[#58149] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9076][Open] New one-argument block syntax: &. — "asterite (Ary Borenszweig)" <ary@...>

23 messages 2013/11/04

[#58176] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9082][Open] popen3 hangs when stderr gets lots of output — "rosenfeld (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas)" <rr.rosas@...>

15 messages 2013/11/05

[#58207] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9089][Open] rb_fix2uint no longer raises a RangeError when given negative values — "NoKarma (Arthur Schreiber)" <schreiber.arthur@...>

9 messages 2013/11/06

[#58243] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9098][Open] Indent heredoc against the left margin by default when "indented closing identifier" is turned on. — "sikachu (Prem Sichanugrist)" <s@...>

24 messages 2013/11/09

[#58306] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9106][Open] 'gem install' doesn't copy .so files of ext libs — "tagomoris (Satoshi TAGOMORI)" <tagomoris@...>

15 messages 2013/11/13

[#58324] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9108][Open] Hash sub-selections — "wardrop (Tom Wardrop)" <tom@...>

28 messages 2013/11/14

[#58342] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9112][Open] Make module lookup more dynamic (Including modules into a module after it has already been included) — "PragTob (Tobias Pfeiffer)" <pragtob@...>

16 messages 2013/11/14

[#58350] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9113][Open] Ship Ruby for Linux with jemalloc out-of-the-box — "sam.saffron (Sam Saffron)" <sam.saffron@...>

59 messages 2013/11/15

[#58374] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9115][Open] Logger traps all exceptions; breaks Timeout — "cphoenix (Chris Phoenix)" <cphoenix@...>

10 messages 2013/11/16

[#58375] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9116][Open] String#rsplit missing — "artagnon (Ramkumar Ramachandra)" <artagnon@...>

12 messages 2013/11/16

[#58396] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9121][Open] [PATCH] Remove rbtree implementation of SortedSet due to performance regression — "xshay (Xavier Shay)" <contact@...>

15 messages 2013/11/18

[#58404] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9123][Open] Make Numeric#nonzero? behavior consistent with Numeric#zero? — "sferik (Erik Michaels-Ober)" <sferik@...>

40 messages 2013/11/18

[#58411] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9124][Open] TestSocket errors in test-all on Arch 64-bit — "jonforums (Jon Forums)" <redmine@...>

14 messages 2013/11/18

[#58438] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9129][Open] Regression in support for IPv6 literals in URIs with Net::HTTP — "kallistec (Daniel DeLeo)" <dan@...>

11 messages 2013/11/19

[#58545] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9145][Open] Queue#pop(true) return nil if empty instead of raising ThreadError — "jsc (Justin Collins)" <redmine@...>

9 messages 2013/11/24

[#58653] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9170][Open] Math.sqrt returns different types when mathn is included; breaks various gems - this bug can be reproduced in Ruby 1.8 as well — "kranzky (Jason Hutchens)" <JasonHutchens@...>

7 messages 2013/11/28

[ruby-core:58238] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9095] Allow `Symbol#to_proc` to take arguments

From: "alexeymuranov (Alexey Muranov)" <redmine@...>
Date: 2013-11-09 19:25:12 UTC
List: ruby-core #58238
Issue #9095 has been updated by alexeymuranov (Alexey Muranov).


=begin
  Hanmac (Hans Mackowiak) wrote:
  > i did something similar to that there:
  > https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9076#note-9

Hans, your proposal does not look good to me.  IMO, it is strange to make symbols callable and it is strange to add to the responsibilities of (({Symbol})) to maintain some (({SymbolHelper})), which looks to me more like a (({ProcBuilder})).  Also, using (({method_missing})) is always a bit scary to me.

You seem to propose, instead of

  [1, 10, 100].map{|x| x.to_s.length.to_f } # => [1.0, 2.0, 3.0]

to write

  [1, 10, 100].map &:to_s.call.length.to_f  # => [1.0, 2.0, 3.0]

At least i would have called this method (({#to_symbol_helper})) instead of (({#call})).

As (({#method_missing})) will not catch call of (({#to_proc})), there will be inevitably exceptions to the general rule:

  [1, 2, 3].map{|i| i.method(:**).to_proc.call(2) } # => [1, 4, 9]
  [1, 2, 3].map &:method.(:**).to_proc.call(2)      # => [2, 4, 8]

If we did not care about such ambiguities, i might have proposed something like this:

  class ProcFromCallsBuilder < BasicObject
    def initialize(&block)
      @proc = block
    end

    def call(*a, &b)
      @proc[*a, &b]
    end

    alias [] call

    def to_proc
      @proc
    end

    def method_missing(m, *args, &block)
      if @proc.nil?
        ::Module.nesting.first.new do |x|
          x.public_send(m, *args, &block)
        end
      else
        ::Module.nesting.first.new do |x|
          @proc[x].public_send(m, *args, &block)
        end
      end
    end
  end

  A = ProcFromCallsBuilder.new

  p [1, 10, 100].map &A.to_s.length.to_f # => [1.0, 2.0, 3.0]
=end
----------------------------------------
Feature #9095: Allow `Symbol#to_proc` to take arguments
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9095#change-42828

Author: alexeymuranov (Alexey Muranov)
Status: Open
Priority: Normal
Assignee: 
Category: 
Target version: 


=begin
After discussing #9076, i've decided to propose this:

  class Symbol
    def to_proc(*args)
      proc do |x|
        x.public_send(self, *args)
      end
    end
  end

  p = :+.to_proc(1)

  p[2] # => 3

  [1, 2, 3, 4].map &:to_s.to_proc(2) #=> ["1", "10", "11", "100"]

This would allow constructing more kinds of procs without using literal blocks.
=end


-- 
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

In This Thread

Prev Next