[#64703] Add `Hash#fetch_at` (issue #10017) — Wojtek Mach <wojtek@...>
Hey guys
1 message
2014/09/01
[#64711] [ruby-trunk - Bug #10193] [Closed] TestIO#test_readpartial_locktmp fails randomly — nobu@...
Issue #10193 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
3 messages
2014/09/02
[#64744] [ruby-trunk - Bug #10202] [Open] TestBenchmark#test_realtime_output breaks on ARM — v.ondruch@...
Issue #10202 has been reported by Vit Ondruch.
3 messages
2014/09/03
[#64823] documenting constants — Xavier Noria <fxn@...>
I am writing a Rails guide about constant autoloading in Ruby on
5 messages
2014/09/07
[#64838] [ruby-trunk - Bug #10212] [Open] MRI is not for lambda calculus — ko1@...
Issue #10212 has been reported by Koichi Sasada.
6 messages
2014/09/08
[#64858] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #10212] [Open] MRI is not for lambda calculus
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/09/08
rb_env_t may use a flexible array, helps a little even on my busy system:
[#64871] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #10212] [Open] MRI is not for lambda calculus
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/09/08
(2014/09/08 19:48), Eric Wong wrote:
[#64972] [ruby-trunk - Bug #10231] [Open] Process.detach(pid) defines new singleton classes every call — headius@...
Issue #10231 has been reported by Charles Nutter.
3 messages
2014/09/11
[#64980] [ruby-trunk - Bug #10212] MRI is not for lambda calculus — ko1@...
Issue #10212 has been updated by Koichi Sasada.
4 messages
2014/09/12
[#65142] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10267] [Open] Number of processors — akr@...
Issue #10267 has been reported by Akira Tanaka.
4 messages
2014/09/20
[#65144] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #10267] [Open] Number of processors
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/09/20
akr@fsij.org wrote:
[#65210] [ruby-trunk - misc #10278] [Assigned] [RFC] st.c: use ccan linked list — nobu@...
Issue #10278 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
3 messages
2014/09/22
[ruby-core:65028] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10177] Hash#has_key? and Hash#has_value? should be deprecated
From:
meanlogin@...
Date:
2014-09-14 04:43:11 UTC
List:
ruby-core #65028
Issue #10177 has been updated by First Last.
Tsuyoshi Sawada wrote:
> I don't understand how `has_key?` is better
I already explained it, all I can do is restate it.
When the predicate consists of a just single noun or adjective, there is only enough information in it to ask one type of question (Are you?).
Are you a {noun}? (e.g. proc.lambda? => "proc, are you a lambda?")
Are you an {adjective}? (e.g. array.empty? => "array, are you empty?")
It can't mean anything whatsoever (have you?, should you?, countless other inquiries), because then the predicate name would be inscrutable, which is the opposite of the purpose of naming.
If you want to ask something other than "Are you?" there needs to be more information in the method name (e.g. has_key?)
That the conjugation can be off is nothing, next to not knowing what question is being asked.
----------------------------------------
Feature #10177: Hash#has_key? and Hash#has_value? should be deprecated
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10177#change-48896
* Author: gogo tanaka
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* Category: lib
* Target version:
----------------------------------------
I referred to this Matz's remark.
http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-core/43765
And I agree with him, I supposed `Hash#has_key?` should be preferred over `Hash#key?`,
so I replaced all of `Hash#has_key?` and `Hash#has_value?` in `lib/*` with `Hash#key?` and `Hash#value?`
---Files--------------------------------
Replace_Hash#has_something.PATCH (20.4 KB)
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/