From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2002-09-04T01:12:08+09:00
Subject: Re: [MemLeak] in dln.c

Hi,

In message "Re: [MemLeak] in dln.c"
    on 02/09/03, Michal Rokos <m.rokos@sh.cvut.cz> writes:

|On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 11:04:50AM +0900, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
|> Ruby uses missing/alloca.c for such platforms, however I've
|> inclined to #1, which uses alloca() in just two places.  Still
|> ASTRDUP() macro feels evil, so explicit copy may be better.
|
|	personally, I'd go for #3, than #1, and then #2.
|
|	If #3 is NO-NO, I'd take #1. If matz is not agains, I'll leave
|	implementation, and commit of #1 to you.

Since I want dln.c to be separatable, I prefer #2, #1, then #3.

							matz.