From: David MacMahon Date: 2014-09-13T17:27:38-07:00 Subject: [ruby-core:65025] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #10228] Statistics module The Ruby/GSL gem provides a Ruby interface to GSL which provides a great deal of statistical functionality and much more besides. Maybe that would meet your needs? On Sep 13, 2014, at 3:56 PM, shevegen@gmail.com wrote: > Issue #10228 has been updated by Robert A. Heiler. > > > I concur that statistics would be useful. > > For bioinformatics I am forced to use R (http://www.r-project.org/) right now. > > Hopefully I can one day replace all of why I have to use R with Ruby (I guess the > biggest problem are not the routines/methods or algorithms but actually those > plotting options). > > A gem can showcase what can be done with statistics addon. > > A require line could then be: > > require 'math/statistics' > > or just > > require 'statistics' > > MS Excel / Libreoffice have quite a lot of standard statistic functions. > AVG() or AVEDEV() or AVERAGEA() and so forth. > > Just giving a bit feedback, don't take me too seriously. :) > > ---------------------------------------- > Feature #10228: Statistics module > https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10228#change-48891 > > * Author: gogo tanaka > * Status: Feedback > * Priority: Normal > * Assignee: > * Category: > * Target version: > ---------------------------------------- > I'm gonna implement some features related with statistics to `Math` module now. > > Like that -> https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10225 > > But I am afraid that `Math` module becomes too complex and suppose such a feature should be apart from `Math` module's responsibility. > > So I'd like to propose Ruby provides Statistics module. (There are plenty of room for discussion.) > > As you know, python3.4 has already started to provide `Statistics` module as Standard Library. > (However these are not enough, I am impressed and think that is awesome trying.) > > I want `Statistics` module which has the features of python's `Statistics` module and some functions related with numerical analysis. > > It should be helpful to make people we couldn't reach so far have interest in Ruby. > > And it is important to provide as "core or standard library". > > But I know there are so many reasons we should not do that, so I want to hear your opinion. > > Thank you. > > > > -- > https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/