[#444] io_write()/fwrite() and EINTR on Solaris — Jos Backus <jos@...>

I am encountering a problem similar to the one mentioned here,

19 messages 2002/09/06
[#453] Re: io_write()/fwrite() and EINTR on Solaris — nobu.nokada@... 2002/09/08

Hi,

[#454] Re: io_write()/fwrite() and EINTR on Solaris — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/09/09

Hi

[#469] Re: io_write()/fwrite() and EINTR on Solaris — Jos Backus <jos@...> 2002/09/09

On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 03:55:13PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#479] Re: io_write()/fwrite() and EINTR on Solaris — Jos Backus <jos@...> 2002/09/10

On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 01:04:10AM +0900, Jos Backus wrote:

[#492] Re: io_write()/fwrite() and EINTR on Solaris — Jos Backus <jos@...> 2002/09/21

On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 02:23:33AM +0900, Jos Backus wrote:

Re: Patch to add a Module#const_missing method

From: nobu.nokada@...
Date: 2002-09-06 11:17:58 UTC
List: ruby-core #446
Hi,

At Fri, 6 Sep 2002 10:23:50 +0900,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> |I wrote a patch to add a Module#const_missing method like the 
> |Object#method_missing method to Ruby.
> 
> Thank you for the patch.  But we have to discuss whether we need this
> hook.  Hook is sometimes useful but since we can not add every
> possible hook, we have to draw line somewhere.  Opinion, everyone?

Already we have autoload, and it can be considered a special
form of const_missing, I guess.

-- 
Nobu Nakada

In This Thread