[#444] io_write()/fwrite() and EINTR on Solaris — Jos Backus <jos@...>

I am encountering a problem similar to the one mentioned here,

19 messages 2002/09/06
[#453] Re: io_write()/fwrite() and EINTR on Solaris — nobu.nokada@... 2002/09/08

Hi,

[#454] Re: io_write()/fwrite() and EINTR on Solaris — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/09/09

Hi

[#469] Re: io_write()/fwrite() and EINTR on Solaris — Jos Backus <jos@...> 2002/09/09

On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 03:55:13PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#479] Re: io_write()/fwrite() and EINTR on Solaris — Jos Backus <jos@...> 2002/09/10

On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 01:04:10AM +0900, Jos Backus wrote:

[#492] Re: io_write()/fwrite() and EINTR on Solaris — Jos Backus <jos@...> 2002/09/21

On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 02:23:33AM +0900, Jos Backus wrote:

Re: [CVS] Fix rb_digest_base_become

From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2002-09-05 02:10:51 UTC
List: ruby-core #434
Hi,

In message "Re: [CVS] Fix rb_digest_base_become"
    on 02/09/05, "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@iDaemons.org> writes:

|I'm the one who wrote this module, but I'm just not sure if it was me
|who wrote this particular function.  The patch seems ok, but the line
|'if (copy = obj) return copy;' looks very odd.  Shouldn't the = be ==?

I did.  All blame should be mine.  And yes, = should be ==.

							matz.

In This Thread

Prev Next