ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)

[#574] doc/NEWS maintainer wanted — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>

Hi guys,

1 message 2002/11/11

[#575] warning messages in 1.7.3 — "Rich Kilmer" <rich@...>

Is is possible to only print the first occurance of a warning of a

2 messages 2002/11/13

[#576] Re: warning messages in 1.7.3 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu.nokada@...> 2002/11/13

Hi,

[#577] partition_by — Florian Frank <flori@...>

Hi!

6 messages 2002/11/16

[#583] Re: partition_by — "Guy N. Hurst" <gnhurst@...> 2002/11/23

Florian Frank wrote:

[#578] Re: partition_by — Anders Bengtsson <ndrsbngtssn@...> 2002/11/16

Florian Frank wrote:

[#579] Re: partition_by — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/11/16

Hi,

[#581] Re: partition_by — Florian Frank <flori@...> 2002/11/18

On 2002-11-17 02:25:10 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#580] Re: partition_by — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2002/11/16

At Sun, 17 Nov 2002 02:25:10 +0900,

Re: io_write()/fwrite() and EINTR on Solaris

From: nobu.nokada@...

Date: 2002-11-07 04:43:03 UTC

List: ruby-core #566

Hi,

At Wed, 6 Nov 2002 13:50:08 +0900,
Jos Backus wrote:
> Meanwhile I intend to use the following patch (against today's HEAD).  An
> earlier version saved the original mask, blocked SIGVTALRM, called fwrite(),
> then restored the original mask, but this seems to be safe enough.  Can
> anybody see anything wrong with it?

Well, your patch makes thread switch impossible while writing
to non-blocking IO, doesn't it?  I suspect it's an acceptable
restriction, however, cannot decide it.

-- 
Nobu Nakada

Thread

In This Thread