From: Christoph <chr_news@...>
Date: 2002-08-01T15:39:31+09:00
Subject: RE: A truth? patch  + benchmarks



> -----Original Message-----
> From: ts [mailto:decoux@moulon.inra.fr]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 5:04 PM
> To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org
> Cc: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org
> Subject: Re: A truth? patch + benchmarks
> 
> >>>>> "C" == Christoph  <chr_news@gmx.net> writes:
> 
> C> I also cooked up simple minded an implementation. It is based on
> C> a FL_FALSE flag (I defined it to be 1<<5 not sure if this can
> C> case any problem?) similar to the frozen or tainted flags - that
> C> is I added there methods (the method names ain't great ..)
> 
>  Not really sure but the values < 64 reserved for T_MASK
> 
> #define T_NIL    0x01
> #define T_OBJECT 0x02
> [etc]
> #define T_NODE   0x3f
> 
> #define T_MASK   0x3f

Hm, what about using FL_USER7? More generally, is there any 
unused flag left?


/Christoph