[#83096] File.setuid? on IO (Re: [ruby-cvs:67289] normal:r60108 (trunk): file.c: release GVL in File.{setuid?, setgid?, sticky?}) — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
On 2017/10/04 8:47, normal@ruby-lang.org wrote:
5 messages
2017/10/04
[#83100] Re: File.setuid? on IO (Re: [ruby-cvs:67289] normal:r60108 (trunk): file.c: release GVL in File.{setuid?, setgid?, sticky?})
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2017/10/04
Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#83105] Re: File.setuid? on IO (Re: [ruby-cvs:67289] normal:r60108 (trunk): file.c: release GVL in File.{setuid?, setgid?, sticky?})
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2017/10/04
On 2017/10/04 15:55, Eric Wong wrote:
[#83107] Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes? — Alberto Almagro <albertoalmagro@...>
Hello,
9 messages
2017/10/04
[#83113] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— "Urabe, Shyouhei" <shyouhei@...>
2017/10/05
This has been requested countless times, then rejected each and every time.
[#83129] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— Alberto Almagro <albertoalmagro@...>
2017/10/05
Sorry I didn't found it on the core mail list's archive.
[#83138] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— "Urabe, Shyouhei" <shyouhei@...>
2017/10/06
Ruby has not been made of popular votes so far. You have to show us
[#83149] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2017/10/06
Alberto Almagro <albertoalmagro@gmail.com> wrote:
[#83200] [Ruby trunk Feature#13996] [PATCH] file.c: apply2files releases GVL — normalperson@...
Issue #13996 has been reported by normalperson (Eric Wong).
4 messages
2017/10/10
[ruby-core:83475] [Ruby trunk Bug#7968] Poor UDPSocket#send performance in ruby 2.0.0 on windows
From:
usa@...
Date:
2017-10-21 16:18:55 UTC
List:
ruby-core #83475
Issue #7968 has been updated by usa (Usaku NAKAMURA). Assignee changed from usa (Usaku NAKAMURA) to cruby-windows ---------------------------------------- Bug #7968: Poor UDPSocket#send performance in ruby 2.0.0 on windows https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/7968#change-67475 * Author: cs96and (Alan Davies) * Status: Assigned * Priority: Normal * Assignee: cruby-windows * Target version: * ruby -v: ruby 2.0.0p0 (2013-02-24) [x64-mingw32] * Backport: ---------------------------------------- I have noticed that the performance of UDPSocket#send on ruby 2.0.0 on windows is much poorer than that of 1.9.3 or 1.8.7. Running the attahced script on 2.0.0 gives the following... d:\scripts>bash -c "ruby --version" ruby 2.0.0p0 (2013-02-24) [x64-mingw32] d:\scripts>bash -c "time ruby socketsendtest.rb" real 0m2.572s user 0m0.000s sys 0m0.016s However, running the same test with 1.9.3 is much faster... d:\scripts>pik 193 d:\scripts>bash -c "ruby --version" ruby 1.9.3p374 (2013-01-15) [i386-mingw32] d:\scripts>bash -c "time ruby socketsendtest.rb" real 0m0.993s user 0m0.015s sys 0m0.016s Additionally, if I change the send call to a print (commented out in the script), then the performance is fine on 2.0.0.... d:\scripts>pik 200 d:\scripts>bash -c "ruby --version" ruby 2.0.0p0 (2013-02-24) [x64-mingw32] d:\scripts>bash -c "time ruby socketsendtest.rb" real 0m0.907s user 0m0.000s sys 0m0.015s What is send() doing that print() doesn't do that is causing the massive performance drop? Thanks Alan. ---Files-------------------------------- socketsendtest.rb (266 Bytes) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>