From: why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...>
Date: 2005-10-16T00:05:51+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby 1.8.3, Gems, Rake and Syck

--------------040803030502030404020404
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

TRANS wrote:

>Granted it's effect was on Gems. But just the same, I had no idea the
>source of the bug (in fact I still think it might by Syck itself.) So
>with Ruby, Rake and Syck in play this seems like a very logical place.
>  
>
The problem is my fault, I should have a method call for specifying if a 
doc is headless or no.  A patch is attached for reverting the headless flag.

>Relax dude.
>  
>
T., I've never actually seen this sentence work in the way it is always 
intended.

_why

--------------040803030502030404020404
Content-Type: text/x-patch;
 name="ruby-1.8.3-headless-syck.patch"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline;
 filename="ruby-1.8.3-headless-syck.patch"

diff -wur ruby-1.8.3/ext/syck/rubyext.c ruby-1.8.3-patched/ext/syck/rubyext.c
--- ruby-1.8.3/ext/syck/rubyext.c	2005-09-17 11:17:06.000000000 -0600
+++ ruby-1.8.3-patched/ext/syck/rubyext.c	2005-10-15 09:01:43.000000000 -0600
@@ -2019,7 +2019,7 @@
         rb_ivar_set(self, s_options, options);
     }
     
-    emitter->headless = 1;
+    emitter->headless = 0;
     emitter->bonus = (void *)bonus;
     rb_ivar_set(self, s_level, INT2FIX(0));
     rb_ivar_set(self, s_resolver, Qnil);

--------------040803030502030404020404--