[#64703] Add `Hash#fetch_at` (issue #10017) — Wojtek Mach <wojtek@...>
Hey guys
1 message
2014/09/01
[#64711] [ruby-trunk - Bug #10193] [Closed] TestIO#test_readpartial_locktmp fails randomly — nobu@...
Issue #10193 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
3 messages
2014/09/02
[#64744] [ruby-trunk - Bug #10202] [Open] TestBenchmark#test_realtime_output breaks on ARM — v.ondruch@...
Issue #10202 has been reported by Vit Ondruch.
3 messages
2014/09/03
[#64823] documenting constants — Xavier Noria <fxn@...>
I am writing a Rails guide about constant autoloading in Ruby on
5 messages
2014/09/07
[#64838] [ruby-trunk - Bug #10212] [Open] MRI is not for lambda calculus — ko1@...
Issue #10212 has been reported by Koichi Sasada.
6 messages
2014/09/08
[#64858] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #10212] [Open] MRI is not for lambda calculus
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/09/08
rb_env_t may use a flexible array, helps a little even on my busy system:
[#64871] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #10212] [Open] MRI is not for lambda calculus
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/09/08
(2014/09/08 19:48), Eric Wong wrote:
[#64972] [ruby-trunk - Bug #10231] [Open] Process.detach(pid) defines new singleton classes every call — headius@...
Issue #10231 has been reported by Charles Nutter.
3 messages
2014/09/11
[#64980] [ruby-trunk - Bug #10212] MRI is not for lambda calculus — ko1@...
Issue #10212 has been updated by Koichi Sasada.
4 messages
2014/09/12
[#65142] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10267] [Open] Number of processors — akr@...
Issue #10267 has been reported by Akira Tanaka.
4 messages
2014/09/20
[#65144] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #10267] [Open] Number of processors
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/09/20
akr@fsij.org wrote:
[#65210] [ruby-trunk - misc #10278] [Assigned] [RFC] st.c: use ccan linked list — nobu@...
Issue #10278 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
3 messages
2014/09/22
[ruby-core:65280] [ruby-trunk - Bug #10294] Dir[] cannot be called with an array argument
From:
jacknagel@...
Date:
2014-09-26 06:28:06 UTC
List:
ruby-core #65280
Issue #10294 has been updated by Jack Nagel. I'm aware of what actually works in practice, but the documentation claims both forms are acceptable: ``` Dir[ array ] → array Dir[ string [, string ...] ] → array ``` https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/2a8989d71c611884631c4d9ff5dba65aed00cc83/dir.c#L1871-L1877 ---------------------------------------- Bug #10294: Dir[] cannot be called with an array argument https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10294#change-49103 * Author: Jack Nagel * Status: Rejected * Priority: Normal * Assignee: * Category: * Target version: * ruby -v: ruby 2.2.0dev (2014-09-20 trunk 47651) [x86_64-darwin13] * Backport: 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- The documentation for `Dir[]` claims that it can be called with an array and it will behave like Dir.glob: ``` Dir[ array ] → array Dir[ string [, string ...] ] → array Equivalent to calling Dir.glob(array,0) and Dir.glob([string,...],0). ``` However, doing so raises a TypeError: ``` $ ruby -e "puts Dir[['/bin/bash']]" -e:1:in `[]': no implicit conversion of Array into String (TypeError) from -e:1:in `<main>' ``` Dir.glob works as documented: ``` $ ruby -e "puts Dir.glob ['/bin/bash']" /bin/bash ``` I'm unsure if this is supposed to work as described or if it is a documentation bug, but it is reproducible on 2.0, 2.1, and trunk. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/