[#6115] Ruby 1.8.3: YAML.dump/load cannot handle Bignum — akira yamada / やまだあきら <akira@...>
[#6119] Packaging BOF on Friday the 14th? — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...>
(Crossposted to both ruby-core and rubygems-developers for the benefit
[#6135] ObjectSpace.each_object, but not Symbols? — TRANS <transfire@...>
I added some state to Symbol:
Hi,
Hi,
[#6143] — Christophe Poucet <christophe.poucet@...>
Hello,
Hi,
On Wed, 5 Oct 2005 nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 5 Oct 2005, nobuyoshi nakada wrote:
[#6161] On NullClass or FalseClass#method_missing — TRANS <transfire@...>
Hi--
[#6162] Concerning shared flag — Christophe Poucet <christophe.poucet@...>
Hello,
>>>>> "C" == Christophe Poucet <christophe.poucet@gmail.com> writes:
Hello,
>>>>> "C" == Christophe Poucet <christophe.poucet@gmail.com> writes:
[#6188] yield and call not identical? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Hi --
[#6199] Kernel rdoc HTML file not being created when rdoc is run on 1.8.3 — James Britt <ruby@...>
When 1.8.3 came out, I grabbed the source and ran rdoc on it. After
On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 12:41:02AM +0900, James Britt wrote:
Doug Kearns wrote:
H.Yamamoto wrote:
On 10/19/05, why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@whytheluckystiff.net> wrote:
[#6213] extend and super -- I cannot understand why this behavior — TRANS <transfire@...>
module Q
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005, TRANS wrote:
On 10/10/05, Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca> wrote:
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005, TRANS wrote:
On 10/10/05, Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca> wrote:
[#6235] Keyword arguments in Rite — Daniel Schierbeck <daniel.schierbeck@...>
Hello everybody! I'm new to this list, so please don't flame me if what
Daniel Schierbeck wrote:
[#6251] RubyGems, upstream releases and idempotence of packaging — Mauricio Fern疣dez <mfp@...>
[sorry for the very late reply; I left this message in +postponed and forgot
On 10/13/05, Mauricio Fern疣dez <mfp@acm.org> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 08:55:41PM +0900, Gavin Sinclair wrote:
[#6262] Re: A concrete solution to RubyGems' repackageability problems — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>
On 10/13/05, Mauricio Fern疣dez <mfp@acm.org> wrote:
[#6282] Wilderness: Need Code to invoke ELTS_SHARED response — "Charles E. Thornton" <ruby-core@...>
Testing the My Object Dump and I am trying to cause creation
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 05:04:59PM +0900, Charles E. Thornton wrote:
Mauricio Fern疣dez wrote:
On Oct 14, 2005, at 12:43 PM, Charles E. Thornton wrote:
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 01:34:13PM +0900, Charles Mills wrote:
Mauricio Fern疣dez wrote:
[#6284] Ruby 1.8.3, Gems, Rake and Syck — TRANS <transfire@...>
George Moschovitis tried to send me a gem to try out and it would not install.
On 10/14/05, Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com> wrote:
[#6315] Integer#** weirdness — Peter Vanbroekhoven <calamitates@...>
Hello,
[#6338] Help/Ruby 1.8.3/HP-UX/[BUG] Bus Error — tad.bochan@...
Hi ... need help ...
[#6358] Handle prompts with newlines in irb auto-indentation mode — noreply@...
Bugs item #2705, was opened at 2005-10-23 23:07
Hi,
[#6362] CGI read_multipart implementaion can create Tempfiles for files less than 10KB — noreply@...
Bugs item #2708, was opened at 2005-10-24 15:44
On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:
[#6364] lib/rational.rb documentation — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>
Hi,
[#6365] Time for built-in Rational and Complex classes? — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>
There has been some support for, but no comment on, RCR #260 ("Make
On Mon, 24 Oct 2005, Gavin Sinclair wrote:
On Oct 24, 2005, at 7:14 AM, Ara.T.Howard wrote:
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005, Charles Mills wrote:
On 10/26/05, Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca> wrote:
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, Charles Mills wrote:
On 10/27/05, Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca> wrote:
[#6373] instance_eval/instance_exec discussion — Daniel Amelang <daniel.amelang@...>
Introduction:
Hi,
[#6376] Crash in Tk demo of Ruby 1.9.0 CVS — Jean-Claude Arbaut <jcarbaut@...>
I tried the demos in /ruby/ext/tk/sample/demos-en/widget
[#6389] [PATCH] 1.8.3 ruby.c doesn't compile on OS X due to missing char **environ — noreply@...
Bugs item #2715, was opened at 2005-10-24 23:01
Hi,
[#6391] Threading performance — Wink Saville <wink@...>
Hello all,
[#6396] Nested Exception — Yohanes Santoso <ysantoso-rubycore@...>
Would you accept a patch to provide nested Exception?
[#6402] Pathname.exists?() — James Edward Gray II <james@...>
Pathname supports the legacy exist?() method, but not the current
[#6405] Re: [PATCH] Pathname.exists?() — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
On 10/25/05, Berger, Daniel <Daniel.Berger@qwest.com> wrote:
On 10/26/05, TRANS <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
On 10/25/05, Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 25, 2005, at 11:28 AM, TRANS wrote:
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005, Eric Hodel wrote:
On 10/26/05, Ara.T.Howard <Ara.T.Howard@noaa.gov> wrote:
On 10/25/05, Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@gmail.com> wrote:
[#6419] Refactoring eval.c into eval.c, thread.c, thread.h & eval.h — Wink Saville <wink@...>
Hello,
[#6427] Re: Wilderness: I am working of a TAGS Extension - We Have One? — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
> -----Original Message-----
[#6430] PStore Documentation — James Edward Gray II <james@...>
The attached patch completely documents the PStore library. Please
James Edward Gray II wrote:
[#6442] Wilderness: I Have formatted README.EXT into an HTML Document — "Charles E. Thornton" <ruby-core@...>
I have taken README.EXT (English Version Only) and have reformatted
Hi,
Charles E. Thornton wrote:
[#6455] Wilderness: OK - Let us Try to sending it (not as a reply) — "Charles E. Thornton" <ruby-core@...>
I am sorry - I don't understand this problem
[#6469] csv.rb a start on refactoring. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>
For a database application I found using CSV to be rather slow.
On Oct 28, 2005, at 8:53 AM, Ara.T.Howard wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, James Edward Gray II wrote:
On Oct 28, 2005, at 9:58 AM, Ara.T.Howard wrote:
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, James Edward Gray II wrote:
On Oct 28, 2005, at 8:25 PM, Ara.T.Howard wrote:
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, James Edward Gray II wrote:
On Oct 28, 2005, at 8:43 PM, Ara.T.Howard wrote:
On Oct 28, 2005, at 8:43 PM, Ara.T.Howard wrote:
On Oct 28, 2005, at 10:06 PM, James Edward Gray II wrote:
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005, James Edward Gray II wrote:
On Oct 29, 2005, at 12:11 PM, Ara.T.Howard wrote:
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, James Edward Gray II wrote:
I've decided to create a FasterCSV library, based on the code we
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, James Edward Gray II wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, NAKAMURA, Hiroshi wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, NAKAMURA, Hiroshi wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Wed, 2 Nov 2005, NAKAMURA, Hiroshi wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Oct 29, 2005, at 12:11 PM, Ara.T.Howard wrote:
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, James Edward Gray II wrote:
On Oct 31, 2005, at 11:59 AM, Ara.T.Howard wrote:
[#6508] characters (and small strings) in ruby 2.0 — Eric Mahurin <eric.mahurin@...>
In ruby 2.0, the current plan is to for a character to be represented as a
Re: Question about cgi.rb's read_multipart method and possible fix
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 16:02:00 +0900, Zev Blut <rubyzbibd@ubit.com> wrote: > My colleagues and I have discovered a potential problem with the > implementation of the CGI library's read_multipart method. The > current CGI implementation will create a temporary file for many of > the multipart data entries if the posted content length is greater > than 10 kilobytes. > > I would like to ask what is the intended goal of the implementation? > Is the goal to make temporary files for each data entry that is more > than 10 kilobytes and keep entries that are less in StringIO objects? > > The reason I ask is that the current implementation works in a > different way. It will create temporary files for each data entry > until the remaining content data stream is less than 10 kilobytes. > Then it will use StringIO for the remaining entries. > > This implementation turns out to have disastrous consequences for some > of my applications. We have some situations where we send images and > many select options in a post. This ends up creating hundreds and > sometimes thousands of Tempfiles, which causes our servers to become > unresponsive. > > I have modified read_multipart to only create TempFiles for each data > entry greater than 10 kilobytes. With this modification our servers > are responsive and show no other problems with my change. > > I have made a few other changes to the implementation to use sub! > method calls to hopefully remove unneeded duplication of large buffers. > I dug through the CVS history and it appears it was originally using > such a sub! call, but later when to "buf = buf.sub" calls, is there a > reason why? If so I will revert back to "buf = buf.sub". > > Ignoring a few minor style changes in my implementation and or my > implementation all together, the main point of discussion I would like > to start is if the current 10 kilobyte implementation is correct of if > the intended goal of my modification is correct? If my modification > is not too offensive I can integrate it with cgi.rb and post a patch. Am I not being clear or is everyone too busy? :-) Cheers, Zev