[#290] — Florian Frank <flori@...>
Hi all,
5 messages
2002/08/03
[#297] GC longjmp macros — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...>
Hi,
5 messages
2002/08/05
[#308] Q: OSSL in std. distr? — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...>
Hi,
4 messages
2002/08/08
[#326] Implications of a #force_free method in Object? — Matthew Bloch <mattbee@...>
Hello;
8 messages
2002/08/19
[#328] Int vs Long — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...>
Hi,
7 messages
2002/08/21
[#337] Int vs Long (2nd part) — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...>
Hi,
7 messages
2002/08/22
[#340] Int vs Long #3 — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...>
Hi,
9 messages
2002/08/22
[#344] Re: [Cleanup] Int vs Long #3
— nobu.nokada@...
2002/08/22
Hi,
[#348] Re: [Cleanup] Int vs Long #3
— Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...>
2002/08/23
Hello,
[#353] File (struct stat handling) — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...>
Hello,
6 messages
2002/08/23
[#358] node.h for eval.c — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...>
Hi,
5 messages
2002/08/23
[#372] rb_class_path — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...>
Hello,
7 messages
2002/08/27
[#382] Port match to new dup, clone framework — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...>
Hi,
5 messages
2002/08/28
[#393] in dln.c — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...>
Hi,
14 messages
2002/08/30
[#398] Re: [MemLeak] in dln.c
— nobu.nokada@...
2002/08/31
Hi,
[#403] Re: [MemLeak] in dln.c
— Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...>
2002/09/02
Hello,
Re: Mswin32 build flags
From:
"U.Nakamura" <usa@...>
Date:
2002-08-16 07:12:43 UTC
List:
ruby-core #325
Hello,
In message "Mswin32 build flags"
on Aug.16,2002 15:52:41, <chr_news@gmx.net> wrote:
| Unfortunately these builds also miserably fail the basic
| ``nmake test'', however by only turning off the /Og
| flag turning the compilation of the file ``sprint.c''
| one seems to get an executable which seem to enjoy
| the speed gain of a full /Og optimization which
| passes the basic "nmake test" (true at least for
| VC 7) - so I am wondering if there are known issues
| against such a compilation strategy?
Because there are more problems with /Og flag
(GC, Regexp, etc).
So, I cannot say that /Og is reliable.
Regards,
--
U.Nakamura <usa@osb.att.ne.jp>