[#58149] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9076][Open] New one-argument block syntax: &. — "asterite (Ary Borenszweig)" <ary@...>

23 messages 2013/11/04

[#58176] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9082][Open] popen3 hangs when stderr gets lots of output — "rosenfeld (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas)" <rr.rosas@...>

15 messages 2013/11/05

[#58207] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9089][Open] rb_fix2uint no longer raises a RangeError when given negative values — "NoKarma (Arthur Schreiber)" <schreiber.arthur@...>

9 messages 2013/11/06

[#58243] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9098][Open] Indent heredoc against the left margin by default when "indented closing identifier" is turned on. — "sikachu (Prem Sichanugrist)" <s@...>

24 messages 2013/11/09

[#58306] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9106][Open] 'gem install' doesn't copy .so files of ext libs — "tagomoris (Satoshi TAGOMORI)" <tagomoris@...>

15 messages 2013/11/13

[#58324] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9108][Open] Hash sub-selections — "wardrop (Tom Wardrop)" <tom@...>

28 messages 2013/11/14

[#58342] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9112][Open] Make module lookup more dynamic (Including modules into a module after it has already been included) — "PragTob (Tobias Pfeiffer)" <pragtob@...>

16 messages 2013/11/14

[#58350] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9113][Open] Ship Ruby for Linux with jemalloc out-of-the-box — "sam.saffron (Sam Saffron)" <sam.saffron@...>

59 messages 2013/11/15

[#58374] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9115][Open] Logger traps all exceptions; breaks Timeout — "cphoenix (Chris Phoenix)" <cphoenix@...>

10 messages 2013/11/16

[#58375] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9116][Open] String#rsplit missing — "artagnon (Ramkumar Ramachandra)" <artagnon@...>

12 messages 2013/11/16

[#58396] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9121][Open] [PATCH] Remove rbtree implementation of SortedSet due to performance regression — "xshay (Xavier Shay)" <contact@...>

15 messages 2013/11/18

[#58404] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9123][Open] Make Numeric#nonzero? behavior consistent with Numeric#zero? — "sferik (Erik Michaels-Ober)" <sferik@...>

40 messages 2013/11/18

[#58411] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9124][Open] TestSocket errors in test-all on Arch 64-bit — "jonforums (Jon Forums)" <redmine@...>

14 messages 2013/11/18

[#58438] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9129][Open] Regression in support for IPv6 literals in URIs with Net::HTTP — "kallistec (Daniel DeLeo)" <dan@...>

11 messages 2013/11/19

[#58545] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9145][Open] Queue#pop(true) return nil if empty instead of raising ThreadError — "jsc (Justin Collins)" <redmine@...>

9 messages 2013/11/24

[#58653] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9170][Open] Math.sqrt returns different types when mathn is included; breaks various gems - this bug can be reproduced in Ruby 1.8 as well — "kranzky (Jason Hutchens)" <JasonHutchens@...>

7 messages 2013/11/28

[ruby-core:58429] [Ruby 1.8 - Feature #4239][Closed] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?

From: "shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe)" <shyouhei@...>
Date: 2013-11-19 12:06:39 UTC
List: ruby-core #58429
Issue #4239 has been updated by shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe).

Description updated
Status changed from Assigned to Closed

This target version no lnger exists.  I'd like to take this opportunity to thank you all.
----------------------------------------
Feature #4239: Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/4239#change-43024

Author: sorah (Shota Fukumori)
Status: Closed
Priority: Normal
Assignee: shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe)
Category: core
Target version: Ruby 1.8.8


=begin
 ###########################
 # This issue is translated from #4207.
 # For Japanese: This translation needs proofreading. If you have a patch, please send to sorah[at]tubusu[dot]net.
 # Newer version of translation available at: https://gist.github.com/b2c4f223d3ee0bca72ad
 ###########################
 
 # http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/4207
 = Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
 
 Hi,
 
 I know that we cannot release ruby_1_8 branch... more than anyone.
 
 But the time past 3 years from 1.9.0, and 2.5 years from 1.8.7;
 it will be turned to 3 years in June 2011.
 
 Why I'm marking "3 years," because releasing interval over 3 years
 first time ever, and almost systems have revised after 3 years from
 developed in my experience... so, almost codes which targets 1.8.7
 preparing to revised; I think.
 
 Well, Which version used when codes which targets 1.8.7 are revised,
 I recommend 1.9.2 on my post, but almost can't use 1.9.x in
 actuality. Like, Extension libraries doesn't work. 
 When can't use 1.9.x in codes, so it means use only 1.8.7. but it is
 really tough, for making tasks with 1.8.7, and I think that when I 
 can give up maintaining 1.8.7? when my motivation is decreasing in
 future, it won't increase again. So I want to use new version,
 and don't use 1.8.7. New codes must target newer versions.
 
 So, I want to set directions about 1.8.x future. I'm considing that
 destroy ruby_1_8 branch and we won't release 1.8.8 for a one of
 ideas. If we won't release 1.8.8, it means that can publish
 announcement about 1.8.7 is last version of 1.8 branch,then 1.8
 goes to last maintainance release. ah, in simplicity developers
 task is decreased; developers will be happy.
 
 P.S.: I hope that people in a posision like Endoh Yusuke at 1.9.2.
 Anyone?
 
 ###
 # http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/4207#note-6
 
 Well, Organize this issue without my factors, currently we have the following
 issues of 1.8.8.
 
 * the time past 3 years from 1.9.0 released. In last 3 years, We released
   1.9.2 smoothly at 1.9 branch. Thanks Yugui (Yuki Sonoda).
   Also many users are using 1.9.x at forms of RailsDevCon.
   http://railsdevcon.jp/RailsDevCon2010report.pdf
 * 1.8.8 (and 1.8.7?) is on migration step to 1.9, but if we continue
   developing 1.8.8 at this rate and release 1.8.8 in 2020, do users which
   haven't migrated to 1.9 exist?
 * Currently does ruby_1_8 include any prompting structures to migrate
   1.9.x more than 1.8.7 at all? Just not merged same patches as 1.9?
 * "I want to release so I release. Any users didn't effect." is a one of
   views, but it makes unhappy by recognition differences?
 
 So.. Because 1.8 mustn't let be uncontrolled,
   I propose the following ideas which possible:
 
 1. Not today but ASAP, release 1.8.8 as "better 1.8.7." Release goal is this
    Summer.
 2. Develop 1.8.8 until it's approached to ideal. Users can't be affect.
    Release goal is 2020 Christmas.
 3. We won't release 1.8.8 never. Drop.
 4. Otherwise I haven't thought yet.
 
 I don't specify any idea for adoption.
 Anyhow, I think that 1.8 mustn't keep current principle, so I asking "What do we do?"
 
 Well.. what do we do?
=end



-- 
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

In This Thread

Prev Next