[#46049] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6590] Dealing with bigdecimal, etc gems in JRuby — "mrkn (Kenta Murata)" <muraken@...>
[#46078] [ruby-trunk - Feature #2565] adding hooks for better tracing — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...>
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 03:06:59AM +0900, mame (Yusuke Endoh) wrote:
[#46127] [ruby-trunk - Feature #2565] adding hooks for better tracing — "vo.x (Vit Ondruch)" <v.ondruch@...>
[#46160] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6693][Open] Don't warn for unused variables starting with _ — "marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune)" <ruby-core@...>
[#46163] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6695][Open] Configuration for Thread/Fiber creation — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>
[#46172] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6697][Open] [PATCH] Add Kernel#Symbol conversion method like String(), Array() etc. — "madeofcode (Mark Dodwell)" <mark@...>
[#46236] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6704][Open] Random core dump — "trans (Thomas Sawyer)" <transfire@...>
[#46248] building ruby-1.9.3-p194 on AIX 6.1 TL05 SP06 — Perry Smith <pedzsan@...>
I am just now starting to debug this but hoped someone has already =
Hi Perry
Hi Perry,
[#46262] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6710][Open] new special binding specifier :isolated — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>
[#46276] Lambdaification of Method Calls — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...>
Hi,
[#46320] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6721][Open] Object#yield_self — "alexeymuranov (Alexey Muranov)" <redmine@...>
[#46339] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6724][Open] waaaaaaant! ( — "zenspider (Ryan Davis)" <redmine@...>
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 08:58:36AM +0900, zenspider (Ryan Davis) wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Aaron Patterson
[#46377] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6727][Open] Add Array#rest (with implementation) — "duckinator (Nick Markwell)" <nick@...>
[#46420] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6731][Open] add new method "Object.present?" as a counter to #empty? — "rogerdpack (Roger Pack)" <rogerpack2005@...>
[#46500] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6739][Open] One-line rescue statement should support specifying an exception class — Quintus (Marvin Gülker) <sutniuq@...>
[#46535] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6749][Open] rdoc of Time class (incorrect explanation of leap seconds) — "stomar (Marcus Stollsteimer)" <redmine@...>
Hi Eric,
On Jul 23, 2012, at 11:52 PM, sto.mar@web.de wrote:
Am 24.07.2012 19:44, schrieb Eric Hodel:
[#46546] Fwd: [ruby-cvs:43609] ko1:r36433 (trunk): * thread.c (rb_thread_call_without_gvl2): added. — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#46553] [ruby-trunk - Feature #2565] adding hooks for better tracing — "tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson)" <aaron@...>
[#46564] Ruby under CI - Windows — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
Hello,
[#46574] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6762][Open] Control interrupt timing — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>
"ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
I was suggesting "interruptible" as a better alternative for
[#46577] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6763][Open] Introduce Flonum technique to speedup floating computation on th 64bit environment — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>
[#46586] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6764][Open] IO#read(size, buf) causes can't set length of shared string in trunk (2.0.0dev) — "nahi (Hiroshi Nakamura)" <nakahiro@...>
[#46641] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6780][Open] cannot compile zlib module, when cross-compiling. — "jinleileiking (lei king)" <jinleileiking@...>
[#46686] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6784][Open] Test failures related to numeric with x64 mingw — "h.shirosaki (Hiroshi Shirosaki)" <h.shirosaki@...>
[#46741] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6789][Open] parse.y compilation error due not updated id.h — "luislavena (Luis Lavena)" <luislavena@...>
[#46744] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6791][Open] ext/js on/generator/generator.c fails to compile on nightly build (AIX 6.1) — "pedz (Perry Smith)" <pedz@...>
Hi Perry,
[#46772] Ruby 1.9.3 release? — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
JRuby will soon release 1.7.0pre2, the second preview of 1.7. Perhaps
(2012/07/26 7:07), Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 10:59 PM, NARUSE, Yui <naruse@airemix.jp> wrote:
[#46792] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6799][Open] Digest::*.hexdigest returns an ASCII-8BIT String — "Eregon (Benoit Daloze)" <redmine@...>
[#46832] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6807][Open] Can't compile ruby without ruby — "devcurmudgeon (Paul Sherwood)" <storitel@...>
[#46834] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6808][Open] Implicit index for enumerations — "trans (Thomas Sawyer)" <transfire@...>
[#46838] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6810][Open] `module A::B; end` is not equivalent to `module A; module B; end; end` with respect to constant lookup (scope) — "alexeymuranov (Alexey Muranov)" <redmine@...>
[#46854] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6811][Open] File, Dir and FileUtils should have bang-versions of singleton methods that fails silently — "prijutme4ty (Ilya Vorontsov)" <prijutme4ty@...>
[#46896] (Half-baked DRAFT) new `require' framework — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
2012/7/31 SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net>
On 31/07/12 13:29, SASADA Koichi wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Alex Young <alex@blackkettle.org> wrote:
On 01/08/2012, at 5:59 AM, Trans wrote:
(2012/07/31 21:29), SASADA Koichi wrote:
If one is considering importing archive files like zip, tar, jar, or gem, I
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Rocky Bernstein <rockyb@rubyforge.org> wrote:
[ruby-core:46076] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5922] Migrate equal? to identical?
Issue #5922 has been updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh). Received, thank you! -- Yusuke Endoh <mame@tsg.ne.jp> ---------------------------------------- Feature #5922: Migrate equal? to identical? https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/5922#change-27683 Author: trans (Thomas Sawyer) Status: Assigned Priority: Normal Assignee: matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto) Category: Target version: 2.0.0 From Ruby docs: "the equal? method should never be overridden by subclasses: it is used to determine object identity (that is, a.equal?(b) iff a is the same object as b)." I think it would make more sense to name such a method `#identical?`, since that is what it is doing --*comparing identity*. Over a sufficient period of time the current use of `#equal?` can be deprecated and possibly made better use of with a different definition. I realize this is not a minor change. This transition would probably be much like the one from #id to #object_id. The reason I propose this, and why it is an issue for myself, is in of the design of assertion frameworks. For example, #assert_equal is a comparison of #==, not #equal?. We run into this naming conundrum and end up having to use assertion names that don't correspond well to the names of the underlying comparison. So that's the practical reason. But formally speaking, I think #identical? also better b/c it is more precise. -- http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/