[#41916] Proposal: Bitmap Marking GC — Narihiro Nakamura <authornari@...>

Hi.

18 messages 2012/01/05

[#41941] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5851][Open] make check fails when compiling with GCC 4.7 - *** longjmp causes uninitialized stack frame *** — Vit Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>

12 messages 2012/01/06

[#41979] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5865][Open] Exception#== should return false if the classes differ — Hiro Asari <asari.ruby@...>

10 messages 2012/01/08

[#42003] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5871][Open] regexp \W matches some word characters when inside a case-insensitive character class — Gareth Adams <gareth@...>

14 messages 2012/01/09

[#42016] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5873][Open] Adopt FFI over DL — Heesob Park <phasis@...>

15 messages 2012/01/10

[#42149] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5899][Open] chaining comparsions. — Ondrej Bilka <neleai@...>

12 messages 2012/01/16

[#42164] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5903][Open] Optimize st_table (take 2) — Yura Sokolov <funny.falcon@...>

18 messages 2012/01/17

[ruby-core:42201] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5915] Array#join with explicit nil should not use $,

From: John Firebaugh <john.firebaugh@...>
Date: 2012-01-21 04:35:51 UTC
List: ruby-core #42201
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 8:19 PM, Yui NARUSE <naruse@airemix.jp> wrote:
> nil is not "", so there is no such documentation.

I don't understand your point.

To quote from array.c:

/*
 *  call-seq:
 *     ary.join(sep=$,)    -> str
 *
 *  Returns a string created by converting each element of the array to
 *  a string, separated by +sep+.
 *
 *     [ "a", "b", "c" ].join        #=> "abc"
 *     [ "a", "b", "c" ].join("-")   #=> "a-b-c"
 */

Clearly $, is documented as being the default. If that is not the
desired behavior, the documentation should be changed. I would
suggest:

/*
 *  call-seq:
 *     ary.join(sep=nil)    -> str
 *
 *  Returns a string created by converting each element of the array to
 *  a string, separated by +sep+. If +sep+ is nil, $, is used instead.
 *
 *     [ "a", "b", "c" ].join        #=> "abc"
 *     [ "a", "b", "c" ].join("-")   #=> "a-b-c"
 */

But I would prefer it to work as currently documented, because that
behavior is (slightly) less complex in that it doesn't require
explicitly specifying that "If +sep+ is nil, $, is used instead."

In This Thread