[#444] io_write()/fwrite() and EINTR on Solaris — Jos Backus <jos@...>

I am encountering a problem similar to the one mentioned here,

19 messages 2002/09/06
[#453] Re: io_write()/fwrite() and EINTR on Solaris — nobu.nokada@... 2002/09/08

Hi,

[#454] Re: io_write()/fwrite() and EINTR on Solaris — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/09/09

Hi

[#469] Re: io_write()/fwrite() and EINTR on Solaris — Jos Backus <jos@...> 2002/09/09

On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 03:55:13PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#479] Re: io_write()/fwrite() and EINTR on Solaris — Jos Backus <jos@...> 2002/09/10

On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 01:04:10AM +0900, Jos Backus wrote:

[#492] Re: io_write()/fwrite() and EINTR on Solaris — Jos Backus <jos@...> 2002/09/21

On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 02:23:33AM +0900, Jos Backus wrote:

Re: Patch to add a Module#const_missing method

From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2002-09-21 09:47:38 UTC
List: ruby-core #494
Hi,

In message "Re: Patch to add a Module#const_missing method"
    on 02/09/21, GOTO Kentaro <gotoken@notwork.org> writes:

|  module M
|    class<<self
|      def const_missing(a) a end
|      def method_missing(*a) a end
|    end
|  end 
|  p M::M
|
|In this case, what should be printed?
|
|  (1) :M   by const_missing()
|  (2) [:M] by method_missing()
|  (3) M    by the rule M == M::M

No (2), because M::M cannot be a method call.
Perhaps (3).

							matz.

In This Thread

Prev Next