[#64703] Add `Hash#fetch_at` (issue #10017) — Wojtek Mach <wojtek@...>
Hey guys
1 message
2014/09/01
[#64711] [ruby-trunk - Bug #10193] [Closed] TestIO#test_readpartial_locktmp fails randomly — nobu@...
Issue #10193 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
3 messages
2014/09/02
[#64744] [ruby-trunk - Bug #10202] [Open] TestBenchmark#test_realtime_output breaks on ARM — v.ondruch@...
Issue #10202 has been reported by Vit Ondruch.
3 messages
2014/09/03
[#64823] documenting constants — Xavier Noria <fxn@...>
I am writing a Rails guide about constant autoloading in Ruby on
5 messages
2014/09/07
[#64838] [ruby-trunk - Bug #10212] [Open] MRI is not for lambda calculus — ko1@...
Issue #10212 has been reported by Koichi Sasada.
6 messages
2014/09/08
[#64858] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #10212] [Open] MRI is not for lambda calculus
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/09/08
rb_env_t may use a flexible array, helps a little even on my busy system:
[#64871] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #10212] [Open] MRI is not for lambda calculus
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/09/08
(2014/09/08 19:48), Eric Wong wrote:
[#64972] [ruby-trunk - Bug #10231] [Open] Process.detach(pid) defines new singleton classes every call — headius@...
Issue #10231 has been reported by Charles Nutter.
3 messages
2014/09/11
[#64980] [ruby-trunk - Bug #10212] MRI is not for lambda calculus — ko1@...
Issue #10212 has been updated by Koichi Sasada.
4 messages
2014/09/12
[#65142] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10267] [Open] Number of processors — akr@...
Issue #10267 has been reported by Akira Tanaka.
4 messages
2014/09/20
[#65144] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #10267] [Open] Number of processors
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/09/20
akr@fsij.org wrote:
[#65210] [ruby-trunk - misc #10278] [Assigned] [RFC] st.c: use ccan linked list — nobu@...
Issue #10278 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
3 messages
2014/09/22
[ruby-core:65075] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #10225] [PATCH] *math.c: New method Math.normcdf
From:
David MacMahon <davidm@...>
Date:
2014-09-17 04:43:01 UTC
List:
ruby-core #65075
On Sep 16, 2014, at 4:14 PM, mail@tanakakazuki.com wrote: > Actually I know that gem(how nice it is!), I'm disconsolate about a few people knowing that gem. The gsl gem has its issues (memory management and it can be kind of clunky to use sometimes), but it really does provide a great deal of numerical functionality. > Even if Ruby/GSL is as strong as python's one, most of people(include me) don't use it. > > As for numerical analysis, stability, accuracy or reliability are most important things. Is the GSL itself somehow deficient for your needs? It is also an open source project, so I'm (almost) sure patches would be welcome. Ruby/GSL is also open source, though admittedly under-maintained. :-( > In this respect, I believe that to provide such a feature "as official" is helpful. I agree that having numerical capabilities better supported would be a great thing, but I'm not sure that the Math module is the best place to do so. There are so many things that could be added! Where would it end? :-) Dave