From: "duerst (Martin Dürst)" <duerst@...>
Date: 2013-02-27T15:53:05+09:00
Subject: [ruby-core:52985] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6841] Shorthand for Assigning Return Value of Method to Self


Issue #6841 has been updated by duerst (Martin D��rst).


wardrop (Tom Wardrop) wrote:
> =begin
> Quite often in Ruby, I find myself doing something like: (({my_var[:foo][:bar] = my_var[:foo][:bar].to_i})) or (({obj.foo.bar = obj.foo.bar.to_i})). Realising this, I thought of what would be a fairly nice shorthand syntax for this, which could be: (({my_var[:foo][:bar] .= to_i})).

What about introducing to_i!. This would look more like Ruby.

----------------------------------------
Feature #6841: Shorthand for Assigning Return Value of Method to Self
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/6841#change-37136

Author: wardrop (Tom Wardrop)
Status: Assigned
Priority: Normal
Assignee: matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Category: core
Target version: Next Major


=begin
Quite often in Ruby, I find myself doing something like: (({my_var[:foo][:bar] = my_var[:foo][:bar].to_i})) or (({obj.foo.bar = obj.foo.bar.to_i})). Realising this, I thought of what would be a fairly nice shorthand syntax for this, which could be: (({my_var[:foo][:bar] .= to_i})). How this works should be pretty self-explanatory. The (({.=})) operator works exactly like any other assignment operator of this nature.

Would be nice to see this in Ruby 2.0. Wondering what others think of this?
=end


-- 
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/