[#17566] rubychecker - runs checks on a Ruby interpreter — Igal Koshevoy <igal@...>

I've put together a shell script that runs checks on a Ruby interpreter.

14 messages 2008/07/03

[#17615] [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...>

At the moment, ruby-mode.el uses font-lock-keywords as opposed to

22 messages 2008/07/05
[#17657] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/07/08

[#17678] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...> 2008/07/09

It was designed to fix the following case:

[#17755] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...> 2008/07/13

Here's a third patch that fixes a bug in the second and uses a quicker

[#17772] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...> 2008/07/15

One more patch which fixes a few bugs in the the last one.

[#17773] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/07/15

Hi,

[#17776] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...> 2008/07/15

Looks like version 22 doesn't support explicitly numbered regexp groups.

[#17779] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/07/15

Hi,

[#17783] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/07/15

Hi,

[#17788] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...> 2008/07/15

Alright, here's a version that fixes both the highlighting bug and the

[#17793] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/07/16

Hi,

[#17644] Features to be included in Ruby 1.9.1 — "Yugui (Yuki Sonoda)" <yugui@...>

Hi, all

27 messages 2008/07/08

[#17674] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #238] (Open) Ruby doesn't respect the Windows read-only flag — Jim Deville <redmine@...>

Issue #238 has been reported by Jim Deville.

10 messages 2008/07/08

[#17708] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #252] (Open) Array#sort doesn't respect overridden <=> — Ryan Davis <redmine@...>

Issue #252 has been reported by Ryan Davis.

13 messages 2008/07/09

[#17871] duping the NilClass — "Nasir Khan" <rubylearner@...>

While nil is an object, calling dup on it causes TypeError. This doesnt seem

33 messages 2008/07/20
[#17872] Re: duping the NilClass — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/07/20

Nasir Khan wrote:

[#17873] Re: duping the NilClass — "Meinrad Recheis" <meinrad.recheis@...> 2008/07/20

On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org>

[#17877] Re: duping the NilClass — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/07/20

Meinrad Recheis wrote:

[#17879] Re: duping the NilClass — Kurt Stephens <ks@...> 2008/07/20

Urabe Shyouhei wrote:

[#17880] Re: duping the NilClass — "Nasir Khan" <rubylearner@...> 2008/07/21

I write a lot of hand crafted dup or clone because I want control as well as

[#17881] Re: duping the NilClass — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/07/21

Hi --

[#17882] Re: duping the NilClass — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/07/21

+1 to David. A convenient way to do Marshal idiom should be a new

[#17885] Re: duping the NilClass — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...> 2008/07/21

On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:21 AM, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#17887] Re: duping the NilClass — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/07/21

Hi --

[#17889] Re: duping the NilClass — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...> 2008/07/21

On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 1:02 PM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:

[#17883] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #340] (Open) 1.9/trunk does not work when compiled with llvm-gcc4 2.3 (gcc 4.2.1) — Ollivier Robert <redmine@...>

Issue #340 has been reported by Ollivier Robert.

14 messages 2008/07/21

[#17943] RUBY_ENGINE? — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...>

Hi,

56 messages 2008/07/24
[#17950] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2008/07/25

In article <3454c9680807241200xf7cc766qb987905a3987bb78@mail.gmail.com>,

[#17958] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...> 2008/07/25

Hi,

[#17981] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2008/07/26

In article <3454c9680807250054i70db563duf44b42d92ba41bfb@mail.gmail.com>,

[ruby-core:17558] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday

From: "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...>
Date: 2008-07-03 17:32:04 UTC
List: ruby-core #17558
Wilson Bilkovich wrote:
> On 7/3/08, Igal Koshevoy <igal@pragmaticraft.com> wrote:
>> Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
>>
>>> Igal Koshevoy wrote:
>>>
>>>> Please delay the release. I don't think we'll be able to resolve the
>> remaining critical issues by Friday.
>>> For what it's worth, this is all a strong argument for having a CI server
>> and keeping rubyspec "green" all the time. Nobody likes having to delay a
>> release because there's a stack of errors to be dealt with.
>>  Absolutely.
>>
>>  Is anyone providing CI for Ruby releases? Is there a good CI tool written
>> in Ruby? Would Hudson be acceptable for doing Ruby stuff? Is JRuby or one of
>> the other alternative implementations using something for CI that they're
>> happy with?
>>
>>  I've been building up a shell script, mostly for personal use, so I can run
>> the checks against various test suites. I attached an earlier version with
>> my bug report #199 asking for patch reviews. I can mop that script up a bit
>> and release versions so that others can run the full suite of tests
>> on-demand from their  command line and or from a CI server. I've been
>> building this as a shell script because it minimizes dependencies so that as
>> long as the user has bash, svn, git, wget, tar and maybe a tiny number of
>> other utilities, they can run it. Does this sound useful?
>>
>>  I also talked earlier about setting up a bunch of VMs running different
>> OSes and running the test scripts against these, which would be a good way
>> to catch platform-specific issues. Is there interest in such a thing?
>>
>>  However, if someone's already done this effort, it'd be good to know so we
>> can take a look at it and possibly build upon it instead.
>>
> 
> Ryan Davis is working on a system for this right now. Last I heard, it
> is nearing completion.
> 
> 

Glad to hear it. I've got some spare cycles (day job starts again 8 
July.) :) I was about to start up on this, but if someone is doing it, 
I'll wait. My own thinking was to do

1. Check out Ruby 1.8.6 from SVN.
2. Compile with GCC 4.3.1 with the "gcov" coverage analysis and debug 
options. I only have an AMD64 dual-core and 4 GB of RAM running Gentoo 
Linux, not a buncha VMs with every conceivable environment. For other 
environmental reasons, I compile *with* threads.
3. Run all the test suites and benchmark suites (someday, we really 
should merge those.) :)
4. Post the code coverage analysis, test suite results, and tracebacks 
for any crashes "somewhere". I've got "oprofile" working, so I can also 
post profiles if anyone cares.

I'm definitely going to do the benchmarks; this started out as a 
profiling exercise on Rubinius. :) A Rakefile would be nice, but I am a 
terrible Rakefile writer -- for some reason, I can't do "DRY" Rakefiles. 
I usually end up just defining a whole bunch of Ruby methods to make a 
sensibly factored set of code, which seems somehow "un-Rake-like." :)

In This Thread