[#444] io_write()/fwrite() and EINTR on Solaris — Jos Backus <jos@...>

I am encountering a problem similar to the one mentioned here,

19 messages 2002/09/06
[#453] Re: io_write()/fwrite() and EINTR on Solaris — nobu.nokada@... 2002/09/08

Hi,

[#454] Re: io_write()/fwrite() and EINTR on Solaris — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/09/09

Hi

[#469] Re: io_write()/fwrite() and EINTR on Solaris — Jos Backus <jos@...> 2002/09/09

On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 03:55:13PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#479] Re: io_write()/fwrite() and EINTR on Solaris — Jos Backus <jos@...> 2002/09/10

On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 01:04:10AM +0900, Jos Backus wrote:

[#492] Re: io_write()/fwrite() and EINTR on Solaris — Jos Backus <jos@...> 2002/09/21

On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 02:23:33AM +0900, Jos Backus wrote:

Re: Patch to add a Module#const_missing method

From: Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
Date: 2002-09-06 16:53:57 UTC
List: ruby-core #452
matz@ruby-lang.org (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:

> |proxy classes for Java classes. I guess there must be some similar uses
> |for it in C-Ruby too, for creating proxy classes?
> 
> Understood.  How about more general aproach like "attr_missing" or
> something to hook both instance variables and constants?  Of course,
> there may be a better name.
> 

I wonder if there's any reasonable case where you'd want a single
method to be able to handle both missing instance variables and
missing constants? The two seem pretty disjoint, so perhaps they
should use different hooks.


Cheers



Dave

In This Thread