[#6115] Ruby 1.8.3: YAML.dump/load cannot handle Bignum — akira yamada / やまだあきら <akira@...>
[#6119] Packaging BOF on Friday the 14th? — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...>
(Crossposted to both ruby-core and rubygems-developers for the benefit
[#6135] ObjectSpace.each_object, but not Symbols? — TRANS <transfire@...>
I added some state to Symbol:
Hi,
Hi,
[#6143] — Christophe Poucet <christophe.poucet@...>
Hello,
Hi,
On Wed, 5 Oct 2005 nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 5 Oct 2005, nobuyoshi nakada wrote:
[#6161] On NullClass or FalseClass#method_missing — TRANS <transfire@...>
Hi--
[#6162] Concerning shared flag — Christophe Poucet <christophe.poucet@...>
Hello,
>>>>> "C" == Christophe Poucet <christophe.poucet@gmail.com> writes:
Hello,
>>>>> "C" == Christophe Poucet <christophe.poucet@gmail.com> writes:
[#6188] yield and call not identical? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Hi --
[#6199] Kernel rdoc HTML file not being created when rdoc is run on 1.8.3 — James Britt <ruby@...>
When 1.8.3 came out, I grabbed the source and ran rdoc on it. After
On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 12:41:02AM +0900, James Britt wrote:
Doug Kearns wrote:
H.Yamamoto wrote:
On 10/19/05, why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@whytheluckystiff.net> wrote:
[#6213] extend and super -- I cannot understand why this behavior — TRANS <transfire@...>
module Q
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005, TRANS wrote:
On 10/10/05, Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca> wrote:
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005, TRANS wrote:
On 10/10/05, Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca> wrote:
[#6235] Keyword arguments in Rite — Daniel Schierbeck <daniel.schierbeck@...>
Hello everybody! I'm new to this list, so please don't flame me if what
Daniel Schierbeck wrote:
[#6251] RubyGems, upstream releases and idempotence of packaging — Mauricio Fern疣dez <mfp@...>
[sorry for the very late reply; I left this message in +postponed and forgot
On 10/13/05, Mauricio Fern疣dez <mfp@acm.org> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 08:55:41PM +0900, Gavin Sinclair wrote:
[#6262] Re: A concrete solution to RubyGems' repackageability problems — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>
On 10/13/05, Mauricio Fern疣dez <mfp@acm.org> wrote:
[#6282] Wilderness: Need Code to invoke ELTS_SHARED response — "Charles E. Thornton" <ruby-core@...>
Testing the My Object Dump and I am trying to cause creation
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 05:04:59PM +0900, Charles E. Thornton wrote:
Mauricio Fern疣dez wrote:
On Oct 14, 2005, at 12:43 PM, Charles E. Thornton wrote:
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 01:34:13PM +0900, Charles Mills wrote:
Mauricio Fern疣dez wrote:
[#6284] Ruby 1.8.3, Gems, Rake and Syck — TRANS <transfire@...>
George Moschovitis tried to send me a gem to try out and it would not install.
On 10/14/05, Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com> wrote:
[#6315] Integer#** weirdness — Peter Vanbroekhoven <calamitates@...>
Hello,
[#6338] Help/Ruby 1.8.3/HP-UX/[BUG] Bus Error — tad.bochan@...
Hi ... need help ...
[#6358] Handle prompts with newlines in irb auto-indentation mode — noreply@...
Bugs item #2705, was opened at 2005-10-23 23:07
Hi,
[#6362] CGI read_multipart implementaion can create Tempfiles for files less than 10KB — noreply@...
Bugs item #2708, was opened at 2005-10-24 15:44
On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:
[#6364] lib/rational.rb documentation — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>
Hi,
[#6365] Time for built-in Rational and Complex classes? — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>
There has been some support for, but no comment on, RCR #260 ("Make
On Mon, 24 Oct 2005, Gavin Sinclair wrote:
On Oct 24, 2005, at 7:14 AM, Ara.T.Howard wrote:
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005, Charles Mills wrote:
On 10/26/05, Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca> wrote:
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, Charles Mills wrote:
On 10/27/05, Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca> wrote:
[#6373] instance_eval/instance_exec discussion — Daniel Amelang <daniel.amelang@...>
Introduction:
Hi,
[#6376] Crash in Tk demo of Ruby 1.9.0 CVS — Jean-Claude Arbaut <jcarbaut@...>
I tried the demos in /ruby/ext/tk/sample/demos-en/widget
[#6389] [PATCH] 1.8.3 ruby.c doesn't compile on OS X due to missing char **environ — noreply@...
Bugs item #2715, was opened at 2005-10-24 23:01
Hi,
[#6391] Threading performance — Wink Saville <wink@...>
Hello all,
[#6396] Nested Exception — Yohanes Santoso <ysantoso-rubycore@...>
Would you accept a patch to provide nested Exception?
[#6402] Pathname.exists?() — James Edward Gray II <james@...>
Pathname supports the legacy exist?() method, but not the current
[#6405] Re: [PATCH] Pathname.exists?() — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
On 10/25/05, Berger, Daniel <Daniel.Berger@qwest.com> wrote:
On 10/26/05, TRANS <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
On 10/25/05, Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 25, 2005, at 11:28 AM, TRANS wrote:
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005, Eric Hodel wrote:
On 10/26/05, Ara.T.Howard <Ara.T.Howard@noaa.gov> wrote:
On 10/25/05, Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@gmail.com> wrote:
[#6419] Refactoring eval.c into eval.c, thread.c, thread.h & eval.h — Wink Saville <wink@...>
Hello,
[#6427] Re: Wilderness: I am working of a TAGS Extension - We Have One? — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
> -----Original Message-----
[#6430] PStore Documentation — James Edward Gray II <james@...>
The attached patch completely documents the PStore library. Please
James Edward Gray II wrote:
[#6442] Wilderness: I Have formatted README.EXT into an HTML Document — "Charles E. Thornton" <ruby-core@...>
I have taken README.EXT (English Version Only) and have reformatted
Hi,
Charles E. Thornton wrote:
[#6455] Wilderness: OK - Let us Try to sending it (not as a reply) — "Charles E. Thornton" <ruby-core@...>
I am sorry - I don't understand this problem
[#6469] csv.rb a start on refactoring. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>
For a database application I found using CSV to be rather slow.
On Oct 28, 2005, at 8:53 AM, Ara.T.Howard wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, James Edward Gray II wrote:
On Oct 28, 2005, at 9:58 AM, Ara.T.Howard wrote:
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, James Edward Gray II wrote:
On Oct 28, 2005, at 8:25 PM, Ara.T.Howard wrote:
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, James Edward Gray II wrote:
On Oct 28, 2005, at 8:43 PM, Ara.T.Howard wrote:
On Oct 28, 2005, at 8:43 PM, Ara.T.Howard wrote:
On Oct 28, 2005, at 10:06 PM, James Edward Gray II wrote:
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005, James Edward Gray II wrote:
On Oct 29, 2005, at 12:11 PM, Ara.T.Howard wrote:
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, James Edward Gray II wrote:
I've decided to create a FasterCSV library, based on the code we
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, James Edward Gray II wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, NAKAMURA, Hiroshi wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, NAKAMURA, Hiroshi wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Wed, 2 Nov 2005, NAKAMURA, Hiroshi wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Oct 29, 2005, at 12:11 PM, Ara.T.Howard wrote:
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, James Edward Gray II wrote:
On Oct 31, 2005, at 11:59 AM, Ara.T.Howard wrote:
[#6508] characters (and small strings) in ruby 2.0 — Eric Mahurin <eric.mahurin@...>
In ruby 2.0, the current plan is to for a character to be represented as a
Re: Integer#** weirdness
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005, Peter Vanbroekhoven wrote: > Seems that Integer#** tries to compare its argument to zero before > coercing. Problem is that I don't want this SomeNumberLikeThing to be > comparable. This is not something very exotic, as not all "number-like" > things are (totally) ordered, e.g., polynomials, matrices and complex > numbers. So IMO Integer#** should coerce before doing anything else with > its argument. What should happen after coercion? if i do 2**aMatrix, is it required that the left side gets promoted to a matrix (that is, the same type as the right-handed argument) ? Then is there any definition of matrix**matrix ? (i haven't ever used one). It would have to extend the semantics of scalar**matrix. Maybe I'm just lost too... But then, x**y = exp(log(x)*y), and since both exp and log are defined on matrices (through use of singular value decomposition), this gives us a natural definition for aMatrix**anotherMatrix. > As a side note, Complex#<=> is defined, but it violates the definition > of an order: Complex(1, 1) >= Complex(1, -1) and Complex(1, 1) <= > Complex(1, -1) but not Complex(1, 1) == Complex(1, -1), which is a > violation of the antisymmetry law. The complex fields (like Q(sqrt(-1)) and C) are not in any way totally orderable. If you quotient the field in some way then you may obtain something totally orderable or not, but the best you can get with an ordinary complex field is a partial order. However Ruby doesn't have a Semicomparable interface (the name i wanted to give to partial ordering in Ruby), despite the Module class already supporting most of it in an implicit way: think about the meaning of "A<B" as "A is subclass of B" aka "A objects are a subset of B objects". What do you think of this? ____________________________________________________________________ Mathieu Bouchard - t駘:+1.514.383.3801 - http://artengine.ca/matju Freelance Digital Arts Engineer, Montr饌l QC Canada