[#444] io_write()/fwrite() and EINTR on Solaris — Jos Backus <jos@...>

I am encountering a problem similar to the one mentioned here,

19 messages 2002/09/06
[#453] Re: io_write()/fwrite() and EINTR on Solaris — nobu.nokada@... 2002/09/08

Hi,

[#454] Re: io_write()/fwrite() and EINTR on Solaris — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/09/09

Hi

[#469] Re: io_write()/fwrite() and EINTR on Solaris — Jos Backus <jos@...> 2002/09/09

On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 03:55:13PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#479] Re: io_write()/fwrite() and EINTR on Solaris — Jos Backus <jos@...> 2002/09/10

On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 01:04:10AM +0900, Jos Backus wrote:

[#492] Re: io_write()/fwrite() and EINTR on Solaris — Jos Backus <jos@...> 2002/09/21

On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 02:23:33AM +0900, Jos Backus wrote:

Re: Patch to add a Module#const_missing method

From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2002-09-06 01:23:50 UTC
List: ruby-core #443
Hi,

In message "Patch to add a Module#const_missing method"
    on 02/09/06, Jan Arne Petersen <JanArne.Petersen@t-online.de> writes:

|I wrote a patch to add a Module#const_missing method like the 
|Object#method_missing method to Ruby.

Thank you for the patch.  But we have to discuss whether we need this
hook.  Hook is sometimes useful but since we can not add every
possible hook, we have to draw line somewhere.  Opinion, everyone?

							matz.

In This Thread