ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)

[#290] — Florian Frank <flori@...>

Hi all,

5 messages 2002/08/03

[#293] reply for your message — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/08/03

Hi,

[#305] File::Stat#blksize etc. should return nil instead of 0 — Florian Frank <flori@...> 2002/08/07

On Sun, 2002-08-04 at 01:45, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#306] Re: File::Stat#blksize etc. should return nil instead of 0 — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/08/07

Hi,

[#307] RE: reply for your message — "Rich Kilmer" <rich@...> 2002/08/07

[#291] Kernel Thread implementation — Matthew Bloch <mattbee@...>

Hi there; after struggling for a little while against the unpredictability of

4 messages 2002/08/03

[#292] Re: Kernel Thread implementation — ts <decoux@...> 2002/08/03

>>>>> "M" == Matthew Bloch <mattbee@soup-kitchen.net> writes:

[#421] Allocate crash loop hole. — "Christoph" <chr_news@...> 2002/09/03

Hi,

[#424] RE: Allocate crash loop hole. — "Christoph" <chr_news@...> 2002/09/04

I wrote

[#297] GC longjmp macros — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...>

Hi,

5 messages 2002/08/05

[#300] Re: [Cleanup] GC longjmp macros — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/08/06

Hi,

[#301] Re: [Cleanup] GC longjmp macros — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...> 2002/08/06

On Tue, Aug 06, 2002 at 03:49:38PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#302] Re: [Cleanup] GC longjmp macros — nobu.nokada@... 2002/08/06

At Tue, 6 Aug 2002 16:58:53 +0900,

[#303] Re: [Cleanup] GC longjmp macros — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...> 2002/08/06

Hi,

[#298] Is there a bug in Matrix or Complex? — Jim Freeze <jim@...>

Hi:

2 messages 2002/08/05

[#299] Re: Is there a bug in Matrix or Complex? — GOTO Kentaro <gotoken@...> 2002/08/05

At Tue, 6 Aug 2002 01:53:09 +0900,

[#308] Q: OSSL in std. distr? — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...>

Hi,

4 messages 2002/08/08

[#310] Re: Q: OSSL in std. distr? — ts <decoux@...> 2002/08/09

>>>>> "M" == Michal Rokos <m.rokos@sh.cvut.cz> writes:

[#311] Re: Q: OSSL in std. distr? — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...> 2002/08/09

Hi,

[#312] Re: Q: OSSL in std. distr? — "James F.Hranicky" <jfh@...> 2002/08/09

On Fri, 9 Aug 2002 17:56:24 +0900

[#309] Progress on incremental GC? — "Timothy J. Wood" <tjw@...>

1 message 2002/08/08

[#314] resolv.rb on 1.6.7 — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

1 message 2002/08/09

[#316] Embeding Ruby in C++ code. — Kostas Katsamakas <kmak@...>

I have written the following code:

2 messages 2002/08/10

[#317] Re: Embeding Ruby in C++ code. — nobu.nokada@... 2002/08/11

Hi,

[#318] C and Ruby... — Kostas Katsamakas <kmak@...>

How can i add an instance variable in a ruby class object?

2 messages 2002/08/11

[#319] Re: C and Ruby... — nobu.nokada@... 2002/08/11

Hi,

[#321] Ruby module, Warn(ing) interface — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2002/08/12

[#322] Re: [ToDo] Ruby module, Warn(ing) interface — nobu.nokada@... 2002/08/12

Hi,

[#326] Implications of a #force_free method in Object? — Matthew Bloch <mattbee@...>

Hello;

8 messages 2002/08/19

[#327] Re: Implications of a #force_free method in Object? — nobu.nokada@... 2002/08/19

Hi,

[#423] Set.rb patch — "Christoph" <chr_news@...> 2002/09/03

Hi,

[#425] Re: Set.rb patch — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/09/04

Hi,

[#426] Re: Set.rb patch — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2002/09/04

Hello,

[#427] Re: Set.rb patch — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2002/09/04

At Wed, 4 Sep 2002 12:44:40 +0900,

[#431] RE: Set.rb patch — "Christoph" <chr_news@...> 2002/09/04

Akinori MUSHA wrote ...

[#430] RE: Set.rb patch — "Christoph" <chr_news@...> 2002/09/04

[#328] Int vs Long — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...>

Hi,

7 messages 2002/08/21

[#333] Re: [Cleanup?] Int vs Long — Ryan Davis <ryand@...> 2002/08/21

Is any work being done to speed up certain aspects of ruby? I was

[#336] Re: [Cleanup?] Int vs Long — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/08/22

[#334] optimizing efforts? — Ryan Davis <ryand@...> 2002/08/21

yeah... i'm a dope. I need more coffee today. Resent w/ a real subject.

[#332] Re: [Cleanup?] Int vs Long — "James F.Hranicky" <jfh@...> 2002/08/21

On Wed, 21 Aug 2002 20:30:44 +0900

[#335] Re: [Cleanup?] Int vs Long — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...> 2002/08/22

Hi,

[#388] Native Threads (was Re: [Cleanup?] Int vs Long) — "James F.Hranicky" <jfh@...> 2002/08/28

On Thu, 22 Aug 2002 19:06:15 +0900

[#329] Int vs Long #2 — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...>

Hi,

3 messages 2002/08/21

[#330] Re: [Cleanup?] Int vs Long #2 — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/08/21

Hi,

[#331] Re: [Cleanup?] Int vs Long #2 — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...> 2002/08/21

Hello,

[#337] Int vs Long (2nd part) — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...>

Hi,

7 messages 2002/08/22

[#338] Re: [Cleanup] Int vs Long (2nd part) — nobu.nokada@... 2002/08/22

Hi,

[#339] Re: [Cleanup] Int vs Long (2nd part) — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...> 2002/08/22

Hi,

[#341] Re: [Cleanup] Int vs Long (2nd part) — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...> 2002/08/22

Hi,

[#343] Re: [Cleanup] Int vs Long (2nd part) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/08/22

Hi,

[#342] Re: [Cleanup] Int vs Long (2nd part) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/08/22

Hi,

[#347] Re: [Cleanup] Int vs Long (2nd part) — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...> 2002/08/23

Hello,

[#340] Int vs Long #3 — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...>

Hi,

9 messages 2002/08/22

[#344] Re: [Cleanup] Int vs Long #3 — nobu.nokada@... 2002/08/22

Hi,

[#348] Re: [Cleanup] Int vs Long #3 — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...> 2002/08/23

Hello,

[#350] Re: [Cleanup] Int vs Long #3 — nobu.nokada@... 2002/08/23

Hi,

[#351] Re: [Cleanup] Int vs Long #3 — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...> 2002/08/23

Hello,

[#352] Re: [Cleanup] Int vs Long #3 (RESEND with -p) — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...> 2002/08/23

On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 07:41:22PM +0900, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#371] Re: [Cleanup] Int vs Long #3 (RESEND with -p) — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...> 2002/08/27

Hello,

[#374] Re: [Cleanup] Int vs Long #3 (RESEND with -p) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/08/27

Hi,

[#377] Re: [Cleanup] Int vs Long #3 (RESEND with -p) — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...> 2002/08/28

Hello,

[#345] Bug in gc.c or misunderstanding on my part? — "Timothy J. Wood" <tjw@...>

2 messages 2002/08/23

[#346] RE: Bug in gc.c or misunderstanding on my part? — "Christian Boos" <cboos@...> 2002/08/23

Hi,

[#349] Array#select — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...>

Hi,

3 messages 2002/08/23

[#354] Re: [Optim] Array#select — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/08/23

Hi,

[#357] Re: [Optim] Array#select — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...> 2002/08/23

Hello,

[#353] File (struct stat handling) — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...>

Hello,

6 messages 2002/08/23

[#356] Re: [Cleanup?] File (struct stat handling) — nobu.nokada@... 2002/08/23

Hi,

[#359] Re: [Cleanup?] File (struct stat handling) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/08/24

Hi,

[#370] Re: [Cleanup?] File (struct stat handling) — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...> 2002/08/27

Hello,

[#375] Re: [Cleanup?] File (struct stat handling) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/08/27

Hi,

[#379] Re: [Cleanup?] File (struct stat handling) — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...> 2002/08/28

Hello,

[#355] Array and .ALLOC. changes — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...>

Hi,

3 messages 2002/08/23

[#360] Re: [Useless] Array and .*ALLOC.* changes — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/08/24

Hi,

[#368] Re: [Useless] Array and .*ALLOC.* changes — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...> 2002/08/27

Hello,

[#358] node.h for eval.c — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...>

Hi,

5 messages 2002/08/23

[#361] Re: [-Wall] node.h for eval.c — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/08/24

Hi,

[#369] Re: [-Wall] node.h for eval.c — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...> 2002/08/27

Hello,

[#362] Re: [-Wall] node.h for eval.c — nobu.nokada@... 2002/08/24

Hi,

[#365] Re: [-Wall] node.h for eval.c — Ryan Davis <ryand@...> 2002/08/25

I just spent an LAX to SEA plane trip cleaning all but two warnings for

[#363] Ruby embedding limitations — "Timothy J. Wood" <tjw@...>

3 messages 2002/08/24

[#364] Re: Ruby embedding limitations — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2002/08/24

Timothy J. Wood wrote:

[#366] Re: Ruby embedding limitations — Ryan Davis <ryand@...> 2002/08/25

[#367] RE: Welcome to our (ruby-core ML) You are added automatically — Girish Sharangpani <girishs@...>

Hi,

1 message 2002/08/26

[#372] rb_class_path — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...>

Hello,

7 messages 2002/08/27

[#373] Re: [Safer] rb_class_path — nobu.nokada@... 2002/08/27

Hi,

[#378] Re: [Safer] rb_class_path — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...> 2002/08/28

Hello,

[#380] Re: [Safer] rb_class_path — nobu.nokada@... 2002/08/28

Hi,

[#381] Re: [Safer] rb_class_path — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...> 2002/08/28

Hello,

[#383] Re: [Safer] rb_class_path — nobu.nokada@... 2002/08/28

Hi,

[#384] Re: [Safer] rb_class_path — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...> 2002/08/28

Hello,

[#376] Virtual host and port number in CGI — Raymond Blum <raymond@...>

Hi

1 message 2002/08/28

[#382] Port match to new dup, clone framework — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...>

Hi,

5 messages 2002/08/28

[#385] Re: [Update] Port match to new dup, clone framework — nobu.nokada@... 2002/08/28

Hi,

[#386] Re: [Update] Port match to new dup, clone framework — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...> 2002/08/28

Hello,

[#389] Re: [Update] Port match to new dup, clone framework — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/08/28

Hi,

[#391] Re: [Update] Port match to new dup, clone framework — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...> 2002/08/30

Hello,

[#387] rb_str_replace — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2002/08/28

[#390] Re: [Clenup?] rb_str_replace — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/08/28

Hi,

[#392] io.c read_all — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...>

Hello,

1 message 2002/08/30

[#393] in dln.c — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...>

Hi,

14 messages 2002/08/30

[#398] Re: [MemLeak] in dln.c — nobu.nokada@... 2002/08/31

Hi,

[#403] Re: [MemLeak] in dln.c — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...> 2002/09/02

Hello,

[#404] Re: [MemLeak] in dln.c — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/09/02

Hi,

[#405] Re: [MemLeak] in dln.c — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...> 2002/09/02

Hello,

[#406] Re: [MemLeak] in dln.c — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/09/03

Hi,

[#435] Re: [MemLeak] in dln.c — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...> 2002/09/05

Hello,

[#407] Re: [MemLeak] in dln.c — nobu.nokada@... 2002/09/03

Hi,

[#411] Re: [MemLeak] in dln.c — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...> 2002/09/03

Hi,

[#418] Re: [MemLeak] in dln.c — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/09/03

Hi,

[#409] Re: [MemLeak] in dln.c — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...> 2002/09/03

Hello,

[#408] Re: [MemLeak] in dln.c — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...> 2002/09/03

Hi Michal,

[#402] Re: [MemLeak] in dln.c — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...> 2002/09/02

Hi,

[#397] Re: [MemLeak] in dln.c — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/08/30

Hi,

[#394] in file.c — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...>

Hi,

3 messages 2002/08/30

[#396] Re: [MemLeak] in file.c — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/08/30

Hi,

[#401] Re: [MemLeak] in file.c — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...> 2002/09/02

Hi,

[#395] CVS version and win32 naming — "Rich Kilmer" <rich@...>

Having just checked out the latest from CVS, the version bumped to

3 messages 2002/08/30

[#399] Re: CVS version and win32 naming — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/08/31

Hi,

[#400] RE: CVS version and win32 naming — "Rich Kilmer" <rich@...> 2002/08/31

> -----Original Message-----

Re: Q: OSSL in std. distr?

From: Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...>

Date: 2002-08-09 08:56:24 UTC

List: ruby-core #311

Hi,

On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 05:11:55PM +0900, ts wrote:
>  Personnaly I think that it's not a good idea to put beta version in the
>  standard distribution.

	The status is little vierd. The parts that are in OSSL are
	stable, but there is a lot things to add.

	Basically you're right - It's not a good idea to add OSSL into
	std.distr ever. (Because nobody seems to be using it.) (If it
	would be there, there will be dep. on OpenSSL and we can drop
	Digest module and gain some more 'crypto' classes.)

		Michal

-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Michal Rokos                         Czech Technical University, Prague
E-mail:m.rokos@sh.cvut.cz      ICQ:36118339      Jabber:majkl@jabber.cz
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Thread

In This Thread