[#6143] — Christophe Poucet <christophe.poucet@...>

Hello,

17 messages 2005/10/04
[#6147] Re: patch.tgz — nobu.nokada@... 2005/10/04

Hi,

[#6199] Kernel rdoc HTML file not being created when rdoc is run on 1.8.3 — James Britt <ruby@...>

When 1.8.3 came out, I grabbed the source and ran rdoc on it. After

9 messages 2005/10/08

[#6251] RubyGems, upstream releases and idempotence of packaging — Mauricio Fern疣dez <mfp@...>

[sorry for the very late reply; I left this message in +postponed and forgot

14 messages 2005/10/12

[#6282] Wilderness: Need Code to invoke ELTS_SHARED response — "Charles E. Thornton" <ruby-core@...>

Testing the My Object Dump and I am trying to cause creation

13 messages 2005/10/14
[#6283] Re: Wilderness: Need Code to invoke ELTS_SHARED response — Mauricio Fern疣dez <mfp@...> 2005/10/14

On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 05:04:59PM +0900, Charles E. Thornton wrote:

[#6288] Re: Wilderness: Need Code to invoke ELTS_SHARED response — "Charles E. Thornton" <ruby-core@...> 2005/10/14

Mauricio Fern疣dez wrote:

[#6365] Time for built-in Rational and Complex classes? — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>

There has been some support for, but no comment on, RCR #260 ("Make

12 messages 2005/10/24
[#6366] Re: Time for built-in Rational and Complex classes? — "Ara.T.Howard" <Ara.T.Howard@...> 2005/10/24

On Mon, 24 Oct 2005, Gavin Sinclair wrote:

[#6405] Re: [PATCH] Pathname.exists?() — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

12 messages 2005/10/25
[#6406] Re: [PATCH] Pathname.exists?() — TRANS <transfire@...> 2005/10/25

On 10/25/05, Berger, Daniel <Daniel.Berger@qwest.com> wrote:

[#6408] Re: [PATCH] Pathname.exists?() — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2005/10/25

On 10/26/05, TRANS <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:

[#6442] Wilderness: I Have formatted README.EXT into an HTML Document — "Charles E. Thornton" <ruby-core@...>

I have taken README.EXT (English Version Only) and have reformatted

14 messages 2005/10/27

[#6469] csv.rb a start on refactoring. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>

For a database application I found using CSV to be rather slow.

50 messages 2005/10/28
[#6470] Re: csv.rb a start on refactoring. — "Ara.T.Howard" <Ara.T.Howard@...> 2005/10/28

[#6471] Re: csv.rb a start on refactoring. — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2005/10/28

On Oct 28, 2005, at 8:53 AM, Ara.T.Howard wrote:

[#6474] Re: csv.rb a start on refactoring. — "Ara.T.Howard" <Ara.T.Howard@...> 2005/10/28

On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, James Edward Gray II wrote:

[#6484] Re: csv.rb a start on refactoring. — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2005/10/29

On Oct 28, 2005, at 9:58 AM, Ara.T.Howard wrote:

[#6485] Re: csv.rb a start on refactoring. — "Ara.T.Howard" <Ara.T.Howard@...> 2005/10/29

On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, James Edward Gray II wrote:

[#6486] Re: csv.rb a start on refactoring. — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2005/10/29

On Oct 28, 2005, at 8:25 PM, Ara.T.Howard wrote:

[#6487] Re: csv.rb a start on refactoring. — "Ara.T.Howard" <Ara.T.Howard@...> 2005/10/29

On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, James Edward Gray II wrote:

[#6491] Re: csv.rb a start on refactoring. — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2005/10/29

On Oct 28, 2005, at 8:43 PM, Ara.T.Howard wrote:

[#6493] Re: csv.rb a start on refactoring. — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2005/10/29

On Oct 28, 2005, at 10:06 PM, James Edward Gray II wrote:

[#6496] Re: csv.rb a start on refactoring. — "Ara.T.Howard" <Ara.T.Howard@...> 2005/10/29

On Sun, 30 Oct 2005, James Edward Gray II wrote:

[#6502] Re: csv.rb a start on refactoring. — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2005/10/30

On Oct 29, 2005, at 12:11 PM, Ara.T.Howard wrote:

[#6505] Re: csv.rb a start on refactoring. — "Ara.T.Howard" <Ara.T.Howard@...> 2005/10/30

On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, James Edward Gray II wrote:

[#6511] Planning FasterCSV (was Re: csv.rb a start on refactoring.) — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2005/10/30

I've decided to create a FasterCSV library, based on the code we

[#6516] Re: Planning FasterCSV (was Re: csv.rb a start on refactoring.) — "Ara.T.Howard" <Ara.T.Howard@...> 2005/10/31

On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, James Edward Gray II wrote:

[#6518] Re: Planning FasterCSV (was Re: csv.rb a start on refactoring.) — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 2005/10/31

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Two bugs in 1.9.0 CVS (Was: Re: How do I do a bug report ?)

From: Jean-Claude Arbaut <jcarbaut@...>
Date: 2005-10-23 23:35:30 UTC
List: ruby-core #6359
1.
ruby/ext/tk/lib/tk/canvas.rb contains the same bug as canvas.rb shown below:
  def __item_val2ruby_optkeys(id)  # { key=>proc, ... }
    super(id).update('menu'=>proc{|i, v| window(v)})
  end
  private :__val2ruby_optkeys

There should probably be __item_val2ruby_optkeys.
This bug makes the demo in ruby/ext/tk/sample/demos-en/widget crash.

2.
The Matrix.rows functions doesn't work:

  irb(main):001:0> require 'matrix'
  => true
  irb(main):002:0> Matrix.rows([[1,2],[3,4]])
  NoMethodError: private method `init_rows' called for Matrixnil:Matrix
        from /ux/lib/ruby/1.9/matrix.rb:249:in `send'
        from /ux/lib/ruby/1.9/matrix.rb:249:in `initialize'
        from /ux/lib/ruby/1.9/matrix.rb:134:in `rows'
        from (irb):2

But the file matrix.rb is the same as in 1.8.2, where the function works.
Maybe it's just a compile error on my machine ?


Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> In message "Re: How do I do a bug report ?"
>     on Mon, 24 Oct 2005 06:47:01 +0900, Jean-Claude Arbaut
> <jcarbaut@laposte.net> writes:
> 
> |I tried the CVS version of ruby (1.9.0), and found this in file
> |ruby/ext/tk/lib/tk/canvas.rb:
> |
> |  def __item_val2ruby_optkeys(id)  # { key=>proc, ... }
> |    super(id).update('window'=>proc{|i, v| window(v)})
> |  end
> |  private :__val2ruby_optkeys
> |
> |The last line should be __item_val2ruby_optkeys I think, and
> |with that correction the Canvas example at
> |http://www.rubycentral.com/book/ext_tk.html works fine.
> 
> Thank you for the report.
> 
> |But where should I send this ? And is it really useful to
> |send bug reports about the CVS version ?
> 
> ruby-core mailing list is the best place.  But here in ruby-talk (or
> comp.lang.ruby newsgroup) is fine too.

OK, I'm quite new to this mailing list :-) Thank you.


> |Sorry if this is completely OT...
> 
> I don't think so.
> matz.
> 
> 



In This Thread

Prev Next