[#64703] Add `Hash#fetch_at` (issue #10017) — Wojtek Mach <wojtek@...>
Hey guys
1 message
2014/09/01
[#64711] [ruby-trunk - Bug #10193] [Closed] TestIO#test_readpartial_locktmp fails randomly — nobu@...
Issue #10193 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
3 messages
2014/09/02
[#64744] [ruby-trunk - Bug #10202] [Open] TestBenchmark#test_realtime_output breaks on ARM — v.ondruch@...
Issue #10202 has been reported by Vit Ondruch.
3 messages
2014/09/03
[#64823] documenting constants — Xavier Noria <fxn@...>
I am writing a Rails guide about constant autoloading in Ruby on
5 messages
2014/09/07
[#64838] [ruby-trunk - Bug #10212] [Open] MRI is not for lambda calculus — ko1@...
Issue #10212 has been reported by Koichi Sasada.
6 messages
2014/09/08
[#64858] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #10212] [Open] MRI is not for lambda calculus
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/09/08
rb_env_t may use a flexible array, helps a little even on my busy system:
[#64871] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #10212] [Open] MRI is not for lambda calculus
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/09/08
(2014/09/08 19:48), Eric Wong wrote:
[#64972] [ruby-trunk - Bug #10231] [Open] Process.detach(pid) defines new singleton classes every call — headius@...
Issue #10231 has been reported by Charles Nutter.
3 messages
2014/09/11
[#64980] [ruby-trunk - Bug #10212] MRI is not for lambda calculus — ko1@...
Issue #10212 has been updated by Koichi Sasada.
4 messages
2014/09/12
[#65142] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10267] [Open] Number of processors — akr@...
Issue #10267 has been reported by Akira Tanaka.
4 messages
2014/09/20
[#65144] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #10267] [Open] Number of processors
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/09/20
akr@fsij.org wrote:
[#65210] [ruby-trunk - misc #10278] [Assigned] [RFC] st.c: use ccan linked list — nobu@...
Issue #10278 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
3 messages
2014/09/22
[ruby-core:65260] [ruby-trunk - Bug #10285] StringIO with encodings broken due to #9769
From:
usa@...
Date:
2014-09-24 15:28:09 UTC
List:
ruby-core #65260
Issue #10285 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.
Backport changed from 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN to 2.0.0: REQUIRED, 2.1: REQUIRED
----------------------------------------
Bug #10285: StringIO with encodings broken due to #9769
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10285#change-49088
* Author: Dirkjan Bussink
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* Category:
* Target version:
* ruby -v: 2.1.3
* Backport: 2.0.0: REQUIRED, 2.1: REQUIRED
----------------------------------------
It looks like the change in https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9769 resulted in a behavior change with how StringIO works with different encodings.
The following snippet is broken and now raises:
~~~
test_string_io_encoding.rb:8:in `write': incompatible character encodings: ASCII-8BIT and Windows-1252 (Encoding::CompatibilityError)
from test_string_io_encoding.rb:8:in `<main>'
~~~
~~~
require 'stringio'
io = StringIO.new
io.set_encoding(Encoding::ASCII_8BIT)
io.write("quz \x83 mat".force_encoding(Encoding::ASCII_8BIT))
str = "foo \x97 bar".force_encoding(Encoding::WINDOWS_1252)
io.write(str)
p io.string
~~~
What is the intended behavior here? If I change the code to not set the encoding on the StringIO object, it does work somehow:
~~~
require 'stringio'
io = StringIO.new
io.write("quz \x83 mat".force_encoding(Encoding::ASCII_8BIT))
str = "foo \x97 bar".force_encoding(Encoding::WINDOWS_1252)
io.write(str)
p io.string
~~~
In this case it sees io.string as UTF-8 encoded, but this is invalid. It does allow the second StringIO#write here though.
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/