[#58149] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9076][Open] New one-argument block syntax: &. — "asterite (Ary Borenszweig)" <ary@...>

23 messages 2013/11/04

[#58176] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9082][Open] popen3 hangs when stderr gets lots of output — "rosenfeld (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas)" <rr.rosas@...>

15 messages 2013/11/05

[#58207] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9089][Open] rb_fix2uint no longer raises a RangeError when given negative values — "NoKarma (Arthur Schreiber)" <schreiber.arthur@...>

9 messages 2013/11/06

[#58243] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9098][Open] Indent heredoc against the left margin by default when "indented closing identifier" is turned on. — "sikachu (Prem Sichanugrist)" <s@...>

24 messages 2013/11/09

[#58306] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9106][Open] 'gem install' doesn't copy .so files of ext libs — "tagomoris (Satoshi TAGOMORI)" <tagomoris@...>

15 messages 2013/11/13

[#58324] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9108][Open] Hash sub-selections — "wardrop (Tom Wardrop)" <tom@...>

28 messages 2013/11/14

[#58342] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9112][Open] Make module lookup more dynamic (Including modules into a module after it has already been included) — "PragTob (Tobias Pfeiffer)" <pragtob@...>

16 messages 2013/11/14

[#58350] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9113][Open] Ship Ruby for Linux with jemalloc out-of-the-box — "sam.saffron (Sam Saffron)" <sam.saffron@...>

59 messages 2013/11/15

[#58374] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9115][Open] Logger traps all exceptions; breaks Timeout — "cphoenix (Chris Phoenix)" <cphoenix@...>

10 messages 2013/11/16

[#58375] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9116][Open] String#rsplit missing — "artagnon (Ramkumar Ramachandra)" <artagnon@...>

12 messages 2013/11/16

[#58396] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9121][Open] [PATCH] Remove rbtree implementation of SortedSet due to performance regression — "xshay (Xavier Shay)" <contact@...>

15 messages 2013/11/18

[#58404] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9123][Open] Make Numeric#nonzero? behavior consistent with Numeric#zero? — "sferik (Erik Michaels-Ober)" <sferik@...>

40 messages 2013/11/18

[#58411] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9124][Open] TestSocket errors in test-all on Arch 64-bit — "jonforums (Jon Forums)" <redmine@...>

14 messages 2013/11/18

[#58438] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9129][Open] Regression in support for IPv6 literals in URIs with Net::HTTP — "kallistec (Daniel DeLeo)" <dan@...>

11 messages 2013/11/19

[#58545] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9145][Open] Queue#pop(true) return nil if empty instead of raising ThreadError — "jsc (Justin Collins)" <redmine@...>

9 messages 2013/11/24

[#58653] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9170][Open] Math.sqrt returns different types when mathn is included; breaks various gems - this bug can be reproduced in Ruby 1.8 as well — "kranzky (Jason Hutchens)" <JasonHutchens@...>

7 messages 2013/11/28

[ruby-core:58517] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9123][Open] Make Numeric#nonzero? behavior consistent with Numeric#zero?

From: Fuad Saud <fuadksd@...>
Date: 2013-11-23 02:15:40 UTC
List: ruby-core #58517
I don't understand why we would want to be so strict about types on this
case. Having some arbitrary value being returned is useful and it doesn't
hurt any good practices. Ensuring predicates return true or false feels
useless for me

On Friday, November 22, 2013, mame (Yusuke Endoh) wrote:

>
> Issue #9123 has been updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh).
>
>
> avit (Andrew Vit) wrote:
> >     42.nonzero? #=> 42
> >     0.nonzero?  #=> false
>
>
> In fact, the first version of nonzero? returned self or false.
>
> Inaba, in [ruby-dev:6417] (22 Mar 1999), suggested a convention about the
> usage
> of nil and false.
>
>   * if a method returns only a boolean, it should use true and false
>   * if a method returns a general object but also "false" value, it should
> use nil
>
> Matz accepted it, and adopted the convention to another exception,
> defined?.
> As far as I know, this is the only spec change of nonzero? ever.
>
>
> Inaba pointed out that a method whose name ends with "?" would make a user
> feel
> that it should return only a boolean, though he also admitted that it is
> difficult
> to change because of compatibility issue (in 1999).
> Matz agreed, and said that "?" is a symbol that is "mainly used as a
> predicate".
>
> --
> Yusuke Endoh <mame@tsg.ne.jp <javascript:;>>
> ----------------------------------------
> Feature #9123: Make Numeric#nonzero? behavior consistent with Numeric#zero?
> https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9123#change-43094
>
> Author: sferik (Erik Michaels-Ober)
> Status: Open
> Priority: Normal
> Assignee:
> Category:
> Target version:
>
>
> Numeric#zero? returns true or false, while Numeric#nonzero? returns self
> or nil.
>
> I've written a patch that fixes this inconsistency and adds a
> Numeric#nonzero (non-predicate) method that returns self or nil for
> chaining comparisons. I'd like for this to be included in Ruby 2.1.0.
>
> https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/452.patch
>
>
> --
> http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
>


-- 
Fuad Saud

twitter <http://twitter.com/fuadsaud> |
linkedin<http://www.linkedin.com/in/fuadksd>|
coderwall <http://coderwal.com/fuadsaud> | github<http://github.com/fuadsaud>|

In This Thread