[#57574] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8976][Open] file-scope freeze_string directive — "akr (Akira Tanaka)" <akr@...>
70 messages
2013/10/02
[#57579] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8977][Open] String#frozen that takes advantage of the deduping — "sam.saffron (Sam Saffron)" <sam.saffron@...>
25 messages
2013/10/02
[#57633] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8983][Open] [PATCH] GC.stat[:heap_free_num] returns number of unused slots on heap — "tmm1 (Aman Gupta)" <ruby@...1.net>
8 messages
2013/10/03
[#57667] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8985][Open] xwillfree - promise to free memory — "funny_falcon (Yura Sokolov)" <funny.falcon@...>
5 messages
2013/10/04
[#57679] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8987][Open] map/collect extension which handles arguments — "sowieso (So Wieso)" <sowieso@...>
16 messages
2013/10/05
[#57680] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8987] map/collect extension which handles arguments
— "sawa (Tsuyoshi Sawada)" <sawadatsuyoshi@...>
2013/10/05
[#57693] [PATCH 0/2] Fix strptime '%s' — Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...>
Hi,
7 messages
2013/10/07
[#57694] [PATCH 1/2] time: fix strptime '%s'
— Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...>
2013/10/07
'%s' is meant to imply UTC, however:
[#57703] Re: [PATCH 1/2] time: fix strptime '%s'
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2013/10/07
2013/10/7 Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>:
[#57711] Re: [PATCH 1/2] time: fix strptime '%s'
— Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...>
2013/10/07
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org> wrote:
[#57705] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8992][Open] Use String#freeze and compiler tricks to replace "str"f suffix — "headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@...>
43 messages
2013/10/07
[#57840] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8992] Use String#freeze and compiler tricks to replace "str"f suffix
— "sam.saffron (Sam Saffron)" <sam.saffron@...>
2013/10/13
[#57727] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8998][Open] string keys for hash literals should use fstrings — "normalperson (Eric Wong)" <normalperson@...>
17 messages
2013/10/08
[#57743] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8998] string keys for hash literals should use fstrings
— "normalperson (Eric Wong)" <normalperson@...>
2013/10/08
[#57756] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #8998] string keys for hash literals should use fstrings
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2013/10/09
I think my failed patch exposes a bug with lazy sweep + rb_fstring.
[#57771] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9008][Open] TestProcess#test_clock_getres_constants and TestProcess#test_clock_gettime_constants fails on ARM — "vo.x (Vit Ondruch)" <v.ondruch@...>
15 messages
2013/10/09
[#57852] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9008] TestProcess#test_clock_getres_constants and TestProcess#test_clock_gettime_constants fails on ARM
— "kosaki (Motohiro KOSAKI)" <kosaki.motohiro@...>
2013/10/14
[#57884] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9008] TestProcess#test_clock_getres_constants and TestProcess#test_clock_gettime_constants fails on ARM
— "kosaki (Motohiro KOSAKI)" <kosaki.motohiro@...>
2013/10/15
[#57794] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9011][Open] rb_fstring unsafe to use in general case — "normalperson (Eric Wong)" <normalperson@...>
4 messages
2013/10/10
[#57812] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9013][Open] Crash on start — "lemonez (Dmitry Popov)" <lemon@...>
6 messages
2013/10/10
[#57849] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9020][Open] Net::HTTPResponse predicate/query methods — "timcraft (Tim Craft)" <redmine@...>
7 messages
2013/10/14
[#57862] [CommonRuby - Feature #9023][Open] Array#tail — "fuadksd (Fuad Saud)" <fuadksd@...>
9 messages
2013/10/15
[#57888] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9025][Open] Clarify the error message when calling a method with the wrong number of arguments — Nerian (Gonzalo Rodríguez) <siotopo@...>
11 messages
2013/10/15
[#57913] cxxflags for C++ library bindings not working for Ruby 1.9.x and 2.0? — Stefan Salewski <mail@...>
Dear Sirs,
4 messages
2013/10/17
[#57916] Re: cxxflags for C++ library bindings not working for Ruby 1.9.x and 2.0?
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2013/10/17
(13/10/17 22:03), Stefan Salewski wrote:
[#57950] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9039][Open] [PATCH] socket: avoid unnecessary ppoll/select on Linux (part 3) — "normalperson (Eric Wong)" <normalperson@...>
8 messages
2013/10/21
[#57951] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9040][Open] Readline duplicate file descriptors but doesn't close them — "eweb (Eamonn Webster)" <eamonn.webster@...>
8 messages
2013/10/21
[#57986] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9040] Readline duplicate file descriptors but doesn't close them
— "akr (Akira Tanaka)" <akr@...>
2013/10/23
[#57967] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9043][Open] Add String#f method as shortcut for #freeze — "headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@...>
8 messages
2013/10/22
[#58007] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9049][Open] Shorthands (a:b, *) for inclusive indexing — "mohawkjohn (John Woods)" <john.o.woods@...>
25 messages
2013/10/24
[#58011] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9049] Shorthands (a:b, *) for inclusive indexing
— "boris_stitnicky (Boris Stitnicky)" <boris@...>
2013/10/24
[#58012] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9049] Shorthands (a:b, *) for inclusive indexing
— David MacMahon <davidm@...>
2013/10/24
[#58013] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9049] Shorthands (a:b, *) for inclusive indexing
— Fuad Saud <fuadksd@...>
2013/10/24
How is a:b better than a..b? two dots are straightforward, unambiguous, well known.
[#58080] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9064][Open] Add support for packages, like in Java — "rosenfeld (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas)" <rr.rosas@...>
23 messages
2013/10/30
[#58083] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9064] Add support for packages, like in Java
— "rosenfeld (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas)" <rr.rosas@...>
2013/10/30
[#58114] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9068][Open] [PATCH (trivial)] thread.c: reduce rb_mutex_t size by 8 bytes on x86_64 — "normalperson (Eric Wong)" <normalperson@...>
5 messages
2013/10/31
[#58115] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9068][Open] [PATCH (trivial)] thread.c: reduce rb_mutex_t size by 8 bytes on x86_64
— KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...>
2013/10/31
(10/31/13 3:42 PM), normalperson (Eric Wong) wrote:
[#58116] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9068][Open] [PATCH (trivial)] thread.c: reduce rb_mutex_t size by 8 bytes on x86_64
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2013/10/31
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com> wrote:
[ruby-core:57804] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7976][Feedback] TracePoint call is at call point, not call site
From:
"ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>
Date:
2013-10-10 09:06:43 UTC
List:
ruby-core #57804
Issue #7976 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).
Status changed from Open to Feedback
This behavior is same as backtrace.
Nearest file name and line number is used for C call,
because there are no file name and line for C methods.
# modify trace as follows:
tp = TracePoint.new(:call, :return, :c_call, :c_return, :raise) do |t|
p caller(1, 1)[0].inspect + ("%-9p %s:%02d %p" % [t.event, t.path, t.lineno, t.method_id])
end
#=>
ruby 2.1.0dev (2013-10-10 trunk 43236) [i386-mswin32_110]
"\"tp_test.rb:5:in `<main>'\":c_return tp_test.rb:05 :enable"
"\"tp_test.rb:7:in `<main>'\":c_call tp_test.rb:07 :inherited"
"\"tp_test.rb:7:in `<main>'\":c_return tp_test.rb:07 :inherited"
"\"tp_test.rb:8:in `<class:X>'\":c_call tp_test.rb:08 :method_added"
"\"tp_test.rb:8:in `<class:X>'\":c_return tp_test.rb:08 :method_added"
"\"tp_test.rb:12:in `<class:X>'\":c_call tp_test.rb:12 :method_added"
"\"tp_test.rb:12:in `<class:X>'\":c_return tp_test.rb:12 :method_added"
"\"tp_test.rb:16:in `<class:X>'\":c_call tp_test.rb:16 :method_added"
"\"tp_test.rb:16:in `<class:X>'\":c_return tp_test.rb:16 :method_added"
"\"tp_test.rb:21:in `<main>'\":c_call tp_test.rb:21 :new"
"\"tp_test.rb:21:in `new'\":c_call tp_test.rb:21 :initialize"
"\"tp_test.rb:21:in `new'\":c_return tp_test.rb:21 :initialize"
"\"tp_test.rb:21:in `<main>'\":c_return tp_test.rb:21 :new"
"\"tp_test.rb:8:in `x'\":call tp_test.rb:08 :x"
"\"tp_test.rb:12:in `y'\":call tp_test.rb:12 :y"
"\"tp_test.rb:16:in `z'\":call tp_test.rb:16 :z"
"\"tp_test.rb:17:in `z'\":c_call tp_test.rb:17 :raise"
"\"tp_test.rb:17:in `raise'\":c_call tp_test.rb:17 :new"
"\"tp_test.rb:17:in `new'\":c_call tp_test.rb:17 :initialize"
"\"tp_test.rb:17:in `new'\":c_return tp_test.rb:17 :initialize"
"\"tp_test.rb:17:in `raise'\":c_return tp_test.rb:17 :new"
"\"tp_test.rb:17:in `z'\":c_call tp_test.rb:17 :backtrace"
"\"tp_test.rb:17:in `z'\":c_return tp_test.rb:17 :backtrace"
"\"tp_test.rb:17:in `z'\":raise tp_test.rb:17 :z"
"\"tp_test.rb:17:in `z'\":c_return tp_test.rb:17 :raise"
"\"tp_test.rb:17:in `z'\":return tp_test.rb:17 :z"
"\"tp_test.rb:13:in `y'\":return tp_test.rb:13 :y"
"\"tp_test.rb:9:in `x'\":return tp_test.rb:09 :x"
tp_test.rb:17:in `z': no (RuntimeError)
from tp_test.rb:13:in `y'
from tp_test.rb:9:in `x'
from tp_test.rb:21:in `<main>'
And binding is also nearest Ruby level binding.
tp = TracePoint.trace(:call, :return, :c_call, :c_return, :raise) do |t|
p [t, t.self, t.binding.eval('self')]
end
tp.enable
#=>
ruby 2.1.0dev (2013-10-10 trunk 43236) [i386-mswin32_110]
[#<TracePoint:c_return `trace'@tp_test.rb:1>, TracePoint, main]
[#<TracePoint:c_call `enable'@tp_test.rb:5>, #<TracePoint:c_call `enable'@tp_test.rb:5>, main]
[#<TracePoint:c_return `enable'@tp_test.rb:5>, #<TracePoint:c_return `enable'@tp_test.rb:5>, main]
[#<TracePoint:c_return `enable'@tp_test.rb:5>, #<TracePoint:c_return `enable'@tp_test.rb:5>, main]
[#<TracePoint:c_call `times'@tp_test.rb:7>, 1, main]
[#<TracePoint:c_call `times'@tp_test.rb:7>, 1, main]
[#<TracePoint:c_return `times'@tp_test.rb:7>, 1, main]
[#<TracePoint:c_return `times'@tp_test.rb:7>, 1, main]
self of `times' method is `1'. However, binding.eval('self') returns main. This means that binding is also used Ruby level.
This is limitation of current TracePoint.
What should be happen on such case?
----------------------------------------
Bug #7976: TracePoint call is at call point, not call site
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/7976#change-42410
Author: zenspider (Ryan Davis)
Status: Feedback
Priority: Normal
Assignee: ko1 (Koichi Sasada)
Category: core
Target version: current: 2.1.0
ruby -v: 2.0
Backport:
Using TracePoint to make a new tracer utility I'm finding it very difficult to actually trace where the origin is for type :call. Instead, I get the destination. This is not the case for :c_call or :b_call as they trace at the origin, not destination.
Reproduction attached. Notice how it outputs ":call wtf.rb:08 :x" where line 8 is the definition of x, not the call of x, yet the subsequent backtrace lists line 21 which is the original origin for the call to x.
--
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/