[#61822] Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014 — Zachary Scott <e@...>
I would like to request developers meeting around April 17 or 18 in this month.
14 messages
2014/04/03
[#61825] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
2014/04/03
It's good if we have a meeting then.
[#61826] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Zachary Scott <e@...>
2014/04/03
Regarding openssl issues, I’ve discussed possible meeting time with Martin last month and he seemed positive.
[#61833] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Martin Bo煬et <martin.bosslet@...>
2014/04/03
Hi,
[#61847] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/04/03
Martin Boテ殕et <martin.bosslet@gmail.com> wrote:
[#61849] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Zachary Scott <e@...>
2014/04/04
I will post summary of meeting on Google docs after the meeting.
[#61852] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/04/04
Zachary Scott <e@zzak.io> wrote:
[#61860] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Zachary Scott <e@...>
2014/04/04
I’m ok with redmine, thanks for bringing up your concern!
[#62076] Candidacy to 2.1 branch maintainer. — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <nagachika00@...>
Hello,
7 messages
2014/04/17
[#62078] Re: Candidacy to 2.1 branch maintainer.
— SHIBATA Hiroshi <shibata.hiroshi@...>
2014/04/17
> And does anyone have counter proposal for 2.1 maintenance?
[ruby-core:62123] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8429] Options requests in net/http should be able to accept a response body
From:
jt@...
Date:
2014-04-21 21:56:07 UTC
List:
ruby-core #62123
Issue #8429 has been updated by Joel Ruby. Can we get an update on this? Not sure why it's just sitting here... ---------------------------------------- Feature #8429: Options requests in net/http should be able to accept a response body https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/8429#change-46281 * Author: Chris Rice * Status: Assigned * Priority: Low * Assignee: Yui NARUSE * Category: lib * Target version: next minor ---------------------------------------- As it is currently implemented, Net::HTTP::Options does not allow responses to OPTIONS requests to have a response body: class Net::HTTP::Options < Net::HTTPRequest METHOD = 'OPTIONS' REQUEST_HAS_BODY = false RESPONSE_HAS_BODY = false end According to ((<RFC2616|URL:http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec9.html>)) section 9.2, responses to OPTIONS requests _may_ contain response bodies: "A 200 response SHOULD include any header fields that indicate optional features implemented by the server and applicable to that resource (e.g., Allow), possibly including extensions not defined by this specification. The response body, if any, SHOULD also include information about the communication options." As it currently stands, net/http is not useful for issuing an OPTIONS request to an http server which actually makes use of the response body. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/