ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)
2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

[#17031] enc/trans/japanese.c — "Giancarlo F Bellido" <support@...>

Line 13334 of enc/trans/japanese.c. struct to_SHIFT_JIS_EF_infos[7] has an

2 messages 2008/06/01
[#17032] Re: enc/trans/japanese.c — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2008/06/01

Hi,

[#17034] Improve Class.allocate documentation — Gaston Ramos <ramos.gaston@...>

Hi Core,

3 messages 2008/06/01
[#17035] Re: [PATH] Improve Class.allocate documentation — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/06/02

Hi,
[#17039] Re: [PATH] Improve Class.allocate documentation — Gaston Ramos <ramos.gaston@...> 2008/06/02

El lun, 02 de jun de 2008, a las 09:23:25 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto dijo:

[#17036] Problem with NUM2INT — Sylvain HENRY <hsyl20@...>

Hi,=0A=0AI started writing my own extension for Ruby in C and I encountered=

3 messages 2008/06/02
[#17048] Re: Problem with NUM2INT — ts <decoux@...> 2008/06/02

Sylvain HENRY wrote:
[#17041] Re: Problem with NUM2INT — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/06/02

Hi,

[#17037] Re : Problem with NUM2INT — Sylvain HENRY <hsyl20@...>

FYI, I just tried with 1.8.7 and got the same result.=0A=0ARegards,=0ASylva=

1 message 2008/06/02

[#17045] Ruby 1.8.7: DelegateClass#respond_to? missing second argument — "Jeremy Kemper" <jeremy@...>

ruby -v -rdelegate -e 'class Foo < DelegateClass(String); end;

2 messages 2008/06/02
[#17047] Re: Ruby 1.8.7: DelegateClass#respond_to? missing second argument — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2008/06/02

At Mon, 2 Jun 2008 16:07:50 +0900,

[#17049] Re : Problem with NUM2INT — Sylvain HENRY <hsyl20@...>

Hi,=0A=0AI corrected warnings given by GCC (especially I had to use rb_num2=

2 messages 2008/06/02
[#17050] Re: Re : Problem with NUM2INT — ts <decoux@...> 2008/06/02

Sylvain HENRY wrote:

[#17051] Re : Problem with NUM2INT — Sylvain HENRY <hsyl20@...>

Thanks! It's strange but if I write:=0A#include <ruby.h>=0A#include <ffmpeg=

1 message 2008/06/02

[#17052] (Open) [DOC] Typo in enumerator.c (Enumerator.new) — redmine@...

Issue #26 has been reported by Arnaud MEURET.

1 message 2008/06/02

[#17055] Set#map! vs. map — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>

Hi --

23 messages 2008/06/03
[#17056] Re: Set#map! vs. map — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/06/03

Hi,
[#17062] Re: Set#map! vs. map — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/06/03

Hi --
[#17063] Re: Set#map! vs. map — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/06/03

Hi,
[#17065] Re: Set#map! vs. map — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/06/03

Hi --
[#17068] Re: Set#map! vs. map — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2008/06/03

On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 4:33 AM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
[#17077] Re: Set#map! vs. map — "Martin DeMello" <martindemello@...> 2008/06/03

On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 9:19 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#17057] Re: Set#map! vs. map — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2008/06/03

At Tue, 3 Jun 2008 10:13:07 +0900,
[#17060] Re: Set#map! vs. map — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2008/06/03

At Tue, 3 Jun 2008 13:39:10 +0900,
[#17066] Re: Set#map! vs. map — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/06/03

Hi --
[#17071] Re: Set#map! vs. map — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2008/06/03

At Tue, 3 Jun 2008 18:03:23 +0900,
[#17072] Re: Set#map! vs. map — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2008/06/03

[#17074] Re: Set#map! vs. map — "ara.t.howard" <ara.t.howard@...> 2008/06/03

[#17076] Re: Set#map! vs. map — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2008/06/03

Gary Wright wrote:
[#17078] Re: Set#map! vs. map — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/06/03

Hi --
[#17081] Re: Set#map! vs. map — "Martin DeMello" <martindemello@...> 2008/06/03

On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 10:50 AM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
[#17082] Re: Set#map! vs. map — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/06/03

Hi --
[#17083] Re: Set#map! vs. map — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/06/03

I agree with those who have said that Set.map should return an array as
[#17086] Re: Set#map! vs. map — Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@...> 2008/06/03

On Jun 3, 2008, at 1:50 PM, David A. Black wrote:
[#17080] Re: Set#map! vs. map — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/06/03

Hi --
[#17058] Re: Set#map! vs. map — "ara.t.howard" <ara.t.howard@...> 2008/06/03

[#17064] Re: Set#map! vs. map — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/06/03

Hi --
[#17059] Re: Set#map! vs. map — Matthew Boeh <mboeh@...> 2008/06/03

On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 10:13:07AM +0900, David A. Black wrote:

[#17061] [DOC] Typo in enumerator.c (Enumerator.new) — redmine@...

Issue #26 has been updated by Akinori MUSHA.

1 message 2008/06/03

[#17067] Eval'ing 'yield' in 1.8 and 1.9 — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...>

Hi,

6 messages 2008/06/03
[#17070] Re: Eval'ing 'yield' in 1.8 and 1.9 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/06/03

Hi,
[#17075] Re: Eval'ing 'yield' in 1.8 and 1.9 — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...> 2008/06/03

Hi,
[#17079] Re: Eval'ing 'yield' in 1.8 and 1.9 — Jeremy Henty <onepoint@...> 2008/06/03

On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 01:29:05AM +0900, Vladimir Sizikov wrote:
[#17089] Re: Eval'ing 'yield' in 1.8 and 1.9 — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...> 2008/06/03

Hi Jeremy,
[#17105] Re: Eval'ing 'yield' in 1.8 and 1.9 — Jeremy Henty <onepoint@...> 2008/06/04

[#17069] Ruby on zLinux — "Eric K. Dickinson" <eric.dickinson@...>

I posted this on the Ruby-Talk list with no success.

5 messages 2008/06/03
[#17091] Re: Ruby on zLinux — "Roger Pack" <rogerpack2005@...> 2008/06/04

I've had some luck with installing the mysql binary from source
[#17099] Re: Ruby on zLinux — "Eric K. Dickinson" <eric.dickinson@...> 2008/06/04

Roger Pack wrote:
[#17104] Re: Ruby on zLinux — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/06/04

Eric K. Dickinson wrote:
[#17112] Re: Ruby on zLinux — "Eric K. Dickinson" <eric.dickinson@...> 2008/06/04

I'm sorry. I thought this is where one would

[#17073] Improve Class.allocate documentation — Gaston Ramos <ramos.gaston@...>

Hi Core,

2 messages 2008/06/03
[#17096] Re: [PATH] Improve Class.allocate documentation — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/06/04

Hi,

[#17084] Enumerable::Enumerator#with_memo — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>

Hi,

36 messages 2008/06/03
[#17085] Re: Enumerable::Enumerator#with_memo — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/06/03

Akinori MUSHA wrote:
[#17087] Re: Enumerable::Enumerator#with_memo — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/06/03

David Flanagan wrote:
[#17095] Re: Enumerable::Enumerator#with_memo — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2008/06/04

At Wed, 4 Jun 2008 03:38:48 +0900,
[#17100] Re: Enumerable::Enumerator#with_memo — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2008/06/04

On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 4:16 AM, Akinori MUSHA <knu@idaemons.org> wrote:
[#17102] Re: Enumerable::Enumerator#with_memo — "Meinrad Recheis" <meinrad.recheis@...> 2008/06/04

On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Akinori MUSHA <knu@idaemons.org> wrote:
[#17103] Re: Enumerable::Enumerator#with_memo — "Meinrad Recheis" <meinrad.recheis@...> 2008/06/04

On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Meinrad Recheis <meinrad.recheis@gmail.com>
[#17107] Re: Enumerable::Enumerator#with_memo — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/06/04

Akinori MUSHA wrote:
[#17088] Re: Enumerable::Enumerator#with_memo — Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...> 2008/06/03

If the method does what it sounds like (returns a new enumerator that
[#17168] Re: Enumerable::Enumerator#with_memo — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/06/09

Akinori MUSHA wrote:
[#17173] Re: Enumerable::Enumerator#with_memo — "Jeremy Kemper" <jeremy@...> 2008/06/10

On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 12:11 PM, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:
[#17192] Re: Enumerable::Enumerator#with_memo — "Martin DeMello" <martindemello@...> 2008/06/10

On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 10:57 PM, Jeremy Kemper <jeremy@bitsweat.net> wrote:
[#17193] Re: Enumerable::Enumerator#with_memo — "Jean-Fran輟is Tr穗" <jftran@...> 2008/06/10

2008/6/10 Martin DeMello :
[#17194] Re: Enumerable::Enumerator#with_memo — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/06/10

Martin DeMello wrote:
[#17195] Re: Enumerable::Enumerator#with_memo — "Martin DeMello" <martindemello@...> 2008/06/10

On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:04 AM, David Flanagan
[#17197] Re: Enumerable::Enumerator#with_memo — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/06/10

Martin DeMello wrote:
[#17201] Re: Enumerable::Enumerator#with_memo — "Martin DeMello" <martindemello@...> 2008/06/10

On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:44 AM, David Flanagan
[#17202] Re: Enumerable::Enumerator#with_memo — "Meinrad Recheis" <meinrad.recheis@...> 2008/06/10

On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:42 PM, Martin DeMello <martindemello@gmail.com>
[#17196] Re: Enumerable::Enumerator#with_memo — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/06/10

David Flanagan wrote:
[#17210] Re: Enumerable::Enumerator#with_memo — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/06/11

Hi --
[#17225] Re: Enumerable::Enumerator#with_memo — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/06/11

David A. Black wrote:
[#17230] Re: Enumerable::Enumerator#with_memo — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/06/12

Hi --
[#17233] Re: Enumerable::Enumerator#with_memo — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2008/06/12

On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 2:52 AM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
[#17236] Re: Enumerable::Enumerator#with_memo — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/06/12

Hi --
[#17174] Re: Enumerable::Enumerator#with_memo — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2008/06/10

At Tue, 10 Jun 2008 04:11:38 +0900,
[#17176] Re: Enumerable::Enumerator#with_memo — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/06/10

Hi --
[#17191] Re: Enumerable::Enumerator#with_memo — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/06/10

David A. Black wrote:
[#17223] Re: Enumerable::Enumerator#with_memo — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2008/06/11

On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 12:22 PM, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com>
[#17224] Re: Enumerable::Enumerator#with_memo — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/06/11

Hi --
[#17184] Re: Enumerable::Enumerator#with_memo — "Meinrad Recheis" <meinrad.recheis@...> 2008/06/10

On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 8:28 PM, Akinori MUSHA <knu@idaemons.org> wrote:
[#17238] Re: Enumerable::Enumerator#with_memo — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2008/06/13

Thank you all for your voices!
[#17239] Re: Enumerable::Enumerator#with_memo — "Meinrad Recheis" <meinrad.recheis@...> 2008/06/13

On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 5:28 PM, Akinori MUSHA <knu@idaemons.org> wrote:
[#17240] Re: Enumerable::Enumerator#with_memo — "Jeremy Kemper" <jeremy@...> 2008/06/13

On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Akinori MUSHA <knu@idaemons.org> wrote:
[#17241] Re: Enumerable::Enumerator#with_memo — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/06/13

Hi --
[#17242] Re: Enumerable::Enumerator#with_memo — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/06/13

Akinori MUSHA wrote:
[#17264] Re: Enumerable::Enumerator#with_memo — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2008/06/16

At Sat, 14 Jun 2008 04:49:39 +0900,

[#17090] — Sylvain HENRY <hsyl20@...>

unsubscribe=0A=0A=0A__________________________________________________=0ADo=

1 message 2008/06/03

[#17092] Iconv#iconv(str, start, length) doesn't really convert str[start, length] — Vincent <vincentlu@...>

Hi Core,

8 messages 2008/06/04
[#17093] Re: [PATCH] Iconv#iconv(str, start, length) doesn't really convert str[start, length] — Vincent <vincentlu@...> 2008/06/04

Hi Core,
[#17094] Re: [PATCH] Iconv#iconv(str, start, length) doesn't really convert str[start, length] — Vincent <vincentlu@...> 2008/06/04

Hi,
[#17097] Re: [PATCH] Iconv#iconv(str, start, length) doesn't really convert str[start, length] — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...> 2008/06/04

Hi,
[#17101] Re: [PATCH] Iconv#iconv(str, start, length) doesn't really convert str[start, length] — "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...> 2008/06/04

Vladimir Sizikov wrote:
[#17115] Re: [PATCH] Iconv#iconv(str, start, length) doesn't really convert str[start, length] — Vincent <vincentlu@...> 2008/06/04

Hi,
[#17118] Re: [PATCH] Iconv#iconv(str, start, length) doesn't really convert str[start, length] — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...> 2008/06/05

Hi,
[#17127] Re: [PATCH] Iconv#iconv(str, start, length) doesn't really convert str[start, length] — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/06/06

Hi,

[#17098] — "Jet Ju" <jetbillwin@...>

unsubscribe

1 message 2008/06/04

[#17106] r16747: This commit and comment are real? — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...>

Checking a feed of the changes in ruby repository found this:

4 messages 2008/06/04
[#17108] Re: r16747: This commit and comment are real? — "Jano Svitok" <jan.svitok@...> 2008/06/04

On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 7:21 PM, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:
[#17109] Re: r16747: This commit and comment are real? — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...> 2008/06/04

On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Jano Svitok <jan.svitok@gmail.com> wrote:
[#17110] Re: r16747: This commit and comment are real? — "Jano Svitok" <jan.svitok@...> 2008/06/04

On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 7:35 PM, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:

[#17111] changed command order in inf-ruby.el — "Eric Schulte" <schulte.eric@...>

Hi,

3 messages 2008/06/04
[#17114] Re: changed command order in inf-ruby.el — Josh Schairbaum <mailing-lists@...> 2008/06/04

It's not completely dedicated to Ruby and Emacs, but it mostly is.
[#17211] Re: changed command order in inf-ruby.el — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/06/11

Hi,

[#17116] Standardizing RUBY_PLATFORM — Brian Ford <brixen@...>

Hi all,

6 messages 2008/06/05
[#17117] Re: Standardizing RUBY_PLATFORM — Brian Ford <brixen@...> 2008/06/05

On Jun 4, 8:52=A0pm, Brian Ford <bri...@gmail.com> wrote:
[#17139] Re: Standardizing RUBY_PLATFORM — ruby-ml <ruby-ml@...> 2008/06/07

RFC.
[#17140] Re: Standardizing RUBY_PLATFORM — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/06/07

Hello, I believe I'm the only one who actually touches RUBY_PATCHLEVEL.
[#17141] Re: Standardizing RUBY_PLATFORM — "Wilson Bilkovich" <wilsonb@...> 2008/06/08

On 6/7/08, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#17142] Re: Standardizing RUBY_PLATFORM — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2008/06/08

In article <d4e4955b0806080838n7dafb119y2d4d2ce20668fcd4@mail.gmail.com>,

[#17126] remove ObjectSpace.each_object from test/unit — Tanaka Akira <akr@...>

I wrote a patch to remove ObjectSpace.each_object from test/unit.

6 messages 2008/06/06
[#17128] Re: remove ObjectSpace.each_object from test/unit — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2008/06/06

> -----Original Message-----
[#17130] Re: remove ObjectSpace.each_object from test/unit — Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...> 2008/06/06

Berger, Daniel wrote:
[#17131] Re: remove ObjectSpace.each_object from test/unit — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/06/06

Hi,
[#17137] Re: remove ObjectSpace.each_object from test/unit — Kurt Stephens <ks@...> 2008/06/07

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#17138] Re: remove ObjectSpace.each_object from test/unit — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2008/06/07

In article <484A5243.705@kurtstephens.com>,

[#17129] ruby-vendor-dir-configure-in.patch — "Richard Brown" <rbrown@...>

Hi, please accept this patch to configure.in that makes the default

1 message 2008/06/06

[#17134] IRHG - Chapter 11 -- Is there a way to visualize the parse/scanner operation — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

Core,

1 message 2008/06/06

[#17135] IRHG -- Scanner Output — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

Core,

1 message 2008/06/06

[#17136] Net/http urlencode — "Giancarlo F Bellido" <support@...>

Line 1524 ( function urlencode ) doesn't work anymore in ruby trunk.

1 message 2008/06/07

[#17144] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #115] (Open) SortedSet#delete_if does not yield in sorted order — Arthur Schreiber <redmine@...>

Issue #115 has been reported by Arthur Schreiber.

3 messages 2008/06/08
[#17148] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #115] SortedSet#delete_if does not yield in sorted order — Arthur Schreiber <redmine@...> 2008/06/08

Issue #115 has been updated by Arthur Schreiber.
[#17150] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #115] (Closed) SortedSet#delete_if does not yield in sorted order — Arthur Schreiber <redmine@...> 2008/06/09

Issue #115 has been updated by Akinori MUSHA.

[#17145] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #117] (Open) SortedSet#flatten_merge and SortedSet#flatten can't actually flatten nested SortedSets — Arthur Schreiber <redmine@...>

Issue #117 has been reported by Arthur Schreiber.

5 messages 2008/06/08
[#17151] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #117] SortedSet#flatten_merge and SortedSet#flatten can't actually flatten nested SortedSets — Arthur Schreiber <redmine@...> 2008/06/09

Issue #117 has been updated by Akinori MUSHA.
[#17198] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #117] SortedSet#flatten_merge and SortedSet#flatten can't actually flatten nested SortedSets — Arthur Schreiber <redmine@...> 2008/06/10

Issue #117 has been updated by Arthur Schreiber.
[#23353] [Bug #117](Closed) SortedSet#flatten_merge and SortedSet#flatten can't actually flatten nested SortedSets — Akinori MUSHA <redmine@...> 2009/05/04

Issue #117 has been updated by Akinori MUSHA.
[#23348] [Bug #117] SortedSet#flatten_merge and SortedSet#flatten can't actually flatten nested SortedSets — "ujihisa ." <redmine@...> 2009/05/02

Issue #117 has been updated by ujihisa ..

[#17146] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #118] (Open) SortedSet#inspect does not work with nested SortedSets — Arthur Schreiber <redmine@...>

Issue #118 has been reported by Arthur Schreiber.

7 messages 2008/06/08
[#23344] [Bug #118](Closed) SortedSet#inspect does not work with nested SortedSets — Akinori MUSHA <redmine@...> 2009/05/01

Issue #118 has been updated by Akinori MUSHA.
[#17152] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #118] SortedSet#inspect does not work with nested SortedSets — Arthur Schreiber <redmine@...> 2008/06/09

Issue #118 has been updated by Akinori MUSHA.
[#17183] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #118] SortedSet#inspect does not work with nested SortedSets — Arthur Schreiber <redmine@...> 2008/06/10

Issue #118 has been updated by Arthur Schreiber.
[#17181] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #118] SortedSet#inspect does not work with nested SortedSets — Arthur Schreiber <redmine@...> 2008/06/10

Issue #118 has been updated by Arthur Schreiber.
[#17182] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #118] SortedSet#inspect does not work with nested SortedSets — Arthur Schreiber <redmine@...> 2008/06/10

Issue #118 has been updated by Akinori MUSHA.
[#17187] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #118] SortedSet#inspect does not work with nested SortedSets — Arthur Schreiber <redmine@...> 2008/06/10

Issue #118 has been updated by Arthur Schreiber.

[#17147] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #119] (Open) Set#divide and SortedSet#divide raise NoMethodErrors when passed no block — Arthur Schreiber <redmine@...>

Issue #119 has been reported by Arthur Schreiber.

3 messages 2008/06/08
[#17153] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #119] Set#divide and SortedSet#divide raise NoMethodErrors when passed no block — Arthur Schreiber <redmine@...> 2008/06/09

Issue #119 has been updated by Akinori MUSHA.
[#21942] [Bug #119](Closed) Set#divide and SortedSet#divide raise NoMethodErrors when passed no block — Akinori MUSHA <redmine@...> 2009/02/09

Issue #119 has been updated by Akinori MUSHA.

[#17149] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #120] (Open) --enable-gc-malloc-stats — Jeremy Kemper <redmine@...>

Issue #120 has been reported by Jeremy Kemper.

4 messages 2008/06/08
[#24527] [Feature #120] --enable-gc-malloc-stats — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/07/23

Issue #120 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#30805] [Feature #120] --enable-gc-malloc-stats — Jeremy Kemper <redmine@...> 2010/06/18

Issue #120 has been updated by Jeremy Kemper.
[#30833] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #120] (Open) --enable-gc-malloc-stats — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2010/06/20

Hi,

[#17154] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #124] (Open) Module#remove_method broken in 1.8.6-p166 — Arthur Schreiber <redmine@...>

Issue #124 has been reported by Arthur Schreiber.

3 messages 2008/06/09
[#17160] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #124] Module#remove_method broken in 1.8.6-p166 — Arthur Schreiber <redmine@...> 2008/06/09

Issue #124 has been updated by Vladimir Sizikov.
[#17691] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #124] (Closed) Module#remove_method broken in 1.8.6-p166 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2008/07/09

Issue #124 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#17155] lambda { break } — ts <decoux@...>

8 messages 2008/06/09
[#17156] Re: lambda { break } — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2008/06/09

Hi,
[#17157] Re: lambda { break } — ts <decoux@...> 2008/06/09

SASADA Koichi wrote:
[#17158] Re: lambda { break } — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2008/06/09

Hi,
[#17164] Re: lambda { break } — ts <decoux@...> 2008/06/09

SASADA Koichi wrote:
[#17306] Re: lambda { break } — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2008/06/17

Hi,
[#17321] Re: lambda { break } — ts <decoux@...> 2008/06/18

SASADA Koichi wrote:
[#17323] Re: lambda { break } — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2008/06/18

> SASADA Koichi wrote:

[#17159] KNOWNBUGS.rb — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>

Hi,

1 message 2008/06/09

[#17161] Ruby 1.8.7-p17 has been released — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>

Folks,

4 messages 2008/06/09
[#17163] Re: Ruby 1.8.7-p17 has been released — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2008/06/09

Oops,
[#17165] Re: Ruby 1.8.7-p17 has been released — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2008/06/09

For those who already have ruby-1.8.7 downloaded, I put a patch also:
[#17166] Re: Ruby 1.8.7-p17 has been released — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2008/06/09

> -----Original Message-----

[#17162] Release Plan: Ruby 1.9.0-2 — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>

Hi,

44 messages 2008/06/09
[#17254] Re: Release Plan: Ruby 1.9.0-2 — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2008/06/15

Hi,
[#17256] Re: Release Plan: Ruby 1.9.0-2 — ts <decoux@...> 2008/06/15

SASADA Koichi wrote:
[#17258] Re: Release Plan: Ruby 1.9.0-2 — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2008/06/15

ts wrote:
[#17273] Re: Release Plan: Ruby 1.9.0-2 — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2008/06/16

[#17275] Re: Release Plan: Ruby 1.9.0-2 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/06/16

Hi,
[#17276] Re: Release Plan: Ruby 1.9.0-2 — Kouhei Sutou <kou@...> 2008/06/16

Hi,
[#17302] Re: Release Plan: Ruby 1.9.0-2 — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2008/06/17

I propose to hold comit miniunit. It seems that we need more
[#17314] Re: Release Plan: Ruby 1.9.0-2 — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2008/06/18

[#17325] Re: Release Plan: Ruby 1.9.0-2 — James Gray <james@...> 2008/06/18

On Jun 17, 2008, at 11:38 PM, Ryan Davis wrote:
[#17312] Re: Release Plan: Ruby 1.9.0-2 — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2008/06/18

[#17346] Re: Release Plan: Ruby 1.9.0-2 — Kouhei Sutou <kou@...> 2008/06/19

Hi,
[#17347] Re: Release Plan: Ruby 1.9.0-2 — Phil Hagelberg <phil@...> 2008/06/19

Kouhei Sutou <kou@cozmixng.org> writes:
[#17350] Re: Release Plan: Ruby 1.9.0-2 — "Jeremy Kemper" <jeremy@...> 2008/06/19

On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 9:31 AM, Phil Hagelberg <phil@hagelb.org> wrote:
[#17351] Re: Release Plan: Ruby 1.9.0-2 — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2008/06/19

Jeremy Kemper wrote:
[#17390] Re: Release Plan: Ruby 1.9.0-2 — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2008/06/24

[#17397] Re: Release Plan: Ruby 1.9.0-2 — Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@...> 2008/06/24

[#17389] Re: Release Plan: Ruby 1.9.0-2 — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2008/06/24

[#17753] Re: Release Plan: Ruby 1.9.0-2 — Kouhei Sutou <kou@...> 2008/07/13

Hi,
[#17756] Re: Release Plan: Ruby 1.9.0-2 — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/07/13

On Jul 12, 2008, at 18:59 PM, Kouhei Sutou wrote:
[#17831] Re: Release Plan: Ruby 1.9.0-2 — Kouhei Sutou <kou@...> 2008/07/18

Hi,
[#17832] Re: Release Plan: Ruby 1.9.0-2 — James Gray <james@...> 2008/07/18

On Jul 18, 2008, at 6:53 AM, Kouhei Sutou wrote:
[#17987] Re: Release Plan: Ruby 1.9.0-2 — "Leonard Chin" <l.g.chin@...> 2008/07/26

Although it sounds very promising, is miniunit really a drop-in replacement?
[#17763] Re: Release Plan: Ruby 1.9.0-2 — Trans <transfire@...> 2008/07/14

Hi--
[#17758] Re: Release Plan: Ruby 1.9.0-2 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/07/14

Hi,
[#17769] Re: Release Plan: Ruby 1.9.0-2 — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2008/07/14

[#17784] Re: Release Plan: Ruby 1.9.0-2 — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2008/07/15

I have to agree, on the documentation side.
[#17789] Re: Release Plan: Ruby 1.9.0-2 — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/07/15

On Jul 15, 2008, at 01:30 AM, Martin Duerst wrote:
[#17796] Re: Release Plan: Ruby 1.9.0-2 — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2008/07/16

At 02:48 08/07/16, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#17798] Re: Release Plan: Ruby 1.9.0-2 — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2008/07/16

[#17803] Re: Release Plan: Ruby 1.9.0-2 — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2008/07/16

At 12:04 08/07/16, Ryan Davis wrote:
[#17804] Re: Release Plan: Ruby 1.9.0-2 — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2008/07/16

[#17259] Re: Release Plan: Ruby 1.9.0-2 — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/06/15

On Jun 9, 2008, at 06:20 AM, SASADA Koichi wrote:
[#17337] Re: Release Plan: Ruby 1.9.0-2 — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2008/06/19

SASADA Koichi wrote:
[#17339] Re: Release Plan: Ruby 1.9.0-2 — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2008/06/19

SASADA Koichi wrote:
[#17340] Re: Release Plan: Ruby 1.9.0-2 — ts <decoux@...> 2008/06/19

SASADA Koichi wrote:
[#17359] Re: Release Plan: Ruby 1.9.0-2 — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...> 2008/06/21

[#17360] Re: Release Plan: Ruby 1.9.0-2 — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2008/06/21

Hello,
[#17341] Re: Release Plan: Ruby 1.9.0-2 — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...> 2008/06/19

[#17358] Re: Release Plan: Ruby 1.9.0-2 — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2008/06/21

Hello,
[#17361] Re: Release Plan: Ruby 1.9.0-2 — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...> 2008/06/21

Hi,
[#17363] Re: Release Plan: Ruby 1.9.0-2 — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...> 2008/06/21

[#17342] Re: Release Plan: Ruby 1.9.0-2 — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...> 2008/06/19

[#17343] Re: Release Plan: Ruby 1.9.0-2 — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...> 2008/06/19

[#17167] Mail count in Subject — "Dirk Traulsen" <dirk.traulsen@...>

Hi!

20 messages 2008/06/09
[#17169] Re: Mail count in Subject — "Warren Brown" <warrenb@...> 2008/06/09

All,
[#17171] Re: Mail count in Subject — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/06/10

Warren Brown wrote:
[#17172] Re: Mail count in Subject — "Dirk Traulsen" <dirk.traulsen@...> 2008/06/10

Am 10 Jun 2008 um 11:54 hat Urabe Shyouhei geschrieben:
[#17175] Re: Mail count in Subject — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2008/06/10

At 11:54 08/06/10, Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
[#17177] Re: Mail count in Subject — Marc Haisenko <haisenko@...> 2008/06/10

On Tuesday 10 June 2008, Martin Duerst wrote:
[#17178] Re: Mail count in Subject — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/06/10

Hi,
[#17207] Re: Mail count in Subject — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2008/06/11

Hello Matz,
[#17209] Re: Mail count in Subject — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/06/11

Hi,
[#17219] Re: Mail count in Subject — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2008/06/11

At Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:57:38 +0900,
[#17179] Re: Mail count in Subject — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/06/10

Hello Martin,
[#17180] Re: Mail count in Subject — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/06/10

Oops,
[#17185] Re: Mail count in Subject — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...> 2008/06/10

On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 4:54 AM, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#17206] Re: Mail count in Subject — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/06/11

Luis Lavena wrote:
[#17208] Re: Mail count in Subject — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2008/06/11

At 12:03 08/06/11, Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
[#17212] Re: Mail count in Subject — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/06/11

Martin Duerst wrote:
[#17214] Re: Mail count in Subject — "Meinrad Recheis" <meinrad.recheis@...> 2008/06/11

On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 12:14 PM, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org>
[#17213] Re: Mail count in Subject — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...> 2008/06/11

On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 5:03 AM, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#17216] Re: Mail count in Subject — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/06/11

Luis Lavena wrote:
[#17218] Re: Mail count in Subject — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...> 2008/06/11

On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#17170] changed command order in inf-ruby.el — "Eric Schulte" <schulte.eric@...>

Just to follow up,

1 message 2008/06/10

[#17186] REXML Separation — Federico Builes <federico.builes@...>

Hello,

7 messages 2008/06/10
[#17188] Re: REXML Separation — Sam Ruby <rubys@...> 2008/06/10

Federico Builes wrote:
[#17189] Re: REXML Separation — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2008/06/10

(Sam, I also address your response at the bottom of this email)
[#17190] Re: REXML Separation — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2008/06/10

[#17217] Re: REXML Separation — Trans <transfire@...> 2008/06/11

[#17215] Re: REXML Separation — Sam Ruby <rubys@...> 2008/06/11

Sean E. Russell wrote:
[#17222] Re: REXML Separation — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2008/06/11

On Wednesday 11 June 2008, Sam Ruby wrote:

[#17200] miniunit to replace test/unit in 1.9(?) — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

Koichi asked me to double-check with Matz and ruby-core that it is OK

1 message 2008/06/10

[#17203] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #140] [PATCH] Set#== performance improvement — Arthur Schreiber <redmine@...>

Issue #140 has been updated by Arthur Schreiber.

2 messages 2008/06/11
[#25563] [Bug #140](Closed) [PATCH] Set#== performance improvement — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/09/14

Issue #140 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.

[#17204] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #140] (Open) [PATCH] Set#== performance improvement — Arthur Schreiber <redmine@...>

Issue #140 has been reported by Arthur Schreiber.

1 message 2008/06/11

[#17220] VM::InstructionSequence to_a->load->to_a != to_a — Adam Strzelecki <ono@...>

Hello,

2 messages 2008/06/11
[#17221] Re: VM::InstructionSequence to_a->load->to_a != to_a — Adam Strzelecki <ono@...> 2008/06/11

Sorry for posting again, but actually patch attached to my previous

[#17226] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #141] (Open) Rational#power2 loops when the argument is 0 — Gianluigi Spagnuolo <redmine@...>

Issue #141 has been reported by Gianluigi Spagnuolo.

2 messages 2008/06/11
[#17229] Re: [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #141] (Open) Rational#power2 loops when the argument is 0 — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/06/12

Gianluigi Spagnuolo wrote:

[#17228] Regex name functions — Guillermo <guillermo@...>

U29ycnkgaWYgdGhlc2UgaXMgbm90IHRoZSBwZXJmZWN0IHBsYWNlIHRvIHBvc3QgdGhlc2UuCgpJ

3 messages 2008/06/11
[#17252] Re: Regex name functions — Adam Strzelecki <ono@...> 2008/06/15

> I think it could be interesting a regex named functions because it
[#17263] Re: Regex name functions — "Joseph Holsten" <joseph@...> 2008/06/16

Adam Strzelecki wrote:

[#17232] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #143] (Open) rdoc and magic comment — Anonymous <redmine@...>

Issue #143 has been reported by Anonymous.

2 messages 2008/06/12
[#17930] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #143] (Closed) rdoc and magic comment — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2008/07/23

Issue #143 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#17234] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #146] (Open) Incorrect line numbers in "caller" output when evaluated in a Proc binding — Wilson Bilkovich <redmine@...>

Issue #146 has been reported by Wilson Bilkovich.

4 messages 2008/06/12
[#18412] [Bug #146] Incorrect line numbers in "caller" output when evaluated in a Proc binding — Wilson Bilkovich <redmine@...> 2008/08/28

Issue #146 has been updated by Wilson Bilkovich.
[#24205] [Bug #146] Incorrect line numbers in "caller" output when evaluated in a Proc binding — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...> 2009/07/08

Issue #146 has been updated by Run Paint Run Run.
[#25593] [Bug #146] Incorrect line numbers in "caller" output when evaluated in a Proc binding — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/09/14

Issue #146 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.

[#17237] IRHG -- Parse.y/c Information or documentation needed! — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

Core,

1 message 2008/06/12

[#17243] [Patch] Support 'canonical' option in Marshal.dump — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net>

Currently Marshal.dump stores Hash entries in no specific order. This

4 messages 2008/06/14
[#17244] Re: [Patch] Support 'canonical' option in Marshal.dump — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net> 2008/06/14

Hongli Lai wrote:
[#17246] Re: [Patch] Support 'canonical' option in Marshal.dump — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/06/14

Hi,
[#17247] Re: [Patch] Support 'canonical' option in Marshal.dump — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net> 2008/06/14

Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:

[#17245] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #156] (Open) [PATCH] StringIO#sysread(0) raises a EOFError — Arthur Schreiber <redmine@...>

Issue #156 has been reported by Arthur Schreiber.

2 messages 2008/06/14
[#17253] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #156] (Closed) [PATCH] StringIO#sysread(0) raises a EOFError — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...> 2008/06/15

Issue #156 has been updated by Yuki Sonoda.

[#17248] IRHG - Figure translation request! — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

Can someone translate to notes on this figure.

4 messages 2008/06/14
[#17249] Re: IRHG - Figure translation request! — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2008/06/14

Hi,
[#17250] Re: IRHG - Figure translation request! — Hirotsugu Asari <asari.ruby@...> 2008/06/14

[#17251] Re: IRHG - Figure translation request! — Charles Thornton <ceo@...> 2008/06/14

Thank you both:

[#17255] Re: Maintenance for Ruby 1.8.5 series to be officially dropped soon — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>

Hi core,

1 message 2008/06/15

[#17257] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #159] (Open) [PATCH] StringIO#readline does not set $_ — Arthur Schreiber <redmine@...>

Issue #159 has been reported by Arthur Schreiber.

2 messages 2008/06/15
[#17260] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #159] (Closed) [PATCH] StringIO#readline does not set $_ — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2008/06/15

Issue #159 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#17261] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #161] (Open) Profile library seems broken in 1.9 15427cat t.rv — Dave Thomas <redmine@...>

Issue #161 has been reported by Dave Thomas.

8 messages 2008/06/15
[#17262] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #161] Profile library seems broken in 1.9 15427cat t.rv — Dave Thomas <redmine@...> 2008/06/15

Issue #161 has been updated by Dave Thomas.
[#17265] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #161] (Open) Profile library seems broken in 1.9 15427cat t.rv — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2008/06/16

This is a limitation (incompatible feature) on 1.9.
[#17266] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #161] Profile library seems broken in 1.9 15427cat t.rv — Dave Thomas <redmine@...> 2008/06/16

Issue #161 has been updated by Dave Thomas.
[#17268] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #161] Profile library seems broken in 1.9 15427cat t.rv — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2008/06/16

Hi,
[#17269] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #161] Profile library seems broken in 1.9 15427cat t.rv — Dave Thomas <redmine@...> 2008/06/16

Issue #161 has been updated by Dave Thomas.
[#17271] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #161] Profile library seems broken in 1.9 15427cat t.rv — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2008/06/16

Hi,
[#17923] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #161] Profile library seems broken in 1.9 15427cat t.rv — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2008/07/22

Issue #161 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#17267] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #162] (Open) The thwait standard library fails to comp;ile under 1.9 — Dave Thomas <redmine@...>

Issue #162 has been reported by Dave Thomas.

2 messages 2008/06/16
[#17274] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #162] (Closed) The thwait standard library fails to comp;ile under 1.9 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2008/06/16

Issue #162 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#17270] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #166] (Open) Signal handling and sleep() don't work together — Dave Thomas <redmine@...>

Issue #166 has been reported by Dave Thomas.

2 messages 2008/06/16
[#17698] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #166] (Closed) Signal handling and sleep() don't work together — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2008/07/09

Issue #166 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#17272] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #167] (Open) net/telnet login() method no longer works under 1.9 — Dave Thomas <redmine@...>

Issue #167 has been reported by Dave Thomas.

6 messages 2008/06/16
[#17285] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #167] (Open) net/telnet login() method no longer works under 1.9 — James Gray <james@...> 2008/06/16

On Jun 15, 2008, at 11:25 PM, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#17286] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #167] (Open) net/telnet login() method no longer works under 1.9 — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/06/17

Yes, indeed it does...
[#17300] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #167] (Open) net/telnet login() method no longer works under 1.9 — James Gray <james@...> 2008/06/17

On Jun 16, 2008, at 9:13 PM, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#17301] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #167] (Open) net/telnet login() method no longer works under 1.9 — James Gray <james@...> 2008/06/17

On Jun 17, 2008, at 9:06 AM, James Gray wrote:
[#17299] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #167] (Closed) net/telnet login() method no longer works under 1.9 — Anonymous <redmine@...> 2008/06/17

Issue #167 has been updated by Anonymous.

[#17277] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #171] (Open) StringIO#each and StringIO#readlines does change $_, IO#each and IO#readlines do not — Arthur Schreiber <redmine@...>

Issue #171 has been reported by Arthur Schreiber.

2 messages 2008/06/16
[#17278] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #171] (Closed) StringIO#each and StringIO#readlines does change $_, IO#each and IO#readlines do not — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2008/06/16

Issue #171 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#17279] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #172] (Open) Regular expressions should inherit encoding of context even if they only contain 7-bit chars — Dave Thomas <redmine@...>

Issue #172 has been reported by Dave Thomas.

2 messages 2008/06/16
[#17607] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #172] (Closed) Regular expressions should inherit encoding of context even if they only contain 7-bit chars — Anonymous <redmine@...> 2008/07/04

Issue #172 has been updated by Anonymous.

[#17280] ruby download page confusion — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...>

3 messages 2008/06/16
[#17284] Re: ruby download page confusion — James Gray <james@...> 2008/06/16

On Jun 16, 2008, at 1:08 PM, Joel VanderWerf wrote:
[#17281] Re: ruby download page confusion — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2008/06/16

=20

[#17282] 'make install' installs files that reference other files that aren't installed — Matthew Bachmann <matt@...>

There are a bunch of hardcoded paths that point at /usr/bin/ruby.

1 message 2008/06/16

[#17283] Major change in 1.8.6: convert_type now uses private conversion methods too — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...>

Hi,

9 messages 2008/06/16
[#17287] Re: Major change in 1.8.6: convert_type now uses private conversion methods too — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/06/17

Vladimir Sizikov wrote:
[#17288] Re: Major change in 1.8.6: convert_type now uses private conversion methods too — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/06/17

Hi,
[#17289] Re: Major change in 1.8.6: convert_type now uses private conversion methods too — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/06/17

Hi,
[#17294] Re: Major change in 1.8.6: convert_type now uses private conversion methods too — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/06/17

Hi,
[#17317] Re: Major change in 1.8.6: convert_type now uses private conversion methods too — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/06/18

OK, nobu and I reverted Object#respond_to and made _load public instead.
[#17311] Re: Major change in 1.8.6: convert_type now uses private conversion methods too — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/06/18

Hi,
[#17303] Re: Major change in 1.8.6: convert_type now uses private conversion methods too — Brian Ford <brixen@...> 2008/06/17

Hi all,
[#17307] Re: Major change in 1.8.6: convert_type now uses private conversion methods too — "Wilson Bilkovich" <wilsonb@...> 2008/06/17

On 6/17/08, Brian Ford <brixen@gmail.com> wrote:

[#17290] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #174] (Open) [1.8.6] File.extname(".profile") is not returning an empty String — Arthur Schreiber <redmine@...>

Issue #174 has been reported by Arthur Schreiber.

4 messages 2008/06/17
[#17304] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #174] (Closed) [1.8.6] File.extname(".profile") is not returning an empty String — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2008/06/17

Issue #174 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
[#17308] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #174] [1.8.6] File.extname(".profile") is not returning an empty String — Arthur Schreiber <redmine@...> 2008/06/17

Issue #174 has been updated by Arthur Schreiber.
[#17318] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #174] [1.8.6] File.extname(".profile") is not returning an empty String — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2008/06/18

Issue #174 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.

[#17291] miniruby dependencies broken in 1.9 — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

I've been having builds break with -j 4. This should add $(PREP) to

9 messages 2008/06/17
[#17292] Re: miniruby dependencies broken in 1.9 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/06/17

Hi,
[#17295] Re: miniruby dependencies broken in 1.9 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/06/17

Hi,
[#17297] Re: miniruby dependencies broken in 1.9 — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2008/06/17

[#17298] Re: miniruby dependencies broken in 1.9 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/06/17

Hi,
[#17313] Re: miniruby dependencies broken in 1.9 — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2008/06/18

[#17316] Re: miniruby dependencies broken in 1.9 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/06/18

Hi,
[#17320] Re: miniruby dependencies broken in 1.9 — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2008/06/18

[#17296] Re: miniruby dependencies broken in 1.9 — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2008/06/17

[#17293] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #175] (Open) Rational#power2 raises a NameError or causes infinite loops when passed a Rational — Arthur Schreiber <redmine@...>

Issue #175 has been reported by Arthur Schreiber.

5 messages 2008/06/17
[#17305] soap4r — Jürgen Mangler <juergen.mangler@...> 2008/06/17

Why is ruby 1.8.7 not using version 1.5.8 from
[#17348] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #175] (Closed) Rational#power2 raises a NameError or causes infinite loops when passed a Rational — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2008/06/19

Issue #175 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.
[#17354] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #175] Rational#power2 raises a NameError or causes infinite loops when passed a Rational — Arthur Schreiber <redmine@...> 2008/06/20

Issue #175 has been updated by Arthur Schreiber.
[#17355] Re: [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #175] Rational#power2 raises a NameError or causes infinite loops when passed a Rational — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/06/20

Hi,

[#17309] soap4r — Jürgen Mangler <juergen.mangler@...>

Why is ruby 1.8.7 not using version 1.5.8 from

2 messages 2008/06/17
[#17352] Re: soap4r — "Shugo Maeda" <shugo@...> 2008/06/20

Hi,

[#17310] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #178] (Open) File.open on sprintf-formatted string fails with encoding conversion error on OS X — Eric Hodel <redmine@...>

Issue #178 has been reported by Eric Hodel.

5 messages 2008/06/18
[#17315] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #178] (Open) File.open on sprintf-formatted string fails with encoding conversion error on OS X — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2008/06/18

I'm not sure why UTF8-MAC was introduced. UTF8-MAC indeed
[#17319] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #178] (Closed) File.open on sprintf-formatted string fails with encoding conversion error on OS X — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2008/06/18

Issue #178 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#17322] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #178] (Closed) File.open on sprintf-formatted string fails with encoding conversion error on OS X — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2008/06/18

At 15:36 08/06/18, Yui NARUSE wrote:
[#17326] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #178] (Closed) File.open on sprintf-formatted string fails with encoding conversion error on OS X — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2008/06/18

Martin Duerst wrote:

[#17324] unsubscribe — "Mateusz Winiarski" <mawiniarski@...>

1 message 2008/06/18

[#17327] A plea for a release process — Brian Ford <brixen@...>

Hi all,

15 messages 2008/06/18
[#17338] Re: A plea for a release process — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/06/19

I think I was called :)
[#17349] Re: A plea for a release process — Brian Ford <brixen@...> 2008/06/19

Hello,
[#17370] Re: A plea for a release process — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...> 2008/06/21

Hi folks,
[#17328] Re: A plea for a release process — Curt Sampson <cjs@...> 2008/06/18

On 2008-06-19 04:08 +0900 (Thu), Brian Ford wrote:
[#17330] Re: A plea for a release process — Brian Ford <brixen@...> 2008/06/18

On Jun 18, 12:43=A0pm, Curt Sampson <c...@cynic.net> wrote:
[#17344] Re: A plea for a release process — Curt Sampson <cjs@...> 2008/06/19

On 2008-06-19 06:10 +0900 (Thu), Brian Ford wrote:
[#17329] Re: A plea for a release process — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2008/06/18

Hello,
[#17331] Re: A plea for a release process — Brian Ford <brixen@...> 2008/06/18

On Jun 18, 1:12=A0pm, "U.Nakamura" <u...@garbagecollect.jp> wrote:
[#17332] Re: A plea for a release process — Brian Ford <brixen@...> 2008/06/18

On Jun 18, 2:19=A0pm, Brian Ford <bri...@gmail.com> wrote:
[#17334] Re: A plea for a release process — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2008/06/18

On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Brian Ford <brixen@gmail.com> wrote:
[#17335] Re: A plea for a release process — Brian Ford <brixen@...> 2008/06/18

On Jun 18, 3:23=A0pm, "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denat...@gmail.com> wrote:
[#17336] Re: A plea for a release process — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2008/06/19

In article <51e4ec23-9189-48fe-b797-3dee85b6cc83@w5g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
[#17411] Re: A plea for a release process — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/06/28

I'll sum up my feelings in as few words as possible:
[#17421] Re: A plea for a release process — Ezra Zygmuntowicz <ezmobius@...> 2008/06/28

[#17333] [Ruby 1.8.7 - Bug #193] (Open) Crash during build on Mac OS 10.5.3/PPC when configured with --enable-pthread — Florian Ebeling <redmine@...>

Issue #193 has been reported by Florian Ebeling.

4 messages 2008/06/18
[#17375] [Ruby 1.8.7 - Bug #193] Crash during build on Mac OS 10.5.3/PPC when configured with --enable-pthread — Florian Ebeling <redmine@...> 2008/06/22

Issue #193 has been updated by Florian Ebeling.
[#17387] [Ruby 1.8.7 - Bug #193] Crash during build on Mac OS 10.5.3/PPC when configured with --enable-pthread — Florian Ebeling <redmine@...> 2008/06/23

Issue #193 has been updated by Florian Ebeling.
[#19705] [Bug #193] Crash during build on Mac OS 10.5.3/PPC when configured with --enable-pthread — Wataru Kimura <redmine@...> 2008/11/05

Issue #193 has been updated by Wataru Kimura.

[#17345] Understanding the output of Kernel#caller — "Wilson Bilkovich" <wilsonb@...>

I am trying to understand what Ruby 1.8 outputs when "caller" is invoked.

4 messages 2008/06/19
[#17484] Re: Understanding the output of Kernel#caller — "Wilson Bilkovich" <wilsonb@...> 2008/07/01

On 6/19/08, Wilson Bilkovich <wilsonb@gmail.com> wrote:
[#17516] Re: Understanding the output of Kernel#caller — "Yehuda Katz" <wycats@...> 2008/07/02

This manifests itself in rescues as well:
[#17519] Re: Understanding the output of Kernel#caller — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/07/02

Yehuda Katz wrote:

[#17353] patches for tests of rubygems — "Yusuke ENDOH" <mame@...>

Hi,

8 messages 2008/06/20
[#17395] Re: patches for tests of rubygems — "Yusuke ENDOH" <mame@...> 2008/06/24

Hi,
[#17406] Re: patches for tests of rubygems — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/06/25

On Jun 24, 2008, at 05:55 AM, Yusuke ENDOH wrote:
[#17408] Re: patches for tests of rubygems — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/06/26

On Jun 25, 2008, at 11:21 AM, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#17442] Re: patches for tests of rubygems — "Yusuke ENDOH" <mame@...> 2008/06/29

Hi Eric,
[#17444] Re: patches for tests of rubygems — "Yusuke ENDOH" <mame@...> 2008/06/29

2008/06/30 1:05 Yusuke ENDOH <mame@tsg.ne.jp>:
[#17471] Re: patches for tests of rubygems — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/06/30

On Jun 29, 2008, at 09:37 AM, Yusuke ENDOH wrote:
[#17474] Re: patches for tests of rubygems — "Yusuke ENDOH" <mame@...> 2008/07/01

2008/7/1 Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net>:

[#17356] A faster Array#delete — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>

Hi all,

7 messages 2008/06/21
[#17357] Re: A faster Array#delete — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2008/06/21

Daniel Berger wrote:
[#17362] Re: A faster Array#delete — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2008/06/21

Daniel Berger wrote:
[#17380] Re: A faster Array#delete — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/06/23

Hi,
[#17381] Re: A faster Array#delete — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2008/06/23

=20
[#17382] Re: A faster Array#delete — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/06/23

Hi,
[#17399] Re: A faster Array#delete — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2008/06/24

=20

[#17364] 1.8.6-p230 test-all fails in test/drb — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...>

Hello Guys,

3 messages 2008/06/21
[#17365] Re: 1.8.6-p230 test-all fails in test/drb — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2008/06/21

Hello,
[#17366] Re: 1.8.6-p230 test-all fails in test/drb — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...> 2008/06/21

On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 3:19 PM, U.Nakamura <usa@garbagecollect.jp> wrote:

[#17367] Building on MinGW broken (patch for win32/win32.c) — Lars Christensen <larsch@...>

The change in r17376 to win32/win32.c breaks compilation on MinGW/MSYS.

3 messages 2008/06/21
[#17368] Re: Building on MinGW broken (patch for win32/win32.c) — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2008/06/21

Hello,
[#17369] Re: Building on MinGW broken (patch for win32/win32.c) — Lars Christensen <larsch@...> 2008/06/21

U.Nakamura wrote:

[#17371] [PATCH] Improve Class#superclass documentation — Gaston Ramos <ramos.gaston@...>

Hi Core,

1 message 2008/06/21

[#17372] [PATCH] Add missing Proc#clone documentation — Gaston Ramos <ramos.gaston@...>

Hi Guys,

1 message 2008/06/22

[#17373] [PATCH] Wrong revision.h include on RUBY 1.8 branch — Gaston Ramos <ramos.gaston@...>

1 message 2008/06/22

[#17374] Strange BigDecimal#add behavior — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...>

Hi,

1 message 2008/06/22

[#17377] Re: Ruby 1.9.0/1.8.7/1.8.6/1.8.5 new releases (Security Fix) — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...>

Hi,

12 messages 2008/06/23
[#17378] Re: Ruby 1.9.0/1.8.7/1.8.6/1.8.5 new releases (Security Fix) — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2008/06/23

Bill Kelly wrote:
[#17379] Re: Ruby 1.9.0/1.8.7/1.8.6/1.8.5 new releases (Security Fix) — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...> 2008/06/23

[#17388] Re: Ruby 1.9.0/1.8.7/1.8.6/1.8.5 new releases (Security Fix) — Philip Ross <phil.ross@...> 2008/06/23

Bill Kelly wrote:
[#17459] Re: Ruby 1.9.0/1.8.7/1.8.6/1.8.5 new releases (Security Fix) — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...> 2008/06/30

[#17460] Re: Ruby 1.9.0/1.8.7/1.8.6/1.8.5 new releases (Security Fix) — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/06/30

Bill Kelly wrote:
[#17463] Re: Ruby 1.9.0/1.8.7/1.8.6/1.8.5 new releases (Security Fix) — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...> 2008/06/30

[#17465] Re: Ruby 1.9.0/1.8.7/1.8.6/1.8.5 new releases (Security Fix) — ts <decoux@...> 2008/06/30

Bill Kelly wrote:
[#17466] Re: Ruby 1.9.0/1.8.7/1.8.6/1.8.5 new releases (Security Fix) — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/06/30

Thank you Guy, this helped me a lot. I think I've backported what's
[#17467] Re: Ruby 1.9.0/1.8.7/1.8.6/1.8.5 new releases (Security Fix) — ts <decoux@...> 2008/06/30

Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
[#17468] Re: Ruby 1.9.0/1.8.7/1.8.6/1.8.5 new releases (Security Fix) — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...> 2008/06/30

[#17473] Re: Ruby 1.9.0/1.8.7/1.8.6/1.8.5 new releases (Security Fix) — "Jano Svitok" <jan.svitok@...> 2008/06/30

On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 13:53, Bill Kelly <billk@cts.com> wrote:

[#17392] XMLRPC socket patch — Dario Meloni <mellon85@...>

Hi,

5 messages 2008/06/24
[#17398] Re: XMLRPC socket patch — James Gray <james@...> 2008/06/24

On Jun 24, 2008, at 2:59 AM, Dario Meloni wrote:
[#17400] Re: XMLRPC socket patch — Dario Meloni <mellon85@...> 2008/06/24

[#17405] Re: XMLRPC socket patch — James Gray <james@...> 2008/06/25

On Jun 24, 2008, at 6:38 PM, Dario Meloni wrote:
[#17410] Re: XMLRPC socket patch — Dario Meloni <mellon85@...> 2008/06/26

> Yeah, it looks like this code is young and still evolving. Perhaps it

[#17393] URGENT: Possible fixes for segfaults and vulnerabilities available for review in ruby-talk — "Igal Koshevoy" <igal@...>

All currently available versions of MRI Ruby are either vulnerable to

104 messages 2008/06/24
[#17394] Re: URGENT: Possible fixes for segfaults and vulnerabilities available for review in ruby-talk — ts <decoux@...> 2008/06/24

Igal Koshevoy wrote:
[#17416] Re: URGENT: Possible fixes for segfaults and vulnerabilities available for review in ruby-talk — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/06/28

Sorry for a late reply but I think I've fixed this issue. Can someone
[#17417] Re: URGENT: Possible fixes for segfaults and vulnerabilities available for review in ruby-talk — Igal Koshevoy <igal@...> 2008/06/28

Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
[#17419] Re: URGENT: Possible fixes for segfaults and vulnerabilities available for review in ruby-talk — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/06/28

Igal Koshevoy wrote:
[#17422] Re: URGENT: Possible fixes for segfaults and vulnerabilities available for review in ruby-talk — Igal Koshevoy <igal@...> 2008/06/29

Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
[#17426] Re: URGENT: Possible fixes for segfaults and vulnerabilities available for review in ruby-talk — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/06/29

Igal Koshevoy wrote:
[#17438] Re: URGENT: Possible fixes for segfaults and vulnerabilities available for review in ruby-talk — Igal Koshevoy <igal@...> 2008/06/29

Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
[#17499] We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/07/02

Hello, I think current 1.8.6/1.8.7 is stable than p230/p22, so I decided
[#17517] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...> 2008/07/02

On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 12:41 PM, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#17526] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2008/07/03

Hello,
[#17530] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...> 2008/07/03

On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 8:17 AM, U.Nakamura <usa@garbagecollect.jp> wrote:
[#17533] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2008/07/03

Hello,
[#17535] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2008/07/03

Hello,
[#17536] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...> 2008/07/03

On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 10:01 AM, U.Nakamura <usa@garbagecollect.jp> wrote:
[#17537] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2008/07/03

Hello,
[#17502] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2008/07/02

Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
[#17504] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...> 2008/07/02

Hi Urabe,
[#17506] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/07/02

Vladimir Sizikov wrote:
[#17521] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/07/03

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#17522] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — Federico Builes <federico.builes@...> 2008/07/03

[#17528] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...> 2008/07/03

Hi Shyouhei,
[#17538] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2008/07/03

On 03/07/2008, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#17543] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/07/03

Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
[#17544] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — Igal Koshevoy <igal@...> 2008/07/03

Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
[#17545] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/07/03

Igal Koshevoy wrote:
[#17546] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — Igal Koshevoy <igal@...> 2008/07/03

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#17551] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/07/03

Igal Koshevoy wrote:
[#17554] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — Igal Koshevoy <igal@...> 2008/07/03

Phlip wrote:
[#17552] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — "Wilson Bilkovich" <wilsonb@...> 2008/07/03

On 7/3/08, Igal Koshevoy <igal@pragmaticraft.com> wrote:
[#17558] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2008/07/03

Wilson Bilkovich wrote:
[#17560] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2008/07/03

On 03/07/2008, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky <znmeb@cesmail.net> wrote:
[#17562] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2008/07/03

Michal Suchanek wrote:
[#17569] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — Igal Koshevoy <igal@...> 2008/07/03

Michal Suchanek wrote:
[#17579] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/07/03

Igal Koshevoy wrote:
[#17623] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — "Laurent Sansonetti" <laurent.sansonetti@...> 2008/07/06

On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter
[#17559] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2008/07/03

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#17563] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/07/03

M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
[#17564] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/07/03

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#17567] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/07/03

Phlip wrote:
[#17575] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/07/03

>> Is that enough of an "open source day job"?
[#17806] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2008/07/16

On 02/07/2008, Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@sun.com> wrote:
[#17851] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2008/07/19

In article <a5d587fb0807160533r4534fabdg257b4a9523b15f1e@mail.gmail.com>,
[#17852] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — Federico Builes <federico.builes@...> 2008/07/19

[#17853] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2008/07/19

In article <C5B5DF0B-A41E-4B01-8ECE-6B717627A114@gmail.com>,
[#17855] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — Jeremy Henty <onepoint@...> 2008/07/19

On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 02:18:05PM +0900, Federico Builes wrote:
[#17857] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — Federico Builes <federico.builes@...> 2008/07/19

[#17858] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — Jeremy Henty <onepoint@...> 2008/07/19

On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 12:43:46AM +0900, Federico Builes wrote:
[#17860] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — Jeremy Henty <onepoint@...> 2008/07/19

On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 12:43:46AM +0900, Federico Builes wrote:
[#17892] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — Federico Builes <federico.builes@...> 2008/07/21

[#17939] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — Kurt Stephens <ks@...> 2008/07/24

When will we see a new 1.8.6 release?
[#17940] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/07/24

Hi,
[#17941] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...> 2008/07/24

Hi,
[#17945] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — Jeremy Henty <onepoint@...> 2008/07/24

On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 02:04:15AM +0900, Vladimir Sizikov wrote:
[#17946] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — Jeremy Henty <onepoint@...> 2008/07/24

On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 04:35:43AM +0900, Jeremy Henty wrote:
[#17947] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — Federico Builes <federico.builes@...> 2008/07/24

Jeremy,
[#17948] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/07/25

Hi,
[#17953] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — "Daniel Luz" <dev@...> 2008/07/25

On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 9:19 PM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org>
[#17955] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — Federico Builes <federico.builes@...> 2008/07/25

[#17960] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — "Shugo Maeda" <shugo@...> 2008/07/25

Hi,
[#17965] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — Jeremy Henty <onepoint@...> 2008/07/25

On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 05:08:30PM +0900, Shugo Maeda wrote:
[#17968] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...> 2008/07/25

Hi,
[#17969] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — Jeremy Henty <onepoint@...> 2008/07/25

On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 07:20:20PM +0900, Vladimir Sizikov wrote:
[#17971] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — Federico Builes <federico.builes@...> 2008/07/25

[#17992] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — "Shugo Maeda" <shugo@...> 2008/07/27

Hi,
[#18062] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — Kurt Stephens <ks@...> 2008/08/01

When can we expect a release?
[#18078] We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday, #2 — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/08/02

Kurt Stephens wrote:
[#18183] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday, #2 — Kurt Stephens <ks@...> 2008/08/08

Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
[#18185] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday, #2 — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/08/08

Kurt Stephens wrote:
[#18210] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday, #2 — Kurt Stephens <kurt@...> 2008/08/08

ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/1.8/ruby-1.8.6-p286.tar.gz
[#17964] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — Jeremy Henty <onepoint@...> 2008/07/25

On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 08:17:27AM +0900, Federico Builes wrote:
[#17942] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/07/24

Kurt Stephens wrote:
[#17532] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — "schreiber.arthur@..." <schreiber.arthur@...> 2008/07/03

Hi Vladimir, hi Urabe,
[#17539] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/07/03

Thank you, I merged this revision into 1.8.7.
[#17540] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2008/07/03

In article <486CB4DC.4030608@ruby-lang.org>,
[#17541] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — "schreiber.arthur@..." <schreiber.arthur@...> 2008/07/03

Hello Urabe, hello Tanaka,
[#17542] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2008/07/03

In article <0347cecd-a275-4022-9efb-928fcfabf0d5@79g2000hsk.googlegroups.com>,
[#17508] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — Igal Koshevoy <igal@...> 2008/07/02

Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
[#17510] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — Igal Koshevoy <igal@...> 2008/07/02

We've got a potential problem that's not being caught by the specs:
[#17515] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...> 2008/07/02

Hi,
[#17524] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — Federico Builes <federico.builes@...> 2008/07/03

[#17525] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2008/07/03

In article <99302F3B-C06B-4B53-AB93-325E3F1AF05F@gmail.com>,
[#17527] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — Federico Builes <federico.builes@...> 2008/07/03

[#17529] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2008/07/03

In article <942C7C70-E389-4DDA-A591-9C3854FDC243@gmail.com>,
[#17423] Re: URGENT: Possible fixes for segfaults and vulnerabilities available for review in ruby-talk — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2008/06/29

In article <48662E99.7030508@pragmaticraft.com>,
[#17424] Re: URGENT: Possible fixes for segfaults and vulnerabilities available for review in ruby-talk — Federico Builes <federico.builes@...> 2008/06/29

[#17425] Re: URGENT: Possible fixes for segfaults and vulnerabilities available for review in ruby-talk — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2008/06/29

In article <82FB5EC2-0775-4EAB-AE97-A7CFA89DECE9@gmail.com>,
[#17433] Re: URGENT: Possible fixes for segfaults and vulnerabilities available for review in ruby-talk — Igal Koshevoy <igal@...> 2008/06/29

Tanaka Akira wrote:
[#17429] Re: URGENT: Possible fixes for segfaults and vulnerabilities available for review in ruby-talk — Igal Koshevoy <igal@...> 2008/06/29

Federico Builes wrote:
[#17431] Re: URGENT: Possible fixes for segfaults and vulnerabilities available for review in ruby-talk — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2008/06/29

Igal Koshevoy wrote:
[#17432] Re: URGENT: Possible fixes for segfaults and vulnerabilities available for review in ruby-talk — Igal Koshevoy <igal@...> 2008/06/29

M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
[#17446] Re: URGENT: Possible fixes for segfaults and vulnerabilities available for review in ruby-talk — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2008/06/29

Igal Koshevoy wrote:
[#17449] Re: URGENT: Possible fixes for segfaults and vulnerabilities available for review in ruby-talk — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2008/06/29

M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
[#17454] Re: URGENT: Possible fixes for segfaults and vulnerabilities available for review in ruby-talk — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/06/30

M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
[#17456] Re: URGENT: Possible fixes for segfaults and vulnerabilities available for review in ruby-talk — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2008/06/30

Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
[#17434] Re: URGENT: Possible fixes for segfaults and vulnerabilities available for review in ruby-talk — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/06/29

Igal Koshevoy wrote:
[#17435] Re: URGENT: Possible fixes for segfaults and vulnerabilities available for review in ruby-talk — Igal Koshevoy <igal@...> 2008/06/29

Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
[#17441] Re: URGENT: Possible fixes for segfaults and vulnerabilities available for review in ruby-talk — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/06/29

Igal Koshevoy wrote:
[#17436] Re: URGENT: Possible fixes for segfaults and vulnerabilities available for review in ruby-talk — Igal Koshevoy <igal@...> 2008/06/29

Tanaka Akira wrote:
[#17437] Re: URGENT: Possible fixes for segfaults and vulnerabilities available for review in ruby-talk — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2008/06/29

In article <48678E3D.8020602@pragmaticraft.com>,
[#17439] Re: URGENT: Possible fixes for segfaults and vulnerabilities available for review in ruby-talk — Igal Koshevoy <igal@...> 2008/06/29

Tanaka Akira wrote:
[#17440] Re: URGENT: Possible fixes for segfaults and vulnerabilities available for review in ruby-talk — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2008/06/29

In article <4867A6AC.4060902@pragmaticraft.com>,
[#17445] Re: URGENT: Possible fixes for segfaults and vulnerabilities available for review in ruby-talk — Igal Koshevoy <igal@...> 2008/06/29

Tanaka Akira wrote:
[#17447] Re: URGENT: Possible fixes for segfaults and vulnerabilities available for review in ruby-talk — Federico Builes <federico.builes@...> 2008/06/29

[#17401] Ruby 1.8.6: Bus Error after revision 17222 — Kornelius Kalnbach <murphy@...>

hello,

2 messages 2008/06/25
[#17402] Re: Ruby 1.8.6: Bus Error after revision 17222 — "Igal Koshevoy" <igal@...> 2008/06/25

On 6/24/08, Kornelius Kalnbach <murphy@rubychan.de> wrote:

[#17407] [PATCH] branches/ruby_1_8: Building in separate directory — Lars Christensen <larsch@...>

Branch: branches/ruby_1_8

1 message 2008/06/25

[#17409] Re: Welcome to our (ruby-core ML) You are added automatically — "Paul McMahon" <paul.mcmahon@...>

2008/6/26 <ruby-core-admin@ruby-lang.org>:

1 message 2008/06/26

[#17412] Time for a release management committee? — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>

It seems like recent problems with patchlevel and minor 1.8 releases

5 messages 2008/06/28
[#17413] Re: Time for a release management committee? — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2008/06/28

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#17414] Re: Time for a release management committee? — Igal Koshevoy <igal@...> 2008/06/28

M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
[#17418] Re: Time for a release management committee? — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/06/28

[#17415] Re: Time for a release management committee? — Igal Koshevoy <igal@...> 2008/06/28

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:

[#17427] 1.8 release management — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

Hi,

43 messages 2008/06/29
[#17428] Re: 1.8 release management — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2008/06/29

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#17450] Re: 1.8 release management — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/06/29

Hi,
[#17451] Re: 1.8 release management — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2008/06/29

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#17430] Re: 1.8 release management — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/06/29

Just FYI, 1.8.7 mentor is now shifting from knu to me. After that I'm
[#17443] Re: 1.8 release management — Igal Koshevoy <igal@...> 2008/06/29

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#17448] Re: 1.8 release management — Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org> 2008/06/29

On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 06:06:14PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#17453] Re: 1.8 release management — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/06/30

Hi,
[#17461] Re: 1.8 release management — Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org> 2008/06/30

> * After 1.8.6p0 we have formed the release management process
[#17462] Re: 1.8 release management — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/06/30

Hi,
[#17464] Re: 1.8 release management — Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org> 2008/06/30

> |> * After 1.8.6p0 we have formed the release management process
[#17475] Re: 1.8 release management — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2008/07/01

At 19:04 08/06/30, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#17476] Re: 1.8 release management — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/07/01

Hi,
[#17478] Re: 1.8 release management — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/07/01

Hi --
[#17455] Re: 1.8 release management — Stephen Bannasch <stephen.bannasch@...> 2008/06/30

Let me describe some simple questions about Ruby 1.8.6 that are not
[#17458] Re: 1.8 release management — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/06/30

For what I know,
[#17547] Re: 1.8 release management — "Wilson Bilkovich" <wilsonb@...> 2008/07/03

On 6/30/08, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#17549] Re: 1.8 release management — Igal Koshevoy <igal@...> 2008/07/03

Wilson Bilkovich wrote:
[#17553] Re: 1.8 release management — "Wilson Bilkovich" <wilsonb@...> 2008/07/03

On 7/3/08, Igal Koshevoy <igal@pragmaticraft.com> wrote:
[#17565] Re: 1.8 release management — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2008/07/03

Wilson Bilkovich wrote:
[#17555] Re: 1.8 release management — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...> 2008/07/03

On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 4:41 PM, Igal Koshevoy <igal@pragmaticraft.com> wrote:
[#17561] Re: 1.8 release management — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2008/07/03

On 03/07/2008, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:
[#17585] Re: 1.8 release management — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/07/04

Luis Lavena wrote:
[#17588] Re: 1.8 release management — Igal Koshevoy <igal@...> 2008/07/04

Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
[#17589] Re: 1.8 release management — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/07/04

Igal Koshevoy wrote:
[#17591] Re: 1.8 release management — Igal Koshevoy <igal@...> 2008/07/04

Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
[#17593] Re: 1.8 release management — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...> 2008/07/04

Hi,
[#17597] Re: 1.8 release management — Igal Koshevoy <igal@...> 2008/07/04

Vladimir Sizikov wrote:
[#17601] Re: 1.8 release management — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...> 2008/07/04

On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 10:49 PM, Igal Koshevoy <igal@pragmaticraft.com> wrote:
[#17602] Re: 1.8 release management — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2008/07/04
[#17604] Re: 1.8 release management — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...> 2008/07/04

Hi Ed,
[#17626] Re: 1.8 release management — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/07/06

Hi,
[#17632] Re: 1.8 release management — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2008/07/06
[#17705] Re: 1.8 release management — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...> 2008/07/09

Thanks, matz,
[#17728] Re: 1.8 release management — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/07/10

Hi,
[#17730] Re: 1.8 release management — Federico Builes <federico.builes@...> 2008/07/10

[#17738] Re: 1.8 release management — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2008/07/11

In article <487636E1.2020901@ruby-lang.org>,
[#17605] Re: 1.8 release management — Igal Koshevoy <igal@...> 2008/07/04

Vladimir Sizikov wrote:
[#17606] Re: 1.8 release management — Federico Builes <federico.builes@...> 2008/07/04

[#17614] Re: 1.8 release management — Jeremy Henty <onepoint@...> 2008/07/05

On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 06:12:24AM +0900, Vladimir Sizikov wrote:
[#17628] Re: 1.8 release management — Jeremy Henty <onepoint@...> 2008/07/06

On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 05:06:47PM +0900, Jeremy Henty wrote:
[#17630] Re: 1.8 release management — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/07/06

Sorry for a late reply,
[#17599] Re: 1.8 release management — Stephen Bannasch <stephen.bannasch@...> 2008/07/04

At 12:53 AM +0900 7/5/08, Urabe Shyouhei wrote:

[#17452] Ruby 1.8.6 is now patched in Gentoo Linux!! — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...>

I just synced my machine and got the latest Ruby from the Portage

2 messages 2008/06/29
[#17469] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 is now patched in Gentoo Linux!! — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/06/30

Hi,

[#17457] Ruby status on Gentoo — Hans de Graaff <graaff@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2008/06/30
[#17470] Re: Ruby status on Gentoo — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/06/30

Hi,

[#17472] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #206] (Open) BigDecimal precision in divmod — Anonymous <redmine@...>

Issue #206 has been reported by Anonymous.

1 message 2008/06/30

[ruby-core:17450] Re: 1.8 release management

From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Date: 2008-06-29 21:58:25 UTC
List: ruby-core #17450 
Hi,

In message "Re: [ruby-core:17428] Re: 1.8 release management"
    on Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:33:07 +0900, "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@cesmail.net> writes:

|As I understand it, maintenance has been dropped for 1.8.5. I doubt if 
|that has a serious impact except for those running servers on old Linux 
|distros that shipped with 1.8.5. They'll clearly have to upgrade to 1.8.6.

Right.  Now 1.8.6 and 1.8.7 are under stable maintenance.  1.8.8 (to
be) is maintained as 1.8 head.  The basic principle is having a head
and two maintenance versions.

|But I think the syntactic and semantic differences between 1.8.7 and 
|1.8.6 are a problem for a number of reasons:
|
|1. The vast majority of Ruby 1.8 users are on 1.8.6.
|2. Most of the other implementations are using the 1.8.6 syntax and 
|semantics as their base.
|3. It's difficult for most Linux distros to maintain two 1.8.x versions.
|4. I think "backporting" features from 1.9 takes resources and attention 
|away from 1.9.
|
|This last reason is actually my main concern. How are we going to get 
|people to use 1.9? How are we going to evolve to 2.0? I personally will 
|load 1.8.7 only if Gentoo makes it the default Ruby 1.8. I don't see the 
|point in testing it, or coding to it, when I can test and code to 1.9.

We cannot have the major improvement in 1.9 (YARV performance and
M17N) in 1.8 anyway.  The purpose of backporting is reducing migration
cost to 1.9.  We have to ask Akinori for more detail.

							matz.

In This Thread

Prev Next