64-bit and
32-bit systems and must fit in FIXNUM space.
I doubt anybody would notice if flip_cnt (or any arg counters)
were 8 bits, even.
* [PATCH 2/2] iseq: remove iseq->iseq field (270 => 262 bytes on 64-bit)
We may store the original iseq after the encoded iseq to reduce
allocation overhead and use a boolean to denote whether or not
the iseq_encoded field contains data at the end.
This simplifies iseq_free and iseq_memsize a little, too.
I will commit in a week or so unless there are objections.
Future:
Move some keyword-related fields into its own struct (similar to
catch table). Maybe compile_data can be split off.
---Files--------------------------------
0001-iseq-reduce-from-280-to-272-bytes.patch (2.35 KB)
0002-iseq-remove-iseq-iseq-field-270-262-bytes-on-64-bit.patch (3.32 KB)
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/